Perceptions of Telemedicine Among Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Patients and Healthcare Providers.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Gabrielle Gilmer, Gwendolyn Sowa
{"title":"Perceptions of Telemedicine Among Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Patients and Healthcare Providers.","authors":"Gabrielle Gilmer, Gwendolyn Sowa","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our purpose was to assess perceptions of telemedicine among physical medicine and rehabilitation patients and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 28-question online survey was conducted. Patients had to be 18 yrs or older who used telemedicine for a physical medicine and rehabilitation visit. Providers had to be a board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation provider who has used telemedicine in their practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients and 46 providers completed the survey. Patients and providers reported an intention to continue using telemedicine, regardless of insurance coverage/reimbursement. Patients and providers reported circumstances, such as needing a physical examination or a first-time visit, as being preferable for an in-person visit. Patients who were younger or a caretaker were more likely to report being willing to change providers if telemedicine was no longer offered than older or noncaretaker patients. Patients who made less than $30,000 annually or who did not own a car were more likely to report comfortability with telemedicine than patients who made more than $30,000 annually or who owned a car.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine will continue as a staple of physical medicine and rehabilitation health care and is a particularly important resource for patients who are younger, caretakers, make less than $30,000 annually, or do not own a car.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":"104 4","pages":"349-356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to assess perceptions of telemedicine among physical medicine and rehabilitation patients and healthcare providers.

Design: A 28-question online survey was conducted. Patients had to be 18 yrs or older who used telemedicine for a physical medicine and rehabilitation visit. Providers had to be a board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation provider who has used telemedicine in their practice.

Results: Sixty-eight patients and 46 providers completed the survey. Patients and providers reported an intention to continue using telemedicine, regardless of insurance coverage/reimbursement. Patients and providers reported circumstances, such as needing a physical examination or a first-time visit, as being preferable for an in-person visit. Patients who were younger or a caretaker were more likely to report being willing to change providers if telemedicine was no longer offered than older or noncaretaker patients. Patients who made less than $30,000 annually or who did not own a car were more likely to report comfortability with telemedicine than patients who made more than $30,000 annually or who owned a car.

Conclusions: Telemedicine will continue as a staple of physical medicine and rehabilitation health care and is a particularly important resource for patients who are younger, caretakers, make less than $30,000 annually, or do not own a car.

物理医学和康复患者和医疗保健提供者对远程医疗的看法。
目的:我们的目的是评估物理医学和康复患者和医疗保健提供者对远程医疗的看法。设计:进行了一项包含28个问题的在线调查。使用远程医疗进行物理医学和康复访问的患者必须年满18岁或以上。提供者必须是委员会认证的物理医学和康复提供者,并在其实践中使用远程医疗。结果:68名患者和46名提供者完成了调查。患者和提供者报告说,无论保险范围/报销情况如何,他们都打算继续使用远程医疗。患者和提供者报告的情况,如需要身体检查或第一次就诊,更可取的是亲自就诊。如果不再提供远程医疗,较年轻或有看护人的患者比较年长或无看护人的患者更有可能报告愿意更换提供者。年收入低于3万美元或没有车的患者比年收入超过3万美元或有车的患者更愿意接受远程医疗。结论:远程医疗将继续作为物理医学和康复保健的主要内容,对于年轻、照顾者、年收入低于3万美元或没有汽车的患者来说,是一种特别重要的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信