Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma detection and characterization in Spain.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2509-7278
Marco Bustamante-Balén, Beatriz Merino Rodríguez, Luis Barranco, Julen Monje, María Álvarez, Sofía de Pedro, Itziar Oyagüez, Nancy Van Lent, María Mareque
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma detection and characterization in Spain.","authors":"Marco Bustamante-Balén, Beatriz Merino Rodríguez, Luis Barranco, Julen Monje, María Álvarez, Sofía de Pedro, Itziar Oyagüez, Nancy Van Lent, María Mareque","doi":"10.1055/a-2509-7278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of an intelligent endoscopy module for computer-assisted detection and characterization (CADe/CADx) compared with standard practice, from a Spanish National Health System perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model was designed to estimate total costs, life years gained (LYG), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon with annual cycles. A hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients eligible for colonoscopy (mean age 61.32 years) was distributed between Markov states according to polyp size, location, and histology based on national screening program data. CADe/CADx efficacy was determined based on adenoma miss rates and natural disease evolution was simulated according to annual transition probabilities. Detected polyp management involved polypectomy and histopathology in standard practice, whereas with CADe/CADx leave-in-situ strategy was applied for ≤ 5 mm rectosigmoid non-adenomas and resect-and-discard strategy for the rest of ≤ 5mm polyps. Unit costs (€,2024) included the diagnostic procedure and polyp and colorectal cancer (CRC) management. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Model inputs were validated by an expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CADe/CADx was more effective (16.37 LYG and 14.32 QALYs) than standard practice (16.33 LYG and 14.27 QALYs) over a lifetime horizon. Total cost per patient was €2,300.76 with CADe/CADx and €2,508.75 with colonoscopy alone. In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients, CADe/CADx avoided 173 polypectomies, 370 histopathologies, and 7 CRC cases. Sensitivity analyses confirmed model robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this analysis suggest that CADe/CADx would result in a dominant strategy versus standard practice in patients undergoing colonoscopy in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25097278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2509-7278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of an intelligent endoscopy module for computer-assisted detection and characterization (CADe/CADx) compared with standard practice, from a Spanish National Health System perspective.

Methods: A Markov model was designed to estimate total costs, life years gained (LYG), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon with annual cycles. A hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients eligible for colonoscopy (mean age 61.32 years) was distributed between Markov states according to polyp size, location, and histology based on national screening program data. CADe/CADx efficacy was determined based on adenoma miss rates and natural disease evolution was simulated according to annual transition probabilities. Detected polyp management involved polypectomy and histopathology in standard practice, whereas with CADe/CADx leave-in-situ strategy was applied for ≤ 5 mm rectosigmoid non-adenomas and resect-and-discard strategy for the rest of ≤ 5mm polyps. Unit costs (€,2024) included the diagnostic procedure and polyp and colorectal cancer (CRC) management. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Model inputs were validated by an expert panel.

Results: CADe/CADx was more effective (16.37 LYG and 14.32 QALYs) than standard practice (16.33 LYG and 14.27 QALYs) over a lifetime horizon. Total cost per patient was €2,300.76 with CADe/CADx and €2,508.75 with colonoscopy alone. In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients, CADe/CADx avoided 173 polypectomies, 370 histopathologies, and 7 CRC cases. Sensitivity analyses confirmed model robustness.

Conclusions: The results of this analysis suggest that CADe/CADx would result in a dominant strategy versus standard practice in patients undergoing colonoscopy in Spain.

人工智能辅助结肠镜在西班牙用于腺瘤检测和表征的成本-效果分析。
背景和研究目的:本研究的目的是从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度,与标准实践相比,评估用于计算机辅助检测和表征的智能内窥镜模块(CADe/CADx)的成本效益。方法:设计马尔可夫模型,以年为周期估计生命周期内的总成本、获得生命年(LYG)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。根据息肉大小、位置和基于国家筛查项目数据的组织学,假设1000名符合结肠镜检查条件的患者(平均年龄61.32岁)分布在马尔可夫州之间。CADe/CADx疗效根据腺瘤漏报率确定,并根据年转移概率模拟自然疾病演变。在标准实践中,检测到的息肉处理涉及息肉切除术和组织病理学,而CADe/CADx对≤5mm的直肠乙状非腺瘤采用原地保留策略,其余≤5mm的息肉采用切除丢弃策略。单位费用(€2024)包括诊断程序和息肉和结直肠癌(CRC)管理。成本和结果采用3%的年贴现率。模型输入由专家小组验证。结果:CADe/CADx在生命周期内的有效性(16.37 LYG和14.32 QALYs)高于标准做法(16.33 LYG和14.27 QALYs)。每位患者的总费用为CADe/CADx组2,300.76欧元,单独结肠镜检查组2,508.75欧元。在1000例患者的假设队列中,CADe/CADx避免了173例息肉切除术,370例组织病理学和7例CRC病例。敏感性分析证实了模型的稳健性。结论:本分析结果表明,在西班牙接受结肠镜检查的患者中,CADe/CADx将成为一种优势策略,而不是标准做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信