Analysing diagnostic practices and referral pathways for glaucoma in Australian primary eye care.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Catherine L Jan, Randall S Stafford, Xianwen Shang, Jacqueline Henwood, Christian Davey, Jiahao Liu, Peter van Wijngaarden, George Y X Kong, Jennifer C Fan Gaskin, Mingguang He, Algis Vingrys
{"title":"Analysing diagnostic practices and referral pathways for glaucoma in Australian primary eye care.","authors":"Catherine L Jan, Randall S Stafford, Xianwen Shang, Jacqueline Henwood, Christian Davey, Jiahao Liu, Peter van Wijngaarden, George Y X Kong, Jennifer C Fan Gaskin, Mingguang He, Algis Vingrys","doi":"10.1111/opo.13491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally, posing a significant public health challenge in Australia, particularly among individuals aged 55 years and older. As primary health care providers, optometrists play a crucial role in the early diagnosis and management of glaucoma, making them central to efforts aimed at reducing the burden of this sight-threatening condition. This study investigates the practice patterns of Australian optometrists in diagnosing and managing glaucoma, focusing on test utilisation, diagnostic confidence, referral practices and intra- and inter-observer variabilities in grading glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method cross-sectional design was conducted, involving 50 Australian optometrists who graded 120 colour digital retinal photographs for GON and completed an online survey regarding their diagnostic methods and confidence levels. Statistical analyses assessed inter- and intra-observer agreement in GON grading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 82% of optometrists surveyed possessed optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments and 96% had visual field analysers. Despite a majority expressing confidence in glaucoma detection, only 8% felt capable of independently diagnosing the disease and initiating treatment. Inter-observer agreement for glaucoma detection from retinal photographs was moderate (kappa = 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-0.54), while intra-observer agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77). Inter-observer agreement of optometrists was similar to that of ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most optometrists have access to advanced diagnostic tools, know how to appropriately diagnose and manage glaucoma and have similar inter-observer variability when assessing fundus photographs to that of glaucoma sub-specialists, but few feel confident in independently diagnosing and managing glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally, posing a significant public health challenge in Australia, particularly among individuals aged 55 years and older. As primary health care providers, optometrists play a crucial role in the early diagnosis and management of glaucoma, making them central to efforts aimed at reducing the burden of this sight-threatening condition. This study investigates the practice patterns of Australian optometrists in diagnosing and managing glaucoma, focusing on test utilisation, diagnostic confidence, referral practices and intra- and inter-observer variabilities in grading glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).

Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional design was conducted, involving 50 Australian optometrists who graded 120 colour digital retinal photographs for GON and completed an online survey regarding their diagnostic methods and confidence levels. Statistical analyses assessed inter- and intra-observer agreement in GON grading.

Results: The results showed that 82% of optometrists surveyed possessed optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments and 96% had visual field analysers. Despite a majority expressing confidence in glaucoma detection, only 8% felt capable of independently diagnosing the disease and initiating treatment. Inter-observer agreement for glaucoma detection from retinal photographs was moderate (kappa = 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-0.54), while intra-observer agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77). Inter-observer agreement of optometrists was similar to that of ophthalmologists.

Conclusion: Most optometrists have access to advanced diagnostic tools, know how to appropriately diagnose and manage glaucoma and have similar inter-observer variability when assessing fundus photographs to that of glaucoma sub-specialists, but few feel confident in independently diagnosing and managing glaucoma.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信