Estimation of Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Functional Index.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Milena Engelke, Laura Basso, Berthold Langguth, Florian Zeman, Winfried Schlee, Stefan Schoisswohl, Rilana Cima, Dimitris Kikidis, Jose Antonio Lopez-Escamez, Petra Brüggemann, Birgit Mazurek, Jorge Piano Simões
{"title":"Estimation of Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Functional Index.","authors":"Milena Engelke, Laura Basso, Berthold Langguth, Florian Zeman, Winfried Schlee, Stefan Schoisswohl, Rilana Cima, Dimitris Kikidis, Jose Antonio Lopez-Escamez, Petra Brüggemann, Birgit Mazurek, Jorge Piano Simões","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) represents the smallest change in treatment outcome deemed clinically meaningful. This study estimates the MCID for 2 widely used tinnitus measures: the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), using anchor-based approaches while accounting for baseline severity and time interval.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A multi-center randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>European tinnitus centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anchor-based approaches, including the effect size, receiver-operating characteristics, and ΔTHI/TFI methods, were employed to determine the MCID. The \"minimally improved\" category of the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) served as the anchor. The standard error of measurement was used to assess random variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the THI, MCID estimates ranged from 7.8 to 12, with a point estimate of 11 after 12 weeks of treatment (N = 364). For the TFI, MCID estimates ranged from 7.3 to 9.4, with a point estimate of 9 points after 12 weeks (N = 359). Both measures indicated that higher baseline severity and longer time intervals required greater score reduction for clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the context-specific nature of MCID values for tinnitus measures and emphasizes the need for consensus on optimal anchor-based approaches to improve comparability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) represents the smallest change in treatment outcome deemed clinically meaningful. This study estimates the MCID for 2 widely used tinnitus measures: the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), using anchor-based approaches while accounting for baseline severity and time interval.

Study design: A multi-center randomized clinical trial.

Setting: European tinnitus centers.

Methods: Anchor-based approaches, including the effect size, receiver-operating characteristics, and ΔTHI/TFI methods, were employed to determine the MCID. The "minimally improved" category of the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) served as the anchor. The standard error of measurement was used to assess random variation.

Results: For the THI, MCID estimates ranged from 7.8 to 12, with a point estimate of 11 after 12 weeks of treatment (N = 364). For the TFI, MCID estimates ranged from 7.3 to 9.4, with a point estimate of 9 points after 12 weeks (N = 359). Both measures indicated that higher baseline severity and longer time intervals required greater score reduction for clinical relevance.

Conclusion: This study highlights the context-specific nature of MCID values for tinnitus measures and emphasizes the need for consensus on optimal anchor-based approaches to improve comparability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信