Crash incompatibility between cars, SUVs, and pickups in 2017-2022.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Samuel S Monfort
{"title":"Crash incompatibility between cars, SUVs, and pickups in 2017-2022.","authors":"Samuel S Monfort","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2446980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The current study was conducted to update estimates of crash incompatibility between cars and SUVs/pickups in the United States. The tradeoff between case driver protection and crash partner risk associated with increasing vehicle curb weight was also quantified.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Crashes between two 1- to 4-year-old vehicles where at least one driver was killed were extracted from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) for two intervals, 2011-2016 and 2017-2022. The fatality rate for drivers and car crash partners by vehicle type and curb weight was calculated across these intervals to characterize changing self-protection and aggressivity over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Crash incompatibility between cars and SUVs/pickups improved between 2011-2016 and 2017-2022. Pickup trucks, which had previously killed the drivers of car crash partners at 2.5 times the rate of cars, were just 1.9 times more likely in 2017-2022. Similarly, SUVs over 5,000 lb reduced their car partner death rate from 1.9 times the rate of cars to just 1.2 times. We also found that additional curb weight conferred the greatest protective benefit to lighter vehicles while not accruing much additional risk to crash partners. The reverse was true for heavier vehicles, for which additional weight provided negligible extra protection but a substantial increase in crash partner risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Crash incompatibility in the fleet has continued to improve in recent years, particularly among the heaviest pickups and SUVs. Although curb weight remains an important factor in driver protection, our data suggest that the benefit plateaus at 4,000 lb, with minimal incremental gains above this point. These findings suggest that vehicle design changes have contributed to safer outcomes and that mass reduction among the heaviest vehicles may further improve crash outcomes in the future without reducing the protectiveness of those vehicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2446980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The current study was conducted to update estimates of crash incompatibility between cars and SUVs/pickups in the United States. The tradeoff between case driver protection and crash partner risk associated with increasing vehicle curb weight was also quantified.

Method: Crashes between two 1- to 4-year-old vehicles where at least one driver was killed were extracted from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) for two intervals, 2011-2016 and 2017-2022. The fatality rate for drivers and car crash partners by vehicle type and curb weight was calculated across these intervals to characterize changing self-protection and aggressivity over time.

Results: Crash incompatibility between cars and SUVs/pickups improved between 2011-2016 and 2017-2022. Pickup trucks, which had previously killed the drivers of car crash partners at 2.5 times the rate of cars, were just 1.9 times more likely in 2017-2022. Similarly, SUVs over 5,000 lb reduced their car partner death rate from 1.9 times the rate of cars to just 1.2 times. We also found that additional curb weight conferred the greatest protective benefit to lighter vehicles while not accruing much additional risk to crash partners. The reverse was true for heavier vehicles, for which additional weight provided negligible extra protection but a substantial increase in crash partner risk.

Conclusions: Crash incompatibility in the fleet has continued to improve in recent years, particularly among the heaviest pickups and SUVs. Although curb weight remains an important factor in driver protection, our data suggest that the benefit plateaus at 4,000 lb, with minimal incremental gains above this point. These findings suggest that vehicle design changes have contributed to safer outcomes and that mass reduction among the heaviest vehicles may further improve crash outcomes in the future without reducing the protectiveness of those vehicles.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信