Novel water-based automated endoscope cleaning process vs conventional manual cleaning for reducing duodenoscope contamination.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2536-8061
Koen van der Ploeg, Juliëtte A Severin, Margreet C Vos, Nicole S Erler, Adriana J C Bulkmans, Marco Bruno, Bibi C G C Mason-Slingerland
{"title":"Novel water-based automated endoscope cleaning process vs conventional manual cleaning for reducing duodenoscope contamination.","authors":"Koen van der Ploeg, Juliëtte A Severin, Margreet C Vos, Nicole S Erler, Adriana J C Bulkmans, Marco Bruno, Bibi C G C Mason-Slingerland","doi":"10.1055/a-2536-8061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Duodenoscope contamination remains a persistent problem, exposing patients to infection risks. Automation in reprocessing may limit human error, reduce workload, and increase uniformity and traceability. However, its effectiveness should be evaluated before implementation. This study assessed the impact of implementing a novel water-based automated endoscope cleaning process on duodenoscope contamination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This before-and-after intervention study compared duodenoscope cleaning methods. From January 2022 to December 2023, conventional manual cleaning was used. From January 2024 to June 2024, the AquaTYPHOON system (AT) replaced manual cleaning. Cultures from Pentax ED34-i10T2 patient-ready duodenoscopes were collected. The main outcome was the contamination rate with microorganisms of gut or oral origin (MGO). Secondary outcomes included contamination with solely gut bacteria. Non-inferiority of the AT was tested using a generalized estimating equation with a non-inferiority margin of 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the manual cleaning period, 333 duodenoscope cultures of eight duodenoscopes were collected; during the AT period, 100 cultures were collected. Pre-introduction of the AT, the contamination rate with MGO was 21.6%, which fell to 16% post-introduction (risk difference: -5.6%, upper bound 90% confidence interval [CI] 6.8%). For gut bacteria, the contamination rate decreased from 14.4% to 9% (risk difference: -5.4%, upper bound 90% CI 3.9%), indicating non-inferiority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AT reduced the contamination rate with MGO, but non-inferiority was not demonstrated. For gut bacteria, AT was non-inferior to manual cleaning. These results are promising. However, future studies should confirm these findings in larger samples and explore other advantages of using the AT in duodenoscope cleaning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25368061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2536-8061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Duodenoscope contamination remains a persistent problem, exposing patients to infection risks. Automation in reprocessing may limit human error, reduce workload, and increase uniformity and traceability. However, its effectiveness should be evaluated before implementation. This study assessed the impact of implementing a novel water-based automated endoscope cleaning process on duodenoscope contamination.

Methods: This before-and-after intervention study compared duodenoscope cleaning methods. From January 2022 to December 2023, conventional manual cleaning was used. From January 2024 to June 2024, the AquaTYPHOON system (AT) replaced manual cleaning. Cultures from Pentax ED34-i10T2 patient-ready duodenoscopes were collected. The main outcome was the contamination rate with microorganisms of gut or oral origin (MGO). Secondary outcomes included contamination with solely gut bacteria. Non-inferiority of the AT was tested using a generalized estimating equation with a non-inferiority margin of 5%.

Results: During the manual cleaning period, 333 duodenoscope cultures of eight duodenoscopes were collected; during the AT period, 100 cultures were collected. Pre-introduction of the AT, the contamination rate with MGO was 21.6%, which fell to 16% post-introduction (risk difference: -5.6%, upper bound 90% confidence interval [CI] 6.8%). For gut bacteria, the contamination rate decreased from 14.4% to 9% (risk difference: -5.4%, upper bound 90% CI 3.9%), indicating non-inferiority.

Conclusions: AT reduced the contamination rate with MGO, but non-inferiority was not demonstrated. For gut bacteria, AT was non-inferior to manual cleaning. These results are promising. However, future studies should confirm these findings in larger samples and explore other advantages of using the AT in duodenoscope cleaning.

新型水基内窥镜自动清洗工艺与传统人工清洗工艺相比,可减少十二指肠镜污染。
背景与研究目的:十二指肠镜污染是一个长期存在的问题,使患者面临感染风险。再处理中的自动化可以限制人为错误,减少工作量,并增加一致性和可追溯性。但是,在实施之前应该对其有效性进行评估。本研究评估了实施一种新型水基自动内窥镜清洗工艺对十二指肠镜污染的影响。方法:对干预前后十二指肠镜清洗方法进行比较研究。从2022年1月到2023年12月,使用传统的人工清洁。从2024年1月到2024年6月,AquaTYPHOON系统(AT)取代了人工清洗。收集宾得ED34-i10T2病人型十二指肠镜培养物。主要结果是肠道或口腔微生物(MGO)的污染率。次要结果包括单纯肠道细菌污染。AT的非劣效性采用非劣效性裕度为5%的广义估计方程进行检验。结果:人工清洗期间共收集8个十二指肠镜培养物333个;在AT期间,收集100个培养物。引入AT前,MGO污染率为21.6%,引入后降至16%(风险差异:-5.6%,90%置信区间上限[CI] 6.8%)。对于肠道细菌,污染率从14.4%下降到9%(风险差:-5.4%,上限90% CI 3.9%),表明非劣效性。结论:AT降低了MGO的污染率,但没有证明非劣效性。对于肠道细菌,AT的效果不逊于人工清洁。这些结果是有希望的。然而,未来的研究应在更大的样本中证实这些发现,并探索在十二指肠镜清洁中使用AT的其他优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信