The nutritional impact of 7 versus 21 home-delivered medically tailored meals in patients with heart failure and malnutrition risk: a random order crossover feeding trial (MEDIMEALS).

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Charlene Compher, Jule Anne Henstenburg, Marianne Aloupis, Amy Sun, Ryan Quinn, Elizabeth Emery, Jovina Thomas, Adrian Glass Crafford, Daniel R Schwartz
{"title":"The nutritional impact of 7 versus 21 home-delivered medically tailored meals in patients with heart failure and malnutrition risk: a random order crossover feeding trial (MEDIMEALS).","authors":"Charlene Compher, Jule Anne Henstenburg, Marianne Aloupis, Amy Sun, Ryan Quinn, Elizabeth Emery, Jovina Thomas, Adrian Glass Crafford, Daniel R Schwartz","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01036-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is frequently associated with malnutrition or malnutrition risk. The delivery of medically tailored meals (MTM) to the homes of patients with HF and malnutrition risk or malnutrition after hospital discharge holds promise for improving outcomes. However, the number of MTM needed to provide benefit is not established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random order crossover study was designed to compare the delivery of 7 versus 21 MTM for four weeks each to patients discharged from the hospital with HF and malnutrition risk. Telephone surveys were conducted at baseline, 30, and 60 days post-discharge to evaluate change in malnutrition risk, American Heart Association (AHA) diet goals, sarcopenia risk, and 30-day readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six patients were enrolled. Patients had reduced odds of having malnutrition risk relative to the baseline score at one and two months (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.74 and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.99, respectively). The AHA diet score improved over time from baseline by 0.73 ± 0.22 units at one month (p = 0.0014), and by 0.48 ± 0.23 units at two months (p = 0.0430), regardless of the number of MTM provided. Sarcopenia risk improved over time (p = 0.01), decreasing by 0.43 ± 0.2 units by one (p = 0.03) and 0.59 ± 0.21 units by two months (p = 0.007) regardless of the number of MTM provided. Readmissions by 30 days were not significantly different based on the number of MTM provided (9% for 21 MTM vs 12.5% for 7 MTM), but well below national data at 23%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The provision of at least seven MTM per week in the early window after hospital discharge to patients with HF and malnutrition or malnutrition risk is a promising strategy to improve malnutrition and sarcopenia risk and diet adherence, while keeping readmissions below national averages.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06142903, registered 11/23/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01036-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is frequently associated with malnutrition or malnutrition risk. The delivery of medically tailored meals (MTM) to the homes of patients with HF and malnutrition risk or malnutrition after hospital discharge holds promise for improving outcomes. However, the number of MTM needed to provide benefit is not established.

Methods: A random order crossover study was designed to compare the delivery of 7 versus 21 MTM for four weeks each to patients discharged from the hospital with HF and malnutrition risk. Telephone surveys were conducted at baseline, 30, and 60 days post-discharge to evaluate change in malnutrition risk, American Heart Association (AHA) diet goals, sarcopenia risk, and 30-day readmissions.

Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled. Patients had reduced odds of having malnutrition risk relative to the baseline score at one and two months (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.74 and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.99, respectively). The AHA diet score improved over time from baseline by 0.73 ± 0.22 units at one month (p = 0.0014), and by 0.48 ± 0.23 units at two months (p = 0.0430), regardless of the number of MTM provided. Sarcopenia risk improved over time (p = 0.01), decreasing by 0.43 ± 0.2 units by one (p = 0.03) and 0.59 ± 0.21 units by two months (p = 0.007) regardless of the number of MTM provided. Readmissions by 30 days were not significantly different based on the number of MTM provided (9% for 21 MTM vs 12.5% for 7 MTM), but well below national data at 23%.

Conclusion: The provision of at least seven MTM per week in the early window after hospital discharge to patients with HF and malnutrition or malnutrition risk is a promising strategy to improve malnutrition and sarcopenia risk and diet adherence, while keeping readmissions below national averages.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06142903, registered 11/23/2023.

对有心力衰竭和营养不良风险的患者,7餐和21餐的家庭医疗定制餐的营养影响:随机顺序交叉喂养试验(MEDIMEALS)。
背景:心力衰竭(HF)经常与营养不良或营养不良风险相关。向心衰和有营养不良风险或出院后营养不良的患者家中提供医学定制膳食(MTM)有望改善结果。然而,提供效益所需的MTM数量尚未确定。方法:设计一项随机顺序交叉研究,比较有HF和营养不良风险的出院患者在4周内使用7个MTM和21个MTM的情况。在出院后基线、30天和60天进行电话调查,以评估营养不良风险、美国心脏协会(AHA)饮食目标、肌肉减少症风险和30天再入院的变化。结果:纳入46例患者。与基线评分相比,患者在1个月和2个月时出现营养不良风险的几率降低(OR分别为0.18,95% CI 0.04-0.74和OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.99)。无论提供MTM的次数如何,AHA饮食评分在一个月时较基线提高了0.73±0.22个单位(p = 0.0014),在两个月时提高了0.48±0.23个单位(p = 0.0430)。骨骼肌减少症的风险随时间的推移而改善(p = 0.01),无论提供MTM的次数如何,每个月减少0.43±0.2个单位(p = 0.03),两个月减少0.59±0.21个单位(p = 0.007)。根据提供的MTM数量,30天内的再入院率没有显着差异(21 MTM为9%,7 MTM为12.5%),但远低于23%的国家数据。结论:对于有营养不良或营养不良风险的HF患者,在出院后的早期窗口每周提供至少7次MTM是一种有希望的策略,可以改善营养不良和肌肉减少症的风险和饮食依从性,同时使再入院率低于全国平均水平。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06142903, 20123年11月23日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信