Preliminary study: Low to moderate PEEP effects on ICP in acute neurological injury patients under mechanical ventilation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Technology and Health Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1177/09287329241291322
Nan Xiu
{"title":"Preliminary study: Low to moderate PEEP effects on ICP in acute neurological injury patients under mechanical ventilation.","authors":"Nan Xiu","doi":"10.1177/09287329241291322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) significantly impacts mortality and prognosis in acute neurological injury patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is essential in mechanical ventilation to enhance oxygenation, yet its application may elevate intracranial pressure (ICP). Studies show conflicting findings regarding PEEP's effect on ICP, particularly at low to moderate levels (5-10cmH2O), warranting further investigation in acute neurological injury cases.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of low to moderate PEEP on ICP in patients with acute neurological injury who require mechanical ventilation.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 62 patients with acute neurological injury requiring mechanical ventilation at our hospital between January 2021 and September 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into high PEEP (> 10cmH2O) and low to moderate PEEP (5-10cmH2O) groups. Parameters including PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2, driving pressure, compliance (Cst), airway resistance, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac index (CI), ICP, and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were recorded pre- and post-ventilation initiation, with correlation analysis performed between ICP and other parameters.ResultsPre-treatment comparisons between the high PEEP and low to moderate PEEP groups revealed no significant differences in PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2, driving pressure, Cs, and airway resistance. However, post-treatment analysis showed significant disparities, with the high PEEP group exhibiting higher PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 levels and lower PaCO2, driving pressure, and airway resistance levels compared to the low to moderate PEEP group. Additionally, hemodynamic parameters such as HR, SBP, DBP, CI, MAP, CVP, ICP, and CPP remained more stable in the low to moderate PEEP group post-treatment, with ICP demonstrating significant correlations with various physiological parameters.ConclusionHigh PEEP improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in acute neurological injury patients on mechanical ventilation but may affect hemodynamic parameters, ICP, and CPP. Conversely, low to moderate PEEP has minimal impact on these factors. Hence, personalized adjustment of PEEP levels is essential in clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"981-988"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241291322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) significantly impacts mortality and prognosis in acute neurological injury patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is essential in mechanical ventilation to enhance oxygenation, yet its application may elevate intracranial pressure (ICP). Studies show conflicting findings regarding PEEP's effect on ICP, particularly at low to moderate levels (5-10cmH2O), warranting further investigation in acute neurological injury cases.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of low to moderate PEEP on ICP in patients with acute neurological injury who require mechanical ventilation.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 62 patients with acute neurological injury requiring mechanical ventilation at our hospital between January 2021 and September 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into high PEEP (> 10cmH2O) and low to moderate PEEP (5-10cmH2O) groups. Parameters including PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2, driving pressure, compliance (Cst), airway resistance, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac index (CI), ICP, and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were recorded pre- and post-ventilation initiation, with correlation analysis performed between ICP and other parameters.ResultsPre-treatment comparisons between the high PEEP and low to moderate PEEP groups revealed no significant differences in PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2, driving pressure, Cs, and airway resistance. However, post-treatment analysis showed significant disparities, with the high PEEP group exhibiting higher PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 levels and lower PaCO2, driving pressure, and airway resistance levels compared to the low to moderate PEEP group. Additionally, hemodynamic parameters such as HR, SBP, DBP, CI, MAP, CVP, ICP, and CPP remained more stable in the low to moderate PEEP group post-treatment, with ICP demonstrating significant correlations with various physiological parameters.ConclusionHigh PEEP improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in acute neurological injury patients on mechanical ventilation but may affect hemodynamic parameters, ICP, and CPP. Conversely, low to moderate PEEP has minimal impact on these factors. Hence, personalized adjustment of PEEP levels is essential in clinical management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信