An integrated multi-omics biomarker approach using molecular profiling and microRNAs for evaluation of pancreatic cyst fluid

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mohamed H. Maher PharmD, PhD, Warapen Treekitkarnmongkol PhD, Sayak Ghatak MD, Jianliang Dai PhD, Suyu Liu PhD, Tristian Nguyen BSc, Dzifa Y. Duose PhD, Michael P. Kim MD, Tony Y. Hu PhD, Mark W. Hurd PhD, Pamela L. Paris PhD, Kimberly S. Kirkwood MD, Anirban Maitra MBBS, Rajyalakshmi Luthra PhD, Subrata Sen PhD, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri MD, PhD
{"title":"An integrated multi-omics biomarker approach using molecular profiling and microRNAs for evaluation of pancreatic cyst fluid","authors":"Mohamed H. Maher PharmD, PhD,&nbsp;Warapen Treekitkarnmongkol PhD,&nbsp;Sayak Ghatak MD,&nbsp;Jianliang Dai PhD,&nbsp;Suyu Liu PhD,&nbsp;Tristian Nguyen BSc,&nbsp;Dzifa Y. Duose PhD,&nbsp;Michael P. Kim MD,&nbsp;Tony Y. Hu PhD,&nbsp;Mark W. Hurd PhD,&nbsp;Pamela L. Paris PhD,&nbsp;Kimberly S. Kirkwood MD,&nbsp;Anirban Maitra MBBS,&nbsp;Rajyalakshmi Luthra PhD,&nbsp;Subrata Sen PhD,&nbsp;Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncy.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Classification and risk stratification of pancreatic cysts are challenging because of limited radiographic and cytomorphologic features. Although molecular profiling has emerged as an ancillary test for pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF), additional high-sensitivity and -specificity biomarkers are still needed for improved classification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, PCF from 93 patients, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (<i>n</i> = 65), mucinous cystic neoplasms (<i>n</i> = 9), serous cystadenomas (<i>n</i> = 9), pancreatic cyst not otherwise specified (<i>n</i> = 8), and pseudocysts (<i>n</i> = 2), were evaluated for biomarkers. Molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing was performed, and a subset of the cases (<i>n</i> = 32) were interrogated with 2083 microRNAs (miRNAs) to evaluate their use for pancreatic cyst risk stratification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>As independent PCF biomarkers in 32 cases with histologic diagnoses, three miRNAs performed significantly better than mutant <i>KRAS</i>, mutant <i>GNAS</i>, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in discriminating high-risk from low-risk cysts. The three elevated miRNAs in combination with mutant <i>KRAS</i>, mutant <i>GNAS</i>, and serum CA19-9 displayed similar diagnostic performance (miR-4461: area under the curve [AUC], 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.800–1; miR-6723-5p: AUC, 0.958; 95% CI, 0.850–1; miR-6755-3p: AUC, 0.942; 95% CI, 0.816–1) in discriminating high-risk from low-risk cysts, when compared to mutant <i>KRAS</i>, mutant <i>GNAS</i>, CEA, and serum CA19-9 (AUC, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.825–1). In the absence of CA19-9, the three-marker panel of <i>KRAS</i>, <i>GNAS</i>, and miRNAs showed marginally improved performance compared with <i>KRAS</i>, <i>GNAS</i>, and CEA, which highlights the potential utility of miRNAs as biomarkers in PCF analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings demonstrate that a multiomics biomarker approach with elevated PCF miRNAs with mutant <i>KRAS</i>, mutant <i>GNAS</i>, and serum CA19-9 may help in better detecting high-risk cysts for early clinical intervention.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":"133 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Classification and risk stratification of pancreatic cysts are challenging because of limited radiographic and cytomorphologic features. Although molecular profiling has emerged as an ancillary test for pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF), additional high-sensitivity and -specificity biomarkers are still needed for improved classification.

Methods

In this study, PCF from 93 patients, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (n = 65), mucinous cystic neoplasms (n = 9), serous cystadenomas (n = 9), pancreatic cyst not otherwise specified (n = 8), and pseudocysts (n = 2), were evaluated for biomarkers. Molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing was performed, and a subset of the cases (n = 32) were interrogated with 2083 microRNAs (miRNAs) to evaluate their use for pancreatic cyst risk stratification.

Results

As independent PCF biomarkers in 32 cases with histologic diagnoses, three miRNAs performed significantly better than mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in discriminating high-risk from low-risk cysts. The three elevated miRNAs in combination with mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, and serum CA19-9 displayed similar diagnostic performance (miR-4461: area under the curve [AUC], 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.800–1; miR-6723-5p: AUC, 0.958; 95% CI, 0.850–1; miR-6755-3p: AUC, 0.942; 95% CI, 0.816–1) in discriminating high-risk from low-risk cysts, when compared to mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, CEA, and serum CA19-9 (AUC, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.825–1). In the absence of CA19-9, the three-marker panel of KRAS, GNAS, and miRNAs showed marginally improved performance compared with KRAS, GNAS, and CEA, which highlights the potential utility of miRNAs as biomarkers in PCF analysis.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate that a multiomics biomarker approach with elevated PCF miRNAs with mutant KRAS, mutant GNAS, and serum CA19-9 may help in better detecting high-risk cysts for early clinical intervention.

一种综合的多组学生物标志物方法,使用分子分析和microrna来评估胰腺囊肿液。
背景:由于放射学和细胞形态学特征有限,胰腺囊肿的分类和风险分层具有挑战性。尽管分子谱分析已成为胰腺囊肿液(PCF)的辅助检测,但仍需要额外的高灵敏度和特异性生物标志物来改进分类。方法:在本研究中,对93例PCF患者进行生物标志物评估,包括导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(n = 65)、黏液性囊性肿瘤(n = 9)、浆液性囊腺瘤(n = 9)、未明确说明的胰腺囊肿(n = 8)和假性囊肿(n = 2)。通过下一代测序进行分子谱分析,并使用2083个microrna (mirna)对一部分病例(n = 32)进行询问,以评估其在胰腺囊肿风险分层中的应用。结果:作为32例组织学诊断的独立PCF生物标志物,3种mirna在区分高危和低风险囊肿方面明显优于突变型KRAS、突变型GNAS、癌胚抗原(CEA)和血清碳水化合物抗原19-9 (CA19-9)。三种升高的mirna与突变体KRAS、突变体GNAS和血清CA19-9联合表现出相似的诊断性能(miR-4461:曲线下面积[AUC], 0.950;95%置信区间[CI], 0.800-1;miR-6723-5p: AUC, 0.958;95% ci, 0.850-1;miR-6755-3p: AUC, 0.942;与突变型KRAS、突变型GNAS、CEA和血清CA19-9相比,95% CI, 0.816-1)区分高风险和低风险囊肿(AUC, 0.950;95% ci, 0.825-1)。在缺少CA19-9的情况下,与KRAS、GNAS和CEA相比,KRAS、GNAS和miRNAs的三标记面板的性能略有提高,这突出了miRNAs作为生物标记物在PCF分析中的潜在效用。结论:这些发现表明,结合突变KRAS、突变GNAS和血清CA19-9的PCF mirna升高的多组学生物标志物方法可能有助于更好地检测高危囊肿,以便进行早期临床干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Cytopathology
Cancer Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信