Angela Claudia Paixão Soares de Magalhães, Gutenberg do Amaral Gurgel, Svetlana Maria Wanderley de Barros, Miguel Lucas Silva Valente, Maurício de Amorim Aquino, Sthefanie da Silva Bessa, Rogério Ferraz Baquette, Aldemar Araújo Castro, Guilherme Benjamim Brandão Pitta
{"title":"Gastrointestinal histological injury in pigs subjected to triple stent interposition in the thoracoabdominal aorta.","authors":"Angela Claudia Paixão Soares de Magalhães, Gutenberg do Amaral Gurgel, Svetlana Maria Wanderley de Barros, Miguel Lucas Silva Valente, Maurício de Amorim Aquino, Sthefanie da Silva Bessa, Rogério Ferraz Baquette, Aldemar Araújo Castro, Guilherme Benjamim Brandão Pitta","doi":"10.1590/acb402425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate gastrointestinal histological injury in pigs subjected to triple stent interposition versus a control group, hypothesizing no significant injury increase with triple stents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study with 15 pigs divided into a control group (G0, n = 5) undergoing arteriography only, and a triple stent group (G3, n = 10) undergoing arteriography and three stent implantations in the thoracoabdominal aorta. After an eight-day observation, arteriography, euthanasia, and en bloc gastrointestinal harvesting were performed. Lesions were graded using the Park/Chiu classification, and serum markers were analyzed pre- and post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Arteriography confirmed mesenteric artery patency in all animals. Histological analysis showed ischemic lesions in 88.9% of G3, mainly in the colon (89%), compared to 60% in G0, primarily in the colon (60%) and stomach (40%). Most G3 lesions were grade 1, while G0 had higher-grade lesions. Serum markers showed no significant intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Triple stent interposition did not significantly increase gastrointestinal injury, indicating its safety for maintaining gastrointestinal perfusion in this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"40 ","pages":"e402425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb402425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate gastrointestinal histological injury in pigs subjected to triple stent interposition versus a control group, hypothesizing no significant injury increase with triple stents.
Methods: A prospective study with 15 pigs divided into a control group (G0, n = 5) undergoing arteriography only, and a triple stent group (G3, n = 10) undergoing arteriography and three stent implantations in the thoracoabdominal aorta. After an eight-day observation, arteriography, euthanasia, and en bloc gastrointestinal harvesting were performed. Lesions were graded using the Park/Chiu classification, and serum markers were analyzed pre- and post-procedure.
Results: Arteriography confirmed mesenteric artery patency in all animals. Histological analysis showed ischemic lesions in 88.9% of G3, mainly in the colon (89%), compared to 60% in G0, primarily in the colon (60%) and stomach (40%). Most G3 lesions were grade 1, while G0 had higher-grade lesions. Serum markers showed no significant intergroup differences.
Conclusion: Triple stent interposition did not significantly increase gastrointestinal injury, indicating its safety for maintaining gastrointestinal perfusion in this model.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
