A Randomized Trial of Automated Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-08 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2415948
Yogish C Kudva, Dan Raghinaru, John W Lum, Timothy E Graham, David Liljenquist, Elias K Spanakis, Francisco J Pasquel, Andrew Ahmann, David T Ahn, Grazia Aleppo, Thomas Blevins, Davida Kruger, Sue A Brown, Carol J Levy, Ruth S Weinstock, Devin W Steenkamp, Tamara Spaic, Irl B Hirsch, Frances Broyles, Michael R Rickels, Michael A Tsoukas, Philip Raskin, Betul Hatipoglu, Donna Desjardins, Adrienne N Terry, Lakshmi G Singh, Georgia M Davis, Caleb Schmid, Jelena Kravarusic, Kasey Coyne, Luis Casaubon, Valerie Espinosa, Jaye K Jones, Kathleen Estrada, Samina Afreen, Camilla Levister, Grenye O'Malley, Selina L Liu, Sheryl Marks, Amy J Peleckis, Melissa-Rosina Pasqua, Vanessa Tardio, Corey Kurek, Ryan D Luker, Jade Churchill, Farbod Z Tajrishi, Ariel Dean, Brittany Dennis, Evelyn Fronczyk, Jennifer Perez, Shereen Mukhashen, Jasmeen Dhillon, Aslihan Ipek, Suzan Bzdick, Astrid Atakov Castillo, Marsha Driscoll, Xenia Averkiou, Cornelia V Dalton-Bakes, Adelyn Moore, Lin F Jordan, Amanda Lesniak, Jordan E Pinsker, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Tiffany Campos, Charles Spanbauer, Lauren Kanapka, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck
{"title":"A Randomized Trial of Automated Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Yogish C Kudva, Dan Raghinaru, John W Lum, Timothy E Graham, David Liljenquist, Elias K Spanakis, Francisco J Pasquel, Andrew Ahmann, David T Ahn, Grazia Aleppo, Thomas Blevins, Davida Kruger, Sue A Brown, Carol J Levy, Ruth S Weinstock, Devin W Steenkamp, Tamara Spaic, Irl B Hirsch, Frances Broyles, Michael R Rickels, Michael A Tsoukas, Philip Raskin, Betul Hatipoglu, Donna Desjardins, Adrienne N Terry, Lakshmi G Singh, Georgia M Davis, Caleb Schmid, Jelena Kravarusic, Kasey Coyne, Luis Casaubon, Valerie Espinosa, Jaye K Jones, Kathleen Estrada, Samina Afreen, Camilla Levister, Grenye O'Malley, Selina L Liu, Sheryl Marks, Amy J Peleckis, Melissa-Rosina Pasqua, Vanessa Tardio, Corey Kurek, Ryan D Luker, Jade Churchill, Farbod Z Tajrishi, Ariel Dean, Brittany Dennis, Evelyn Fronczyk, Jennifer Perez, Shereen Mukhashen, Jasmeen Dhillon, Aslihan Ipek, Suzan Bzdick, Astrid Atakov Castillo, Marsha Driscoll, Xenia Averkiou, Cornelia V Dalton-Bakes, Adelyn Moore, Lin F Jordan, Amanda Lesniak, Jordan E Pinsker, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Tiffany Campos, Charles Spanbauer, Lauren Kanapka, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2415948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have been shown to be beneficial for patients with type 1 diabetes, but data are needed from randomized, controlled trials regarding their role in the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 13-week, multicenter trial, adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive AID or to continue their pretrial insulin-delivery method (control group); both groups received continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The primary outcome was the glycated hemoglobin level at 13 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 319 patients underwent randomization. Glycated hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.9 percentage points (from 8.2±1.4% at baseline to 7.3±0.9% at week 13) in the AID group and by 0.3 percentage points (from 8.1±1.2% to 7.7±1.1%) in the control group (mean adjusted difference, -0.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to -0.4; P<0.001). The mean percentage of time that patients were in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter increased from 48±24% to 64±16% in the AID group and from 51±21% to 52±21% in the control group (mean difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17; P<0.001). All other multiplicity-controlled CGM outcomes reflective of hyperglycemia that were measured were significantly better in the AID group than in the control group. The frequency of CGM-measured hypoglycemia was low in both groups. A severe hypoglycemia event occurred in one patient in the AID group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this 13-week, randomized, controlled trial involving adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, AID was associated with a greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin levels than CGM alone. (Funded by Tandem Diabetes Care; 2IQP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05785832.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1801-1812"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2415948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have been shown to be beneficial for patients with type 1 diabetes, but data are needed from randomized, controlled trials regarding their role in the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In this 13-week, multicenter trial, adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive AID or to continue their pretrial insulin-delivery method (control group); both groups received continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The primary outcome was the glycated hemoglobin level at 13 weeks.

Results: A total of 319 patients underwent randomization. Glycated hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.9 percentage points (from 8.2±1.4% at baseline to 7.3±0.9% at week 13) in the AID group and by 0.3 percentage points (from 8.1±1.2% to 7.7±1.1%) in the control group (mean adjusted difference, -0.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to -0.4; P<0.001). The mean percentage of time that patients were in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter increased from 48±24% to 64±16% in the AID group and from 51±21% to 52±21% in the control group (mean difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17; P<0.001). All other multiplicity-controlled CGM outcomes reflective of hyperglycemia that were measured were significantly better in the AID group than in the control group. The frequency of CGM-measured hypoglycemia was low in both groups. A severe hypoglycemia event occurred in one patient in the AID group.

Conclusions: In this 13-week, randomized, controlled trial involving adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, AID was associated with a greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin levels than CGM alone. (Funded by Tandem Diabetes Care; 2IQP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05785832.).

2型糖尿病患者自动胰岛素输送的随机试验
背景:自动化胰岛素输送(AID)系统已被证明对1型糖尿病患者有益,但关于其在胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病管理中的作用,还需要随机对照试验的数据。方法:在这项为期13周的多中心试验中,胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病成人患者以2:1的比例随机分配接受AID或继续其试验前胰岛素递送方法(对照组);两组均接受连续血糖监测(CGM)。主要终点是13周时的糖化血红蛋白水平。结果:共有319例患者接受了随机分组。AID组糖化血红蛋白水平下降了0.9个百分点(从基线时的8.2±1.4%降至第13周时的7.3±0.9%),对照组下降了0.3个百分点(从8.1±1.2%降至7.7±1.1%)(调整后的平均差异为-0.6个百分点;95%置信区间[CI], -0.8 ~ -0.4;结论:在这项为期13周的随机对照试验中,针对胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病成人患者,AID与单独使用CGM相比,糖化血红蛋白水平的降低幅度更大。(由Tandem Diabetes Care资助;2IQP ClinicalTrials.gov号码:NCT05785832)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信