Fluctuations in dispensed out-patient psychotropic medication prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.867
Damian A Visser, Daphne S Everaerd, Hannah Ellerbroek, Janneke R Zinkstok, Indira Tendolkar, Femke Atsma, Arnt F A Schellekens
{"title":"Fluctuations in dispensed out-patient psychotropic medication prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands.","authors":"Damian A Visser, Daphne S Everaerd, Hannah Ellerbroek, Janneke R Zinkstok, Indira Tendolkar, Femke Atsma, Arnt F A Schellekens","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns had a significant impact on mental well-being and (mental) healthcare systems globally.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe trends and dynamics of out-patient prescribing of psychotropic medications during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Dispensed psychotropic medication prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to March 2022 were retrieved from national registry data. Numbers of total and incident dispensed prescriptions and defined daily doses (DDDs) were identified for six medication groups. Overall pandemic-related changes in prescribing trends were analysed using interrupted time-series analyses. Lockdown-related prescribing dynamics were described using monthly risk ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No overall pandemic-related changes in prescribing were detected, except for alcohol addiction medication, for which a pre-pandemic decline in total dispensed prescriptions and DDDs levelled off during the pandemic: +10 prescriptions per week (95% CI 7-11, <i>P</i> ≤ 0.001) and +111 DDDs per week (95% CI 56-165, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Monthly prescribing dynamics showed transient increases in all medication groups during the second and third lockdown periods. There were decreases in dispensed incident antidepressant and opioid addiction medication prescriptions during the first lockdown (average risk ratios: 0.87 and 0.88 respectively), and DDDs of dispensed incident and total attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication prescriptions and incident benzodiazepine prescriptions were elevated from the end of the second lockdown (average risk ratios: 1.40, 1.12 and 1.17, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings raise concerns regarding possible over- and under-prescribing during the pandemic. Further understanding of specific factors driving these changes is necessary to help prepare for future mental health(care) challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 2","pages":"e64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.867","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns had a significant impact on mental well-being and (mental) healthcare systems globally.

Aims: To describe trends and dynamics of out-patient prescribing of psychotropic medications during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands.

Method: Dispensed psychotropic medication prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to March 2022 were retrieved from national registry data. Numbers of total and incident dispensed prescriptions and defined daily doses (DDDs) were identified for six medication groups. Overall pandemic-related changes in prescribing trends were analysed using interrupted time-series analyses. Lockdown-related prescribing dynamics were described using monthly risk ratios.

Results: No overall pandemic-related changes in prescribing were detected, except for alcohol addiction medication, for which a pre-pandemic decline in total dispensed prescriptions and DDDs levelled off during the pandemic: +10 prescriptions per week (95% CI 7-11, P ≤ 0.001) and +111 DDDs per week (95% CI 56-165, P = 0.001). Monthly prescribing dynamics showed transient increases in all medication groups during the second and third lockdown periods. There were decreases in dispensed incident antidepressant and opioid addiction medication prescriptions during the first lockdown (average risk ratios: 0.87 and 0.88 respectively), and DDDs of dispensed incident and total attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication prescriptions and incident benzodiazepine prescriptions were elevated from the end of the second lockdown (average risk ratios: 1.40, 1.12 and 1.17, respectively).

Conclusions: These findings raise concerns regarding possible over- and under-prescribing during the pandemic. Further understanding of specific factors driving these changes is necessary to help prepare for future mental health(care) challenges.

荷兰COVID-19大流行期间发放的门诊精神药物处方的波动。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行和封锁对全球精神健康和(精神)卫生保健系统产生了重大影响。目的:描述2019冠状病毒病大流行期间荷兰门诊精神药物处方的趋势和动态。方法:检索2020年3月至2022年3月2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的精神药物处方。确定了6个用药组的总处方数和事件分配处方数以及限定日剂量(DDDs)。使用间断时间序列分析分析了处方趋势中与大流行相关的总体变化。使用月度风险比描述了与封锁相关的处方动态。结果:除酒精成瘾药物外,未发现总体上与大流行相关的处方变化,在大流行期间,酒精成瘾药物的总分配处方和DDDs在大流行前下降趋于平稳:每周+10张处方(95% CI 7-11, P≤0.001)和每周+111张DDDs (95% CI 56-165, P = 0.001)。每月处方动态显示,在第二次和第三次封锁期间,所有药物组的短暂增加。在第一次封锁期间,配发的事件抗抑郁药和阿片类药物处方减少(平均风险比分别为0.87和0.88),从第二次封锁结束时起,配发的事件和总注意缺陷多动障碍药物处方和事件苯二氮卓类药物处方的DDDs增加(平均风险比分别为1.40、1.12和1.17)。结论:这些发现引起了人们对大流行期间可能出现的处方过量和不足的担忧。进一步了解推动这些变化的具体因素对于帮助应对未来的精神卫生(保健)挑战是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信