Analysing diagnostic practices and referral pathways for glaucoma in Australian primary eye care.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1111/opo.13491
Catherine L Jan, Randall S Stafford, Xianwen Shang, Jacqueline Henwood, Christian Davey, Jiahao Liu, Peter van Wijngaarden, George Y X Kong, Jennifer C Fan Gaskin, Mingguang He, Algis Vingrys
{"title":"Analysing diagnostic practices and referral pathways for glaucoma in Australian primary eye care.","authors":"Catherine L Jan, Randall S Stafford, Xianwen Shang, Jacqueline Henwood, Christian Davey, Jiahao Liu, Peter van Wijngaarden, George Y X Kong, Jennifer C Fan Gaskin, Mingguang He, Algis Vingrys","doi":"10.1111/opo.13491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally, posing a significant public health challenge in Australia, particularly among individuals aged 55 years and older. As primary health care providers, optometrists play a crucial role in the early diagnosis and management of glaucoma, making them central to efforts aimed at reducing the burden of this sight-threatening condition. This study investigates the practice patterns of Australian optometrists in diagnosing and managing glaucoma, focusing on test utilisation, diagnostic confidence, referral practices and intra- and inter-observer variabilities in grading glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method cross-sectional design was conducted, involving 50 Australian optometrists who graded 120 colour digital retinal photographs for GON and completed an online survey regarding their diagnostic methods and confidence levels. Statistical analyses assessed inter- and intra-observer agreement in GON grading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 82% of optometrists surveyed possessed optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments and 96% had visual field analysers. Despite a majority expressing confidence in glaucoma detection, only 8% felt capable of independently diagnosing the disease and initiating treatment. Inter-observer agreement for glaucoma detection from retinal photographs was moderate (kappa = 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-0.54), while intra-observer agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77). Inter-observer agreement of optometrists was similar to that of ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most optometrists have access to advanced diagnostic tools, know how to appropriately diagnose and manage glaucoma and have similar inter-observer variability when assessing fundus photographs to that of glaucoma sub-specialists, but few feel confident in independently diagnosing and managing glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1211-1220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally, posing a significant public health challenge in Australia, particularly among individuals aged 55 years and older. As primary health care providers, optometrists play a crucial role in the early diagnosis and management of glaucoma, making them central to efforts aimed at reducing the burden of this sight-threatening condition. This study investigates the practice patterns of Australian optometrists in diagnosing and managing glaucoma, focusing on test utilisation, diagnostic confidence, referral practices and intra- and inter-observer variabilities in grading glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).

Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional design was conducted, involving 50 Australian optometrists who graded 120 colour digital retinal photographs for GON and completed an online survey regarding their diagnostic methods and confidence levels. Statistical analyses assessed inter- and intra-observer agreement in GON grading.

Results: The results showed that 82% of optometrists surveyed possessed optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments and 96% had visual field analysers. Despite a majority expressing confidence in glaucoma detection, only 8% felt capable of independently diagnosing the disease and initiating treatment. Inter-observer agreement for glaucoma detection from retinal photographs was moderate (kappa = 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-0.54), while intra-observer agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77). Inter-observer agreement of optometrists was similar to that of ophthalmologists.

Conclusion: Most optometrists have access to advanced diagnostic tools, know how to appropriately diagnose and manage glaucoma and have similar inter-observer variability when assessing fundus photographs to that of glaucoma sub-specialists, but few feel confident in independently diagnosing and managing glaucoma.

分析澳大利亚初级眼保健中青光眼的诊断实践和转诊途径。
背景:青光眼是全球范围内不可逆失明的主要原因,在澳大利亚构成了重大的公共卫生挑战,特别是在55岁及以上的人群中。作为初级卫生保健提供者,验光师在青光眼的早期诊断和管理中发挥着至关重要的作用,使他们成为旨在减轻这种威胁视力的疾病负担的努力的核心。本研究调查了澳大利亚验光师在诊断和管理青光眼方面的实践模式,重点关注测试利用、诊断信心、转诊实践以及青光眼视神经病变(GON)分级的观察者内部和观察者之间的差异。方法:采用混合方法横断面设计,涉及50名澳大利亚验光师,他们对120张彩色数字视网膜照片进行了评分,并完成了一项关于他们的诊断方法和置信度的在线调查。统计分析评估了观察员之间和观察员内部对GON分级的一致性。结果:82%的验光师拥有光学相干断层扫描(OCT)仪器,96%的验光师拥有视野分析仪。尽管大多数人对青光眼的检测有信心,但只有8%的人认为自己有能力独立诊断并开始治疗。从视网膜照片检测青光眼的观察者之间的一致性是中等的(kappa = 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-0.54),而观察者内部的一致性是很大的(kappa = 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77)。验光师与眼科医生的观察者间一致性相似。结论:大多数验光师有先进的诊断工具,知道如何正确诊断和治疗青光眼,在评估眼底照片时,观察者之间的差异与青光眼专科医生相似,但很少有信心独立诊断和治疗青光眼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信