Reduced Erosion Augments Soil Carbon Storage Under Cover Crops

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Wenjuan Huang, Lifen Jiang, Jian Zhou, Hyung-Sub Kim, Jingfeng Xiao, Yiqi Luo
{"title":"Reduced Erosion Augments Soil Carbon Storage Under Cover Crops","authors":"Wenjuan Huang,&nbsp;Lifen Jiang,&nbsp;Jian Zhou,&nbsp;Hyung-Sub Kim,&nbsp;Jingfeng Xiao,&nbsp;Yiqi Luo","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crops, a promising strategy to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in croplands and mitigate climate change, have typically been shown to benefit soil carbon (C) storage from increased plant C inputs. However, input-driven C benefits may be augmented by the reduction of C outputs induced by cover crops, a process that has been tested by individual studies but has not yet been synthesized. Here we quantified the impact of cover crops on organic C loss via soil erosion (SOC erosion) and revealed the geographical variability at the global scale. We analyzed the field data from 152 paired control and cover crop treatments from 57 published studies worldwide using meta-analysis and machine learning. The meta-analysis results showed that cover crops widely reduced SOC erosion by an average of 68% on an annual basis, while they increased SOC stock by 14% (0–15 cm). The absolute SOC erosion reduction ranged from 0 to 18.0 Mg C<sup>−1</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> and showed no correlation with the SOC stock change that varied from −8.07 to 22.6 Mg C<sup>−1</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> at 0–15 cm depth, indicating the latter more likely related to plant C inputs. The magnitude of SOC erosion reduction was dominantly determined by topographic slope. The global map generated by machine learning showed the relative effectiveness of SOC erosion reduction mainly occurred in temperate regions, including central Europe, central-east China, and Southern South America. Our results highlight that cover crop-induced erosion reduction can augment SOC stock to provide additive C benefits, especially in sloping and temperate croplands, for mitigating climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cover crops, a promising strategy to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in croplands and mitigate climate change, have typically been shown to benefit soil carbon (C) storage from increased plant C inputs. However, input-driven C benefits may be augmented by the reduction of C outputs induced by cover crops, a process that has been tested by individual studies but has not yet been synthesized. Here we quantified the impact of cover crops on organic C loss via soil erosion (SOC erosion) and revealed the geographical variability at the global scale. We analyzed the field data from 152 paired control and cover crop treatments from 57 published studies worldwide using meta-analysis and machine learning. The meta-analysis results showed that cover crops widely reduced SOC erosion by an average of 68% on an annual basis, while they increased SOC stock by 14% (0–15 cm). The absolute SOC erosion reduction ranged from 0 to 18.0 Mg C−1 ha−1 year−1 and showed no correlation with the SOC stock change that varied from −8.07 to 22.6 Mg C−1 ha−1 year−1 at 0–15 cm depth, indicating the latter more likely related to plant C inputs. The magnitude of SOC erosion reduction was dominantly determined by topographic slope. The global map generated by machine learning showed the relative effectiveness of SOC erosion reduction mainly occurred in temperate regions, including central Europe, central-east China, and Southern South America. Our results highlight that cover crop-induced erosion reduction can augment SOC stock to provide additive C benefits, especially in sloping and temperate croplands, for mitigating climate change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

减少侵蚀增加了覆盖作物下的土壤碳储量
覆盖作物是增加农田土壤有机碳(SOC)储存和缓解气候变化的一种有前景的策略,通常已被证明可以通过增加植物C输入来促进土壤碳(C)储存。然而,投入驱动的碳效益可能会因覆盖作物导致的碳产出减少而增加,这一过程已经过个别研究的检验,但尚未综合。本研究量化了覆盖作物对土壤侵蚀导致的有机碳流失的影响,揭示了其在全球尺度上的地理变异。我们使用荟萃分析和机器学习分析了来自全球57项已发表研究的152对对照和覆盖作物处理的田间数据。meta分析结果表明,覆盖作物广泛地减少了土壤有机碳侵蚀,年平均减少了68%,同时使土壤有机碳储量(0 ~ 15 cm)增加了14%。土壤有机碳侵蚀的绝对减少幅度为0 ~ 18.0 Mg C−1 ha−1年−1,与0 ~ 15 cm深度土壤有机碳储量变化幅度为- 8.07 ~ 22.6 Mg C−1 ha−1年−1无相关性,表明后者更可能与植物碳输入有关。土壤有机碳侵蚀减少的幅度主要由地形坡度决定。机器学习生成的全球地图显示,减少有机碳侵蚀的相对有效性主要发生在温带地区,包括中欧、中国中东部和南美洲南部。研究结果表明,覆盖作物侵蚀减少可以增加土壤有机碳储量,提供额外的碳效益,特别是在坡地和温带农田,以减缓气候变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信