Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Versus Without Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.
Abhishek Chaturvedi, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Matteo Cellamare, Parul Chandrika, Waiel Abusnina, Cheng Zhang, Ron Waksman
{"title":"Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Versus Without Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.","authors":"Abhishek Chaturvedi, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Matteo Cellamare, Parul Chandrika, Waiel Abusnina, Cheng Zhang, Ron Waksman","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome, but there is no clear consensus on the choice and timing of revascularization strategy. Recent data from outside the United States suggested similar inpatient mortality after primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PPCI) in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) secondary to SCAD versus non-SCAD. Utilizing similar methodologies in a contemporary US cohort, we found that SCAD patients had higher inpatient mortality after PPCI for STEMI compared with non-SCAD patients. We also found that the SCAD group had prolonged hospitalization and hospitalization costs compared with on-SCAD patients. Furthermore, these trends have not changed over the past 5 years. Our findings reiterate the need for continued discussion and research on the role and timing of PPCI in SCAD-STEMI patients in well-designed prospective cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome, but there is no clear consensus on the choice and timing of revascularization strategy. Recent data from outside the United States suggested similar inpatient mortality after primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PPCI) in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) secondary to SCAD versus non-SCAD. Utilizing similar methodologies in a contemporary US cohort, we found that SCAD patients had higher inpatient mortality after PPCI for STEMI compared with non-SCAD patients. We also found that the SCAD group had prolonged hospitalization and hospitalization costs compared with on-SCAD patients. Furthermore, these trends have not changed over the past 5 years. Our findings reiterate the need for continued discussion and research on the role and timing of PPCI in SCAD-STEMI patients in well-designed prospective cohorts.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.