Responsive community-based dog-assisted services: an evaluation of the Bracknell community dog hub model.

Emily Shoesmith, Selina Gibsone, Hayley Ring, Lucy Purchese, Elena Ratschen
{"title":"Responsive community-based dog-assisted services: an evaluation of the Bracknell community dog hub model.","authors":"Emily Shoesmith, Selina Gibsone, Hayley Ring, Lucy Purchese, Elena Ratschen","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Animal-assisted services are increasingly common in the United Kingdom (UK) but scarcely evaluated. Dogs for Good, a UK-based charity, launched a community dog service to promote physical and mental health in underserved groups. This service evaluation explored participant experiences of this service, and how the service may 'work'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evaluation involved reviewing feedback forms and conducting semi-structured interviews with six participants who delivered or engaged with the service. A preliminary exploration of data using thematic analysis are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The service has reached 267 participants (aged 5-75+), including people with dementia (n = 173), mental health conditions (n = 40), autism spectrum condition and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (n = 31), and learning disabilities (n = 11). Feedback and interviews indicated the service positively impacted mental health and wellbeing, which may be underpinned by various mechanisms (e.g. promotion of health through companionship, enhanced motivation to engage in activities).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation highlighted the service's successful implementation and positive impact, alongside delivery barriers. Given the service's complexity, involving various content and interactions with diverse populations, it is likely multiple mechanisms work to underpin positive outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate this service at scale and explore how mechanisms may differ across diverse groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"303-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Animal-assisted services are increasingly common in the United Kingdom (UK) but scarcely evaluated. Dogs for Good, a UK-based charity, launched a community dog service to promote physical and mental health in underserved groups. This service evaluation explored participant experiences of this service, and how the service may 'work'.

Methods: The evaluation involved reviewing feedback forms and conducting semi-structured interviews with six participants who delivered or engaged with the service. A preliminary exploration of data using thematic analysis are presented.

Results: The service has reached 267 participants (aged 5-75+), including people with dementia (n = 173), mental health conditions (n = 40), autism spectrum condition and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (n = 31), and learning disabilities (n = 11). Feedback and interviews indicated the service positively impacted mental health and wellbeing, which may be underpinned by various mechanisms (e.g. promotion of health through companionship, enhanced motivation to engage in activities).

Conclusion: This evaluation highlighted the service's successful implementation and positive impact, alongside delivery barriers. Given the service's complexity, involving various content and interactions with diverse populations, it is likely multiple mechanisms work to underpin positive outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate this service at scale and explore how mechanisms may differ across diverse groups.

响应性社区犬辅助服务:对布拉克内尔社区犬中心模式的评价。
背景:动物辅助服务在英国越来越普遍,但很少进行评估。英国慈善机构Dogs for Good推出了一项社区狗服务,以促进服务不足群体的身心健康。该服务评估探讨了参与者对该服务的体验,以及该服务如何“工作”。方法:评估包括审查反馈表格,并对6名提供或参与服务的参与者进行半结构化访谈。提出了利用专题分析对数据进行初步探索。结果:该服务已覆盖267名参与者(5-75岁以上),包括患有痴呆症(n = 173)、精神健康状况(n = 40)、自闭症谱系状况和/或注意缺陷多动障碍(n = 31)和学习障碍(n = 11)的人。反馈和访谈表明,这项服务对心理健康和福祉产生了积极影响,这可能得到各种机制的支持(例如,通过陪伴促进健康、增强参与活动的动机)。结论:该评估突出了该服务的成功实施和积极影响,以及交付障碍。考虑到服务的复杂性,涉及各种内容和与不同人群的交互,很可能需要多种机制来支撑积极的结果。需要进一步的研究来大规模评估这种服务,并探索不同群体之间的机制可能有何不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信