Methylphenidate for the cognitive and neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1546080
Jemima L C Rees, Rachel Saunders, Carl R Krynicki, Antonio Belli, Zubair Ahmed, Valentina Di Pietro, Andrew R Stevens
{"title":"Methylphenidate for the cognitive and neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jemima L C Rees, Rachel Saunders, Carl R Krynicki, Antonio Belli, Zubair Ahmed, Valentina Di Pietro, Andrew R Stevens","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1546080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability globally and is associated with long-term cognitive and neurobehavioural deficits. Methylphenidate has been proposed to address these lasting symptoms, however comprehensive evidence is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of methylphenidate on multiple cognitive and neurobehavioural domains in adults with TBI. The search conducted across five databases yielded 1,019 results, of which 25 were relevant to this review. Meta-analyses were conducted where homogenous data was available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant results favouring methylphenidate were recorded by meta-analyses for one of five cognition outcome measures (Trail Making Test A) (<i>p</i> = 0.005, CI [-5.19, -0.91]), as well as the depression domain (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, CI [-0.78, -0.39]) and the fatigue domain (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, CI [-0.98, -0.67]). Insufficient data was available in the aggression, apathy, agitation, memory, motor function, post-concussion syndrome and sleep domains for inclusion in meta-analysis. Qualitative review of evidence in these domains found limited and mixed evidence on the efficacy of methylphenidate, though significant benefits have been demonstrated in these various domains in small, randomised studies. Eleven of the 25 studies were judged as containing some to high risk of bias. However, this review identified supportive evidence for the beneficial effects of methylphenidate to improve depression and fatigue in adults with TBI, with some possible benefits for cognition and other symptoms. Heterogeneity was high and risk of bias was variable across studies, somewhat limiting credibility of results.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Methylphenidate may enhance the ongoing care of TBI patients, by addressing neurobehavioural and cognitive symptoms simultaneously. Further large-scale and high-quality clinical trials evaluating a comprehensive range of possible benefits to symptoms should be conducted to more conclusively elucidate the potential of methylphenidate for clinical efficacy in TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1546080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1546080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability globally and is associated with long-term cognitive and neurobehavioural deficits. Methylphenidate has been proposed to address these lasting symptoms, however comprehensive evidence is lacking.

Methods: This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of methylphenidate on multiple cognitive and neurobehavioural domains in adults with TBI. The search conducted across five databases yielded 1,019 results, of which 25 were relevant to this review. Meta-analyses were conducted where homogenous data was available.

Results: Significant results favouring methylphenidate were recorded by meta-analyses for one of five cognition outcome measures (Trail Making Test A) (p = 0.005, CI [-5.19, -0.91]), as well as the depression domain (p < 0.00001, CI [-0.78, -0.39]) and the fatigue domain (p < 0.00001, CI [-0.98, -0.67]). Insufficient data was available in the aggression, apathy, agitation, memory, motor function, post-concussion syndrome and sleep domains for inclusion in meta-analysis. Qualitative review of evidence in these domains found limited and mixed evidence on the efficacy of methylphenidate, though significant benefits have been demonstrated in these various domains in small, randomised studies. Eleven of the 25 studies were judged as containing some to high risk of bias. However, this review identified supportive evidence for the beneficial effects of methylphenidate to improve depression and fatigue in adults with TBI, with some possible benefits for cognition and other symptoms. Heterogeneity was high and risk of bias was variable across studies, somewhat limiting credibility of results.

Discussion: Methylphenidate may enhance the ongoing care of TBI patients, by addressing neurobehavioural and cognitive symptoms simultaneously. Further large-scale and high-quality clinical trials evaluating a comprehensive range of possible benefits to symptoms should be conducted to more conclusively elucidate the potential of methylphenidate for clinical efficacy in TBI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信