Facilitated Versus Patient-Directed Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yael Schenker, Shane C Belin, Tianxiu Wang, Rebecca L Sudore, Bernard Hammes, Robert M Arnold, Roberta Flowers, Eric Chiu, Julian Hall, Yvette Dudley-Morrissey, Betty Ferrell, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Adam Brufsky, Edward Chu, Vikram Gorantla, Dhaval Mehta, Roby Thomas, Melissa Yee, Douglas White
{"title":"Facilitated Versus Patient-Directed Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Yael Schenker, Shane C Belin, Tianxiu Wang, Rebecca L Sudore, Bernard Hammes, Robert M Arnold, Roberta Flowers, Eric Chiu, Julian Hall, Yvette Dudley-Morrissey, Betty Ferrell, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Adam Brufsky, Edward Chu, Vikram Gorantla, Dhaval Mehta, Roby Thomas, Melissa Yee, Douglas White","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Guidelines recommend advance care planning (ACP) to improve patient-centered care near the end of life (EOL), but the optimal approach is unknown. This single-blind, patient-level, randomized comparative effectiveness trial compared two patient-facing ACP interventions that are widely used but differ in costs and complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with advanced solid tumors and their caregivers were recruited from academic and community oncology clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to facilitated ACP using trained nurse facilitators versus patient-directed ACP using written and web-based tools. The primary outcome was patient-reported ACP engagement (assessed at baseline and 12 weeks using a 15-item validated survey; range, 0-5; higher scores indicate higher engagement). Secondary outcomes included advance directive completion and communication about EOL wishes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [10.5] years; 192 women [48%]). At 12 weeks, patients in the facilitated versus patient-directed group reported higher ACP engagement (4.34 [0.78] <i>v</i> 4.08 [0.82]; adjusted mean difference, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4]; <i>P</i> = .0014) and higher odds of completing an advance directive (74.8% <i>v</i> 60.6%; OR, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.27 to 5.0]; <i>P</i> = .008). There were no significant differences between the facilitated and patient-directed groups in the odds of having a conversation about EOL wishes with family or friends (88.9% <i>v</i> 88%; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.5 to 2.6]; <i>P</i> = .76) or physicians (49.6% <i>v</i> 40.6%; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.9 to 2.7]; <i>P</i> = .13), and all ACP behaviors increased significantly from baseline in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facilitated ACP resulted in greater increases in ACP engagement and advance directive completion than patient-directed written and web-based materials. Although some patients with advanced cancer may engage in self-directed ACP, some may need additional facilitator support.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500046"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Guidelines recommend advance care planning (ACP) to improve patient-centered care near the end of life (EOL), but the optimal approach is unknown. This single-blind, patient-level, randomized comparative effectiveness trial compared two patient-facing ACP interventions that are widely used but differ in costs and complexity.

Methods: Adult patients with advanced solid tumors and their caregivers were recruited from academic and community oncology clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to facilitated ACP using trained nurse facilitators versus patient-directed ACP using written and web-based tools. The primary outcome was patient-reported ACP engagement (assessed at baseline and 12 weeks using a 15-item validated survey; range, 0-5; higher scores indicate higher engagement). Secondary outcomes included advance directive completion and communication about EOL wishes.

Results: A total of 400 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [10.5] years; 192 women [48%]). At 12 weeks, patients in the facilitated versus patient-directed group reported higher ACP engagement (4.34 [0.78] v 4.08 [0.82]; adjusted mean difference, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4]; P = .0014) and higher odds of completing an advance directive (74.8% v 60.6%; OR, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.27 to 5.0]; P = .008). There were no significant differences between the facilitated and patient-directed groups in the odds of having a conversation about EOL wishes with family or friends (88.9% v 88%; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.5 to 2.6]; P = .76) or physicians (49.6% v 40.6%; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.9 to 2.7]; P = .13), and all ACP behaviors increased significantly from baseline in both groups.

Conclusion: Facilitated ACP resulted in greater increases in ACP engagement and advance directive completion than patient-directed written and web-based materials. Although some patients with advanced cancer may engage in self-directed ACP, some may need additional facilitator support.

促进与患者指导的晚期癌症患者的提前护理计划:一项随机临床试验。
目的:指南推荐提前护理计划(ACP),以改善以患者为中心的临终关怀(EOL),但最佳方法尚不清楚。这项单盲、患者水平、随机比较疗效的试验比较了两种面向患者的ACP干预措施,这两种干预措施广泛使用,但在成本和复杂性方面存在差异。方法:从学术和社区肿瘤诊所招募成年晚期实体瘤患者及其护理人员。参与者被随机分配到使用训练有素的护士辅导员的辅助ACP和使用书面和基于网络的工具的患者指导ACP。主要结局是患者报告的ACP参与程度(在基线和12周时评估,使用15项经过验证的调查;范围0 - 5;分数越高,用户粘性越高)。次要结果包括预先指示的完成情况和EOL意愿的沟通。结果:共入组400例患者(平均[SD]年龄67.9[10.5]岁;192名女性[48%])。12周时,辅助组与患者指导组的ACP参与度更高(4.34 [0.78]vs 4.08 [0.82]);校正平均差为0.25 [95% CI, 0.1 ~ 0.4];P = 0.0014),完成预先指示的几率更高(74.8% vs 60.6%;OR, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.27 ~ 5.0];P = .008)。在与家人或朋友谈论EOL愿望的几率方面,促进组和患者指导组之间没有显著差异(88.9% vs 88%;OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.5 ~ 2.6];P = 0.76)或医生(49.6% vs 40.6%;OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.9 ~ 2.7];P = .13),两组ACP行为均较基线显著增加。结论:与患者指导的书面材料和网络材料相比,辅助ACP可提高ACP的参与度和提前指导的完成度。虽然一些晚期癌症患者可能会进行自我指导的ACP,但有些患者可能需要额外的辅助支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信