Pacifiers: Common Questions and Answers.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
American family physician Pub Date : 2025-03-01
David S Garcia, Kara W Garcia
{"title":"Pacifiers: Common Questions and Answers.","authors":"David S Garcia, Kara W Garcia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients commonly seek guidance about the risks and benefits of pacifiers as well as when and how to wean children from them. Various types of pacifiers appear to have similar risks and benefits. The benefits of pacifier use include reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome, decreased discomfort during air travel, and pain control during intramuscular injections, venipuncture, and heel sticks. Associated risks include potential negative effects on the initiation of breastfeeding, dental malocclusion, dental caries (when sugar is added), and otitis media. To mitigate the risk of dental caries, caregivers should avoid adding sugar to pacifiers. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends using a single-piece pacifier with a soft nipple and a shield at least 1.5 inches in diameter with ventilation holes. The American Academy of Pediatrics also recommends delaying pacifier use until breastfeeding is well established, offering a pacifier when putting an infant to sleep, not reinserting pacifiers once an infant is asleep, and not forcing an infant to use a pacifier. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends weaning pacifier use during the second 6 months of life to decrease the risk of otitis media. The optimal time to wean a child from a pacifier is unknown, but health risks appear to increase after 12 months of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":7713,"journal":{"name":"American family physician","volume":"111 3","pages":"230-235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American family physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients commonly seek guidance about the risks and benefits of pacifiers as well as when and how to wean children from them. Various types of pacifiers appear to have similar risks and benefits. The benefits of pacifier use include reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome, decreased discomfort during air travel, and pain control during intramuscular injections, venipuncture, and heel sticks. Associated risks include potential negative effects on the initiation of breastfeeding, dental malocclusion, dental caries (when sugar is added), and otitis media. To mitigate the risk of dental caries, caregivers should avoid adding sugar to pacifiers. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends using a single-piece pacifier with a soft nipple and a shield at least 1.5 inches in diameter with ventilation holes. The American Academy of Pediatrics also recommends delaying pacifier use until breastfeeding is well established, offering a pacifier when putting an infant to sleep, not reinserting pacifiers once an infant is asleep, and not forcing an infant to use a pacifier. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends weaning pacifier use during the second 6 months of life to decrease the risk of otitis media. The optimal time to wean a child from a pacifier is unknown, but health risks appear to increase after 12 months of age.

安抚奶嘴:常见问题和答案。
患者通常会寻求有关安抚奶嘴的风险和益处以及何时和如何让孩子断奶的指导。各种类型的奶嘴似乎有类似的风险和好处。使用安抚奶嘴的好处包括降低婴儿猝死综合症的风险,减少航空旅行时的不适,以及控制肌肉注射、静脉穿刺和贴脚跟时的疼痛。相关风险包括对开始母乳喂养、牙齿错颌、龋齿(添加糖时)和中耳炎的潜在负面影响。为了减少龋齿的风险,护理人员应该避免在奶嘴中添加糖。美国儿科学会(American Academy of Pediatrics)建议使用带有柔软奶嘴的单件式奶嘴,奶嘴的护罩直径至少为1.5英寸,并带有通气孔。美国儿科学会(American Academy of Pediatrics)还建议,在母乳喂养完全建立之后再使用安抚奶嘴,在哄婴儿入睡时提供安抚奶嘴,在婴儿睡着后不要重新插入安抚奶嘴,也不要强迫婴儿使用安抚奶嘴。美国儿科学会建议在婴儿出生后6个月停用奶嘴,以降低患中耳炎的风险。孩子断奶的最佳时间尚不清楚,但健康风险似乎在12个月后增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American family physician
American family physician 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
368
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Family Physician is a semimonthly, editorially independent, peer-reviewed journal of the American Academy of Family Physicians. AFP’s chief objective is to provide high-quality continuing medical education for more than 190,000 family physicians and other primary care clinicians. The editors prefer original articles from experienced clinicians who write succinct, evidence-based, authoritative clinical reviews that will assist family physicians in patient care. AFP considers only manuscripts that are original, have not been published previously, and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Articles that demonstrate a family medicine perspective on and approach to a common clinical condition are particularly desirable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信