Predicting low birth weight risks in pregnant women in Brazil using machine learning algorithms: data from the Araraquara cohort study.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Audêncio Victor, Francielly Almeida, Sancho Pedro Xavier, Patrícia H C Rondó
{"title":"Predicting low birth weight risks in pregnant women in Brazil using machine learning algorithms: data from the Araraquara cohort study.","authors":"Audêncio Victor, Francielly Almeida, Sancho Pedro Xavier, Patrícia H C Rondó","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07351-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low birth weight (LBW) is a critical factor linked to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Early prediction is essential for timely interventions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate predictive models for LBW using machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Catboost, and LightGBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 1,579 pregnant women enrolled in the Araraquara Cohort, a population-based longitudinal study. Predictor variables included maternal sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral factors. Four ML algorithms Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM, were trained using an 80/20 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. To address class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), F1-score, and precision-recall. Variable importance was evaluated using Shapley values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>XGBoost demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.94, followed by CatBoost (0.94), Random Forest (0.94), and LightGBM (0.94). Maternal gestational age was the most influential predictor, followed by marital status and prenatal care frequency. Behavioral factors, such as physical activity, also contributed to LBW risk. Shapley analysis provided interpretable insights into variable contributions, supporting the clinical applicability of the models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning, combined with SMOTE, proved to be an effective approach for predicting LBW. XGBoost stood out as the most accurate model, but Catboost and Random Forest also provided solid results. These models can be applied to identify high-risk pregnancies, improving perinatal outcomes through early interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07351-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low birth weight (LBW) is a critical factor linked to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Early prediction is essential for timely interventions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate predictive models for LBW using machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Catboost, and LightGBM.

Methods: We analyzed data from 1,579 pregnant women enrolled in the Araraquara Cohort, a population-based longitudinal study. Predictor variables included maternal sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral factors. Four ML algorithms Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM, were trained using an 80/20 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. To address class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), F1-score, and precision-recall. Variable importance was evaluated using Shapley values.

Results: XGBoost demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.94, followed by CatBoost (0.94), Random Forest (0.94), and LightGBM (0.94). Maternal gestational age was the most influential predictor, followed by marital status and prenatal care frequency. Behavioral factors, such as physical activity, also contributed to LBW risk. Shapley analysis provided interpretable insights into variable contributions, supporting the clinical applicability of the models.

Conclusion: Machine learning, combined with SMOTE, proved to be an effective approach for predicting LBW. XGBoost stood out as the most accurate model, but Catboost and Random Forest also provided solid results. These models can be applied to identify high-risk pregnancies, improving perinatal outcomes through early interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信