Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-clinical isolates from Nigeria.

IF 4.9 4区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Ahmad Adebayo Irekeola, Rafidah Hanim Shueb, Engku Nur Syafirah Engku Abd Rahman, Kizito Eneye Bello, Abdirahman Hussein Elmi, Hafeez Abiola Afolabi, Amal A Sabour, Maha A Alshiekheid, Nawal A Al Kaabi, Maha F Al-Subaie, Ali A Rabaan
{"title":"Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella spp</i>: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-clinical isolates from Nigeria.","authors":"Ahmad Adebayo Irekeola, Rafidah Hanim Shueb, Engku Nur Syafirah Engku Abd Rahman, Kizito Eneye Bello, Abdirahman Hussein Elmi, Hafeez Abiola Afolabi, Amal A Sabour, Maha A Alshiekheid, Nawal A Al Kaabi, Maha F Al-Subaie, Ali A Rabaan","doi":"10.1080/20477724.2025.2479971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The issue of bacterial resistance remains a significant public health problem, with carbapenem-resistant <i>Klebsiella spp</i> and <i>E. coli</i> having adverse effects on agriculture and healthcare. Nonetheless, the true prevalence of CRE in non-clinical settings in Nigeria is unknown. Thus, for the first time, this study undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to offer comprehensive data on the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella spp</i> in non-clinical isolates from Nigeria. The guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) was followed. Multiple databases were searched for relevant studies and data from eligible studies were analyzed using the random effect model. From 321 retrieved records, 17 were included. The pooled prevalence of carbapenem-resistant <i>E. coli</i> was 14.2% (95% CI: 4.6-36.0, <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 94.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001), which was lower than carbapenem-resistant <i>Klebsiella spp</i> at 37.8% (95% CI: 13.6-70.2, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 86.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The prevalence of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella spp</i> was highest in Nasarawa and Ebonyi, with estimates of 85.0% (95% CI: 70.4% - 93.1%) and 80.1% (95% CI: 69.8-87.5%), respectively. The prevalence of <i>Klebsiella spp</i>. was greater in the South-East region (63.0%) compared with the South-West region (4.5%) of the country. There was a significant variation in the prevalence of these pathogens depending on the sample sources, with a progressive increase observed over time. This study underscores a notable prevalence of carbapenem-resistant pathogens in non-clinical settings, highlighting the imperative for a holistic management approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":19850,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens and Global Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2025.2479971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of bacterial resistance remains a significant public health problem, with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp and E. coli having adverse effects on agriculture and healthcare. Nonetheless, the true prevalence of CRE in non-clinical settings in Nigeria is unknown. Thus, for the first time, this study undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to offer comprehensive data on the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp in non-clinical isolates from Nigeria. The guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) was followed. Multiple databases were searched for relevant studies and data from eligible studies were analyzed using the random effect model. From 321 retrieved records, 17 were included. The pooled prevalence of carbapenem-resistant E. coli was 14.2% (95% CI: 4.6-36.0, I2 = 94.51, p < 0.001), which was lower than carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp at 37.8% (95% CI: 13.6-70.2, I2 = 86.48, p < 0.001). The prevalence of E. coli and Klebsiella spp was highest in Nasarawa and Ebonyi, with estimates of 85.0% (95% CI: 70.4% - 93.1%) and 80.1% (95% CI: 69.8-87.5%), respectively. The prevalence of Klebsiella spp. was greater in the South-East region (63.0%) compared with the South-West region (4.5%) of the country. There was a significant variation in the prevalence of these pathogens depending on the sample sources, with a progressive increase observed over time. This study underscores a notable prevalence of carbapenem-resistant pathogens in non-clinical settings, highlighting the imperative for a holistic management approach.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathogens and Global Health
Pathogens and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-PARASITOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pathogens and Global Health is a journal of infectious disease and public health that focuses on the translation of molecular, immunological, genomics and epidemiological knowledge into control measures for global health threat. The journal publishes original innovative research papers, reviews articles and interviews policy makers and opinion leaders on health subjects of international relevance. It provides a forum for scientific, ethical and political discussion of new innovative solutions for controlling and eradicating infectious diseases, with particular emphasis on those diseases affecting the poorest regions of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信