Prognostic impact of metabolic tumor volume using the SUV4.0 segmentation threshold in 1,960 lymphoma patients from prospective LYSA trials

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Solène Malmon, Mad-Helenie Elsensohn, Catherine Thieblemont, Franck Morschhauser, Olivier Casasnovas, Marc André, Steven Le Gouill, Yassine Al Tabaa, Paul Bland Durand, Clement Bailly, Veronique Edeline, Lavinia Vija, Laetitia Vercellino, Romain Ricci, Salim Kanoun, Anne-Ségolène Cottereau
{"title":"Prognostic impact of metabolic tumor volume using the SUV4.0 segmentation threshold in 1,960 lymphoma patients from prospective LYSA trials","authors":"Solène Malmon, Mad-Helenie Elsensohn, Catherine Thieblemont, Franck Morschhauser, Olivier Casasnovas, Marc André, Steven Le Gouill, Yassine Al Tabaa, Paul Bland Durand, Clement Bailly, Veronique Edeline, Lavinia Vija, Laetitia Vercellino, Romain Ricci, Salim Kanoun, Anne-Ségolène Cottereau","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07176-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study compared the prognostic value of total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) in lymphoma measured with the recently proposed SUV4.0 segmentation threshold versus the 41% SUVmax across LYSA trials and its impact on intensity and dissemination PET features.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 1960 baseline PET/CT scans of Diffuse Large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients were collected. After a semi-automatic preselection of region of interest, two different segmentation threshold were applied: 41% SUVmax (TMTV<sub>41%</sub>) and SUV &gt; 4.0 (TMTV<sub>4.0</sub>).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The correlation between TMTV<sub>4.0</sub> and TMTV<sub>41%</sub> was ρ = 0.90 for DLBCL, ρ = 0.65 for FL and ρ = 0.60 for HL. For SUVmax, SUVpeak, Dmax and Dbulk features, a strong correlation was observed with ρ &gt; 0.95 whatever the lymphoma subtypes. The predictability of TMTV was high and comparable for the two methods with superimposable confidence intervals for the three subtypes. At the 90th percentile TMTV value, the predicted 7-year PFS was 51.13% with TMTV<sub>4.0</sub> vs. 49.7% with TMTV<sub>41%</sub> for DLBCL patients, 45.5% vs. 39.8% for FL patients, and 82.6% vs. 80.5% for HL patients. A minority of patients showed a predicted PFS deviation &gt; 10% between the two methods: 2.33% in DLBCL, 6.51% in FL and 1% in HL.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>TMTV measured with the SUV4.0 threshold provides a comparable PFS prediction than the 41%SUVmax method supporting its routine adoption particularly in the diffuse large B cell lymphoma subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07176-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared the prognostic value of total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) in lymphoma measured with the recently proposed SUV4.0 segmentation threshold versus the 41% SUVmax across LYSA trials and its impact on intensity and dissemination PET features.

Methods

A total of 1960 baseline PET/CT scans of Diffuse Large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients were collected. After a semi-automatic preselection of region of interest, two different segmentation threshold were applied: 41% SUVmax (TMTV41%) and SUV > 4.0 (TMTV4.0).

Results

The correlation between TMTV4.0 and TMTV41% was ρ = 0.90 for DLBCL, ρ = 0.65 for FL and ρ = 0.60 for HL. For SUVmax, SUVpeak, Dmax and Dbulk features, a strong correlation was observed with ρ > 0.95 whatever the lymphoma subtypes. The predictability of TMTV was high and comparable for the two methods with superimposable confidence intervals for the three subtypes. At the 90th percentile TMTV value, the predicted 7-year PFS was 51.13% with TMTV4.0 vs. 49.7% with TMTV41% for DLBCL patients, 45.5% vs. 39.8% for FL patients, and 82.6% vs. 80.5% for HL patients. A minority of patients showed a predicted PFS deviation > 10% between the two methods: 2.33% in DLBCL, 6.51% in FL and 1% in HL.

Conclusion

TMTV measured with the SUV4.0 threshold provides a comparable PFS prediction than the 41%SUVmax method supporting its routine adoption particularly in the diffuse large B cell lymphoma subtype.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信