Thermal temporal summation has good reliability in the lumbar region.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Max Jordon, Matthew Grubb, Jessica Hackathorne
{"title":"Thermal temporal summation has good reliability in the lumbar region.","authors":"Max Jordon, Matthew Grubb, Jessica Hackathorne","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2481315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Temporal summation (TS) via a thermal stimulus is a form of dynamic quantitative sensory testing that is often used as an indirect measure of central sensitization. While TS is frequently used as an outcome measure to assess the effectiveness of various interventions, the reliability of this measure has yet to be fully assessed in the lumbar spine. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of TS using a thermal stimulus at the lumbar spine (LS). The secondary purpose was to compare the thermal TS values in the LS to that of the tibialis anterior (TA) and the thenar eminence (TE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with no activity limiting pain conditions between the ages of 18 and 40 were recruited to participate in this study. TS was measured following a series of heat-pulses administered by the Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer-II system. After undergoing an optimization session, TS was taken at the LS, the muscle belly of the TA, and the TE, all on the right side. A second thermal TS measurement was taken once again a week later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 (<i>n</i> = 11 female) individuals participated in this study. ICC values in the lumbar spine ranged from moderate to good (0.591 to 0.836) depending on the calculation method. This compared to the TA with ICC values ranging from 0.621 to 0.772 and the TE with values ranging from 0.572 to 0.751. Correlations of the thermal TS values were high between the LS and the TA (<i>r</i> = 0.745), moderate between the TA and the TE (<i>r</i> = 0.631), and weak between the LS and the TE (<i>r</i> = 0.443).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Thermal TS taken at the LS is a reliable measure with ICC values that are comparable to ICC values found at the TA and the TE.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2481315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Temporal summation (TS) via a thermal stimulus is a form of dynamic quantitative sensory testing that is often used as an indirect measure of central sensitization. While TS is frequently used as an outcome measure to assess the effectiveness of various interventions, the reliability of this measure has yet to be fully assessed in the lumbar spine. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of TS using a thermal stimulus at the lumbar spine (LS). The secondary purpose was to compare the thermal TS values in the LS to that of the tibialis anterior (TA) and the thenar eminence (TE).

Methods: Adults with no activity limiting pain conditions between the ages of 18 and 40 were recruited to participate in this study. TS was measured following a series of heat-pulses administered by the Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer-II system. After undergoing an optimization session, TS was taken at the LS, the muscle belly of the TA, and the TE, all on the right side. A second thermal TS measurement was taken once again a week later.

Results: A total of 25 (n = 11 female) individuals participated in this study. ICC values in the lumbar spine ranged from moderate to good (0.591 to 0.836) depending on the calculation method. This compared to the TA with ICC values ranging from 0.621 to 0.772 and the TE with values ranging from 0.572 to 0.751. Correlations of the thermal TS values were high between the LS and the TA (r = 0.745), moderate between the TA and the TE (r = 0.631), and weak between the LS and the TE (r = 0.443).

Discussion/conclusion: Thermal TS taken at the LS is a reliable measure with ICC values that are comparable to ICC values found at the TA and the TE.

目的:通过热刺激进行的时间总和(TS)是一种动态定量感觉测试,经常被用作中枢敏化的间接测量方法。虽然 TS 经常被用作评估各种干预措施有效性的结果测量指标,但该指标在腰椎中的可靠性仍有待全面评估。因此,本研究的主要目的是利用腰椎(LS)的热刺激来确定 TS 的测试-重复可靠性。次要目的是将腰椎的热TS值与胫骨前肌(TA)和肩胛骨突(TE)的热TS值进行比较:方法:招募年龄在 18 岁至 40 岁之间、无活动限制性疼痛症状的成年人参与本研究。在使用 Medoc 热感觉分析仪-II 系统实施一系列热脉冲后,对胫骨后凸进行测量。在进行优化训练后,在右侧的 LS、TA 的肌腹和 TE 处测量 TS。一周后再次进行热TS测量:共有 25 人(女性 11 人)参与了这项研究。根据不同的计算方法,腰椎的 ICC 值从中等到良好(0.591 到 0.836)不等。相比之下,TA 的 ICC 值介于 0.621 到 0.772 之间,TE 的 ICC 值介于 0.572 到 0.751 之间。LS 和 TA 之间的热 TS 值相关性较高(r = 0.745),TA 和 TE 之间的相关性中等(r = 0.631),LS 和 TE 之间的相关性较低(r = 0.443):讨论/结论:在LS测量热TS是一种可靠的测量方法,其ICC值与在TA和TE测量的ICC值相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信