{"title":"Pacifiers: Common Questions and Answers.","authors":"David S Garcia, Kara W Garcia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients commonly seek guidance about the risks and benefits of pacifiers as well as when and how to wean children from them. Various types of pacifiers appear to have similar risks and benefits. The benefits of pacifier use include reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome, decreased discomfort during air travel, and pain control during intramuscular injections, venipuncture, and heel sticks. Associated risks include potential negative effects on the initiation of breastfeeding, dental malocclusion, dental caries (when sugar is added), and otitis media. To mitigate the risk of dental caries, caregivers should avoid adding sugar to pacifiers. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends using a single-piece pacifier with a soft nipple and a shield at least 1.5 inches in diameter with ventilation holes. The American Academy of Pediatrics also recommends delaying pacifier use until breastfeeding is well established, offering a pacifier when putting an infant to sleep, not reinserting pacifiers once an infant is asleep, and not forcing an infant to use a pacifier. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends weaning pacifier use during the second 6 months of life to decrease the risk of otitis media. The optimal time to wean a child from a pacifier is unknown, but health risks appear to increase after 12 months of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":7713,"journal":{"name":"American family physician","volume":"111 3","pages":"230-235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American family physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patients commonly seek guidance about the risks and benefits of pacifiers as well as when and how to wean children from them. Various types of pacifiers appear to have similar risks and benefits. The benefits of pacifier use include reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome, decreased discomfort during air travel, and pain control during intramuscular injections, venipuncture, and heel sticks. Associated risks include potential negative effects on the initiation of breastfeeding, dental malocclusion, dental caries (when sugar is added), and otitis media. To mitigate the risk of dental caries, caregivers should avoid adding sugar to pacifiers. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends using a single-piece pacifier with a soft nipple and a shield at least 1.5 inches in diameter with ventilation holes. The American Academy of Pediatrics also recommends delaying pacifier use until breastfeeding is well established, offering a pacifier when putting an infant to sleep, not reinserting pacifiers once an infant is asleep, and not forcing an infant to use a pacifier. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends weaning pacifier use during the second 6 months of life to decrease the risk of otitis media. The optimal time to wean a child from a pacifier is unknown, but health risks appear to increase after 12 months of age.
患者通常会寻求有关安抚奶嘴的风险和益处以及何时和如何让孩子断奶的指导。各种类型的奶嘴似乎有类似的风险和好处。使用安抚奶嘴的好处包括降低婴儿猝死综合症的风险,减少航空旅行时的不适,以及控制肌肉注射、静脉穿刺和贴脚跟时的疼痛。相关风险包括对开始母乳喂养、牙齿错颌、龋齿(添加糖时)和中耳炎的潜在负面影响。为了减少龋齿的风险,护理人员应该避免在奶嘴中添加糖。美国儿科学会(American Academy of Pediatrics)建议使用带有柔软奶嘴的单件式奶嘴,奶嘴的护罩直径至少为1.5英寸,并带有通气孔。美国儿科学会(American Academy of Pediatrics)还建议,在母乳喂养完全建立之后再使用安抚奶嘴,在哄婴儿入睡时提供安抚奶嘴,在婴儿睡着后不要重新插入安抚奶嘴,也不要强迫婴儿使用安抚奶嘴。美国儿科学会建议在婴儿出生后6个月停用奶嘴,以降低患中耳炎的风险。孩子断奶的最佳时间尚不清楚,但健康风险似乎在12个月后增加。
期刊介绍:
American Family Physician is a semimonthly, editorially independent, peer-reviewed journal of the American Academy of Family Physicians. AFP’s chief objective is to provide high-quality continuing medical education for more than 190,000 family physicians and other primary care clinicians. The editors prefer original articles from experienced clinicians who write succinct, evidence-based, authoritative clinical reviews that will assist family physicians in patient care. AFP considers only manuscripts that are original, have not been published previously, and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Articles that demonstrate a family medicine perspective on and approach to a common clinical condition are particularly desirable.