Efficacy and Hypoglycemia Profile of Once-weekly Insulin Icodec vs Once-daily Comparators Across Demographic Subgroups.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ildiko Lingvay, Julie Krogsdahl Bache, Cyrus V Desouza, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Andrea Navarria, Shehla S Shaikh, André G D Vianna
{"title":"Efficacy and Hypoglycemia Profile of Once-weekly Insulin Icodec vs Once-daily Comparators Across Demographic Subgroups.","authors":"Ildiko Lingvay, Julie Krogsdahl Bache, Cyrus V Desouza, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Andrea Navarria, Shehla S Shaikh, André G D Vianna","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This post hoc analysis evaluated the impact of age, ethnicity, and race on efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) vs once-daily (OD) basal insulin comparators, leveraging data from the ONWARDS 1 to 5 phase 3a clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes were assessed within each trial in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3, and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes across subgroups of age (<55, 55-64, and ≥65 years), ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino), and race (Asian, Black/African American, White, Other). The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to planned end of treatment. Other outcomes assessed included the achievement of HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia and the number of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemic episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all trials, the estimated treatment differences for change in HbA1c and the odds ratios for achieving HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were similar across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups with icodec vs OD insulin (no statistically significant treatment by subgroup interactions were observed; P > .05 in all instances). Hypoglycemia rates were numerically low for both treatment groups and consistent across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy and hypoglycemia profile of icodec vs OD comparators was consistent across trial populations irrespective of age, ethnicity, or race.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e3596-e3606"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This post hoc analysis evaluated the impact of age, ethnicity, and race on efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) vs once-daily (OD) basal insulin comparators, leveraging data from the ONWARDS 1 to 5 phase 3a clinical trials.

Methods: Efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes were assessed within each trial in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3, and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes across subgroups of age (<55, 55-64, and ≥65 years), ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino), and race (Asian, Black/African American, White, Other). The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to planned end of treatment. Other outcomes assessed included the achievement of HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia and the number of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemic episodes.

Results: Across all trials, the estimated treatment differences for change in HbA1c and the odds ratios for achieving HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were similar across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups with icodec vs OD insulin (no statistically significant treatment by subgroup interactions were observed; P > .05 in all instances). Hypoglycemia rates were numerically low for both treatment groups and consistent across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups.

Conclusion: The efficacy and hypoglycemia profile of icodec vs OD comparators was consistent across trial populations irrespective of age, ethnicity, or race.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在人口统计学亚组中,每周一次胰岛素Icodec与每天一次比较者的疗效和低血糖状况。
目的:本事后分析评估了年龄、种族和种族对每周一次胰岛素icodec (icodec)与每日一次(OD)基础胰岛素比较物的疗效和低血糖结局的影响,利用了来自1-5期3a临床试验的数据。方法:在每项试验中,对胰岛素初始(1、3和5)和胰岛素经验(2和4)成人(≥18岁)2型糖尿病患者的疗效和低血糖结局进行评估,并跨越年龄亚组(结果:在所有试验中,HbA1c变化的估计治疗差异以及在所有情况下实现HbA1c 0.05的优势比)。两个治疗组的低血糖率在数值上都很低,并且在年龄、种族和种族亚组中是一致的。结论:icodec与OD比较物的疗效和低血糖状况在不同年龄、种族或种族的试验人群中是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信