Value of CODAC classification in identifying causes of stillbirths.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Karima Mekni, Hyem Khiari, Ameni Tissaoui, Khaoula Belaid, Imène Habassi, Chiraz Elfekih
{"title":"Value of CODAC classification in identifying causes of stillbirths.","authors":"Karima Mekni, Hyem Khiari, Ameni Tissaoui, Khaoula Belaid, Imène Habassi, Chiraz Elfekih","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-07955-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stillbirth is a public health problem and one of the main obstetrical complications of pregnancy that practitioners can ever witness. A careful etiological investigation and a search for risk factors is necessary. The main objective of our study was to identify the causes of stillbirths using the CODAC classification system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a monocentric retrospective descriptive study conducted over 5 years in our gynecology department. We collected 114 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall frequency was 8.26 ‰. The average age of women was 32.19 years. Women came from an urban environment in 48.2% and had a low level of education in 54.4% of cases. Our patients were moderately obese (48%). A history of stillbirth was found in 33 cases (28.9%), and the average term of pregnancy was 32 weeks' gestation. Pregnancy was poorly monitored in 2/3 of the population studied. The most frequent reason for consultation was a decrease/absence of fetal movement perception (30%). Labor was induced in 53.5% of deliveries. Delivery was by vaginal route in 58% of cases and the male sex was predominant (61%). For funicular anomalies, a placental abruption was found in 21.1% of cases, and a cord loop in 11.4%. For the etiological investigation via the CODAC classification, maternal pathologies were the most frequent with 28.07% of cases dominated by hypertension. Placental pathologies (placental abruption) and cord abnormalities (cord loop) represented, respectively, 22 and 21.05%. An unexplained cause was found in 20.17%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For the etiological investigation, we relied on the CODAC classification to minimize unexplained causes. This etiological investigation is essential not only to provide answers for the bereaved couple but also to prevent the recurrence of such incidents in subsequent pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-07955-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Stillbirth is a public health problem and one of the main obstetrical complications of pregnancy that practitioners can ever witness. A careful etiological investigation and a search for risk factors is necessary. The main objective of our study was to identify the causes of stillbirths using the CODAC classification system.

Methods: It was a monocentric retrospective descriptive study conducted over 5 years in our gynecology department. We collected 114 cases.

Results: The overall frequency was 8.26 ‰. The average age of women was 32.19 years. Women came from an urban environment in 48.2% and had a low level of education in 54.4% of cases. Our patients were moderately obese (48%). A history of stillbirth was found in 33 cases (28.9%), and the average term of pregnancy was 32 weeks' gestation. Pregnancy was poorly monitored in 2/3 of the population studied. The most frequent reason for consultation was a decrease/absence of fetal movement perception (30%). Labor was induced in 53.5% of deliveries. Delivery was by vaginal route in 58% of cases and the male sex was predominant (61%). For funicular anomalies, a placental abruption was found in 21.1% of cases, and a cord loop in 11.4%. For the etiological investigation via the CODAC classification, maternal pathologies were the most frequent with 28.07% of cases dominated by hypertension. Placental pathologies (placental abruption) and cord abnormalities (cord loop) represented, respectively, 22 and 21.05%. An unexplained cause was found in 20.17%.

Conclusions: For the etiological investigation, we relied on the CODAC classification to minimize unexplained causes. This etiological investigation is essential not only to provide answers for the bereaved couple but also to prevent the recurrence of such incidents in subsequent pregnancies.

CODAC分类在确定死产原因中的价值。
目的:死产是一个公共卫生问题和一个主要的产科并发症的怀孕,从业人员可以亲眼目睹。仔细的病因调查和寻找危险因素是必要的。我们研究的主要目的是使用CODAC分类系统确定死产的原因。方法:采用单中心回顾性描述性研究,历时5年。我们收集了114例病例。结果:总频次为8.26‰。女性的平均年龄为32.19岁。48.2%的女性来自城市环境,54.4%的女性受教育程度较低。我们的患者为中度肥胖(48%)。死产史33例(28.9%),平均妊娠期32周。在被研究的人群中,有三分之二的人孕期监测不佳。最常见的咨询原因是胎动知觉减少或缺失(30%)。53.5%的分娩是引产。58%的病例经阴道分娩,男性占多数(61%)。对于缆索异常,21.1%的病例发现胎盘早剥,11.4%的病例发现脐带环。在CODAC分型的病因调查中,产妇病理最多,28.07%的病例以高血压为主。胎盘病理(胎盘早剥)和脐带异常(脐带环)分别占22%和21.05%。原因不明的占20.17%。结论:对于病因调查,我们依靠CODAC分类来减少无法解释的原因。这种病因调查不仅对为失去亲人的夫妇提供答案,而且对防止此类事件在随后的怀孕中再次发生至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信