Self-enactable technique use and physical activity: A comparative qualitative study of habit formation and maintenance.

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Eleonoora Hintsa, Martin S Hagger, Taru Lintunen, Kyra Hamilton, Keegan Knittle
{"title":"Self-enactable technique use and physical activity: A comparative qualitative study of habit formation and maintenance.","authors":"Eleonoora Hintsa, Martin S Hagger, Taru Lintunen, Kyra Hamilton, Keegan Knittle","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is minimal empirical evidence on which techniques effectively promote physical activity habit formation. This qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by identifying the self-enactable techniques that people with varying levels of physical activity experience and habit strength use to support their own physical activity behavior and form or maintain habits. Novice (n = 8), intermediate (n = 8), and expert (n = 8) exercisers were recruited via purposive sampling to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed with deductive content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. Forty-five self-enactable techniques were frequently reported in at least one of the experience groups. Thematic analyses indicated seeming differences in technique use across experience levels, from information seeking and support among novices, to acceptance and overcoming initiation inertia among intermediates, to environmental restructuring and personal growth among experts. Increasing experience also seemed associated with a greater focus on the short-term benefits of physical activity and flexible, broad-based automatic approaches to planning and self-regulation. Within-person longitudinal studies using validated measures that capture nuance in technique use can improve scientific understanding of habit formation processes in physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"17 2","pages":"e70016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is minimal empirical evidence on which techniques effectively promote physical activity habit formation. This qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by identifying the self-enactable techniques that people with varying levels of physical activity experience and habit strength use to support their own physical activity behavior and form or maintain habits. Novice (n = 8), intermediate (n = 8), and expert (n = 8) exercisers were recruited via purposive sampling to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed with deductive content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. Forty-five self-enactable techniques were frequently reported in at least one of the experience groups. Thematic analyses indicated seeming differences in technique use across experience levels, from information seeking and support among novices, to acceptance and overcoming initiation inertia among intermediates, to environmental restructuring and personal growth among experts. Increasing experience also seemed associated with a greater focus on the short-term benefits of physical activity and flexible, broad-based automatic approaches to planning and self-regulation. Within-person longitudinal studies using validated measures that capture nuance in technique use can improve scientific understanding of habit formation processes in physical activity.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信