Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is a risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty with a conventional polyethylene liner: a 25-year follow-up study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hideki Ueyama, Mitsuyoshi Yamamura, Junichiro Koyanagi, Kenji Fukunaga, Susumu Takemura, Suguru Nakamura, Hiroshi Kagiyama
{"title":"Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is a risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty with a conventional polyethylene liner: a 25-year follow-up study.","authors":"Hideki Ueyama, Mitsuyoshi Yamamura, Junichiro Koyanagi, Kenji Fukunaga, Susumu Takemura, Suguru Nakamura, Hiroshi Kagiyama","doi":"10.1177/11207000251326473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is an independent risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a conventional polyethylene (PE) liner is unclear. This long-term follow-up study assessed the association between posterior pelvic tilt and cup revision after THA using the porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 94 patients who underwent THA using the PCA total hip system and participated in postoperative follow-up for a mean of 25 years. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score was the clinical outcome, and prosthetic alignment and the change in pelvic tilt were measured as radiological outcomes. Prosthetic survival rates for revision as the endpoint were evaluated, and risk factors for cup revision were identified using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The JOA hip score improved significantly (<i>p <</i> 0.001) after THA (before THA: 41 ± 6.3 points; after THA: 86 ± 8.9 points). The postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progressed 3.6 ± 3.2°. Survival rates of the cup and stem at 27 years postoperatively were 60.8% and 87.5%, respectively (<i>p <</i> 0.001). The main reason for revision (81% of all revisions) was aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.20; <i>p =</i> 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When the PCA total hip system was used, the stem exhibited good longevity during a mean follow-up period of 25 years; however, the cup was vulnerable because of aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000251326473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251326473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is an independent risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a conventional polyethylene (PE) liner is unclear. This long-term follow-up study assessed the association between posterior pelvic tilt and cup revision after THA using the porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip system.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 94 patients who underwent THA using the PCA total hip system and participated in postoperative follow-up for a mean of 25 years. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score was the clinical outcome, and prosthetic alignment and the change in pelvic tilt were measured as radiological outcomes. Prosthetic survival rates for revision as the endpoint were evaluated, and risk factors for cup revision were identified using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: The JOA hip score improved significantly (p < 0.001) after THA (before THA: 41 ± 6.3 points; after THA: 86 ± 8.9 points). The postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progressed 3.6 ± 3.2°. Survival rates of the cup and stem at 27 years postoperatively were 60.8% and 87.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). The main reason for revision (81% of all revisions) was aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.20; p = 0.022).

Conclusions: When the PCA total hip system was used, the stem exhibited good longevity during a mean follow-up period of 25 years; however, the cup was vulnerable because of aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信