Impact of being lateral and sitting position for spinal anesthesia administration on maternal hemodynamic variability and the timing of hypotension among cesarean section patients in a resource-constrained area: a prospective observational cohort study.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002754
Sintayehu Samuel, Blen Kasahun, Tsegaye Demeke, Seleman Reshad, Nesredin Shemsu, Abdulkadir Kedir, Astemamagn Achule, Temesgen Mamo, Getahun Dendir, Sinishaw Genetu, Yisehak Wolde
{"title":"Impact of being lateral and sitting position for spinal anesthesia administration on maternal hemodynamic variability and the timing of hypotension among cesarean section patients in a resource-constrained area: a prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Sintayehu Samuel, Blen Kasahun, Tsegaye Demeke, Seleman Reshad, Nesredin Shemsu, Abdulkadir Kedir, Astemamagn Achule, Temesgen Mamo, Getahun Dendir, Sinishaw Genetu, Yisehak Wolde","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type of anesthesia used for cesarean section can be general, spinal, or epidural. However, peripheral nerve blocks, such as the lower and upper extremity nerve blocks, can be referred to as other types of anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia is the most frequently used method because of its ease, dependability, and rapidity in attaining proper anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of spinal anesthesia induction position on maternal hemodynamics and the timing of hypotension.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective observational cohort study design was employed. A simple random sampling technique was used. A total of 190 patients received spinal anesthesia, with 95 in the lateral and 95 in the sitting position in each group. The data were entered into Epi Data version 4.6 and then exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Independent sample <i>t</i>-tests and chi-square (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>) tests were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used and <i>P</i> value ≤0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence rates of hypotension in the lateral and sitting groups were 54.6% [95% CI, 52.3-72.1] and 73.8% [95% CI, 69.8-87.2], respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.025). The timing of first hypotension was 8.86 minute [95% CI, 8.690-13.272] and 15.75 minute [95% CI, 14.569-19.372] (<i>P</i> = 0.001) for sitting and lateral, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>In this study, we found a significant difference between the lateral and sitting groups with different measurement parameters, such as blood pressure, intraoperative adverse events, and onset of hypotension. The incidence of hypotension, intraoperative adverse effects of spinal anesthesia, and fluid consumption were lower in the lateral groups. Nonetheless, instead of being technically challenging during spinal anesthesia induction, the lateral position results in better hemodynamics and onset of hypotension than in the sitting posture.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 1","pages":"62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type of anesthesia used for cesarean section can be general, spinal, or epidural. However, peripheral nerve blocks, such as the lower and upper extremity nerve blocks, can be referred to as other types of anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia is the most frequently used method because of its ease, dependability, and rapidity in attaining proper anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of spinal anesthesia induction position on maternal hemodynamics and the timing of hypotension.

Method: A prospective observational cohort study design was employed. A simple random sampling technique was used. A total of 190 patients received spinal anesthesia, with 95 in the lateral and 95 in the sitting position in each group. The data were entered into Epi Data version 4.6 and then exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Independent sample t-tests and chi-square (χ 2) tests were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used and P value ≤0.05 considered significant.

Results: The overall incidence rates of hypotension in the lateral and sitting groups were 54.6% [95% CI, 52.3-72.1] and 73.8% [95% CI, 69.8-87.2], respectively (P = 0.025). The timing of first hypotension was 8.86 minute [95% CI, 8.690-13.272] and 15.75 minute [95% CI, 14.569-19.372] (P = 0.001) for sitting and lateral, respectively.

Conclusion and recommendation: In this study, we found a significant difference between the lateral and sitting groups with different measurement parameters, such as blood pressure, intraoperative adverse events, and onset of hypotension. The incidence of hypotension, intraoperative adverse effects of spinal anesthesia, and fluid consumption were lower in the lateral groups. Nonetheless, instead of being technically challenging during spinal anesthesia induction, the lateral position results in better hemodynamics and onset of hypotension than in the sitting posture.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信