Ultrasound Assessment of Venous and Pulmonary Congestion in Left Ventricular Assist Devices Patients.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Attilio Iacovoni, Cinzia Giaccherini, Sara Paris, Raffaele Abete, Claudia Vittori, Riccardo Maria Inciardi, Ottavio Zucchetti, Amedeo Terzi, Michele Senni
{"title":"Ultrasound Assessment of Venous and Pulmonary Congestion in Left Ventricular Assist Devices Patients.","authors":"Attilio Iacovoni, Cinzia Giaccherini, Sara Paris, Raffaele Abete, Claudia Vittori, Riccardo Maria Inciardi, Ottavio Zucchetti, Amedeo Terzi, Michele Senni","doi":"10.1111/aor.14985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant number of (left ventricular assist device) LVAD patients (pts) have hemodynamic-related adverse events requiring right heart catheterization (RHC). Venous and lung ultrasound is an established method for evaluating congestion in heart failure pts. This study aimed to investigate the role of these ultrasound parameters in the hemodynamic assessment of LVAD pts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RHC and complete echocardiography were performed on 50 consecutive LVAD pts, 12 of whom were the validation cohort. Pts were stratified based on right atrial pressure (RAP) ≥ 7 mmHg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > 15 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median LVAD follow-up time was 400 (209-900) days. Baseline characteristics were similar between high vs. normal RAP groups, except for NYHA class and renal function in the former group. High vs. normal PCWP showed a greater NYHA class and a furosemide dose. All hemodynamic parameters were significantly different in the high RAP group except for cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI). In contrast, in the high PCWP group, no differences in CO, CI, and pulmonary vascular resistances were apparent. The most accurate non-invasive variable for detecting high RAP was renal venous stasis index (RVSI), receiver-operating characteristic curves for areas under the curve (AUC), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.93). Estimated left atrial pressure (LAP-eRAP) was the most accurate non-invasive value to discriminate high PCWP (AUC 0.85 95% CI 0.73-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a good correlation between RAP, PWCP, and non-invasive parameters, such as RVSI and LAP-eRAP, suggesting the importance of peripheral venous ultrasound in LVAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A significant number of (left ventricular assist device) LVAD patients (pts) have hemodynamic-related adverse events requiring right heart catheterization (RHC). Venous and lung ultrasound is an established method for evaluating congestion in heart failure pts. This study aimed to investigate the role of these ultrasound parameters in the hemodynamic assessment of LVAD pts.

Methods: RHC and complete echocardiography were performed on 50 consecutive LVAD pts, 12 of whom were the validation cohort. Pts were stratified based on right atrial pressure (RAP) ≥ 7 mmHg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > 15 mmHg.

Results: The median LVAD follow-up time was 400 (209-900) days. Baseline characteristics were similar between high vs. normal RAP groups, except for NYHA class and renal function in the former group. High vs. normal PCWP showed a greater NYHA class and a furosemide dose. All hemodynamic parameters were significantly different in the high RAP group except for cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI). In contrast, in the high PCWP group, no differences in CO, CI, and pulmonary vascular resistances were apparent. The most accurate non-invasive variable for detecting high RAP was renal venous stasis index (RVSI), receiver-operating characteristic curves for areas under the curve (AUC), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.93). Estimated left atrial pressure (LAP-eRAP) was the most accurate non-invasive value to discriminate high PCWP (AUC 0.85 95% CI 0.73-0.98).

Conclusion: This study found a good correlation between RAP, PWCP, and non-invasive parameters, such as RVSI and LAP-eRAP, suggesting the importance of peripheral venous ultrasound in LVAD patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信