Retrospective comparative cohort analysis of Darn and Lichtenstein repair methods for bilateral inguinal hernias in adult males in a low-resource setting: a single-centre study in Sudan.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002859
Alsadig Suliman, Reem Mohamed Osman, Hiba Suliman
{"title":"Retrospective comparative cohort analysis of Darn and Lichtenstein repair methods for bilateral inguinal hernias in adult males in a low-resource setting: a single-centre study in Sudan.","authors":"Alsadig Suliman, Reem Mohamed Osman, Hiba Suliman","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal hernias are a common surgical condition that, if untreated, can lead to severe complications. Bilateral inguinal hernias add challenges due to increased recurrence and postoperative risks. Although Lichtenstein repair, a mesh-based approach, is the gold standard for its low recurrence, Darn repair - a mesh-free technique - offers a cost-effective alternative in low-resource settings. This study assesses the applicability and effectiveness of both techniques for bilateral inguinal hernias in a resource-limited environment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from Al-Waleedeen Specialized Hospital (IRB number WAD.12.01.2021), a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 75 adult males who underwent bilateral inguinal hernia repair from January 2021 to October 2023 in Sudan. Patients were divided into Group A (Lichtenstein, n = 30) and Group B (Darn, n = 45). Data on operative time, complications, hospital stay, return to normal activities, patient satisfaction, and economic impact were collected, with a three-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Darn repair showed fewer postoperative complications, particularly lower surgical site infections (SSI) (8% vs. 20%, <i>P</i> = 0.014). It also had shorter operative times (mean 30 minutes less), reduced hospital stays (1.5 vs. 2.8 days, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and lower costs. Recurrence rates were comparable across both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both methods yielded similar recurrence rates, Darn repair showed advantages in resource-limited settings, with fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs, making it a practical option when mesh is not readily available. Limitations include retrospective design, convenience sampling, and possible recall bias from phone follow-ups. The three-month follow-up may not capture long-term outcomes like chronic pain or late recurrences. Future studies should extend follow-ups and conduct prospective trials to optimize Darn repair across diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 2","pages":"555-564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inguinal hernias are a common surgical condition that, if untreated, can lead to severe complications. Bilateral inguinal hernias add challenges due to increased recurrence and postoperative risks. Although Lichtenstein repair, a mesh-based approach, is the gold standard for its low recurrence, Darn repair - a mesh-free technique - offers a cost-effective alternative in low-resource settings. This study assesses the applicability and effectiveness of both techniques for bilateral inguinal hernias in a resource-limited environment.

Materials and methods: With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from Al-Waleedeen Specialized Hospital (IRB number WAD.12.01.2021), a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 75 adult males who underwent bilateral inguinal hernia repair from January 2021 to October 2023 in Sudan. Patients were divided into Group A (Lichtenstein, n = 30) and Group B (Darn, n = 45). Data on operative time, complications, hospital stay, return to normal activities, patient satisfaction, and economic impact were collected, with a three-month follow-up.

Results: Darn repair showed fewer postoperative complications, particularly lower surgical site infections (SSI) (8% vs. 20%, P = 0.014). It also had shorter operative times (mean 30 minutes less), reduced hospital stays (1.5 vs. 2.8 days, P < 0.0001), and lower costs. Recurrence rates were comparable across both groups.

Conclusion: While both methods yielded similar recurrence rates, Darn repair showed advantages in resource-limited settings, with fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs, making it a practical option when mesh is not readily available. Limitations include retrospective design, convenience sampling, and possible recall bias from phone follow-ups. The three-month follow-up may not capture long-term outcomes like chronic pain or late recurrences. Future studies should extend follow-ups and conduct prospective trials to optimize Darn repair across diverse settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信