Are Rape Myths Inherently Gendered? Examining Assumed Gender Ascribed to Gender-Neutral Versions of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale Among College Students.

IF 2.3 3区社会学 Q1 WOMENS STUDIES

Violence Against Women Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1177/10778012251329222

Olivia M Kleinsmith, Olivia N Hahn, Dayna Henry, Laura Merrell, Sarah Blackstone, Abigayle Y Tomchik, Julia Sell, Meredith Gramstad, Jordan E Schuetz, Callie M Doyle, Brittany M Haney

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rape myths are false beliefs about sexual violence that shift blame to the victim rather than the perpetrator. The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRMA) scale measures these myths, but critiques have led to the creation of gender-neutral versions. This study aimed to investigate how participants perceive gender in these versions. Surveys were given to U.S. college students, with variations in victim and perpetrator gender. Results showed no significant differences in IRMA scores based on gender-neutral versions. However, most participants still associated a female victim and a male perpetrator with sexual assault, indicating the persistent gendered nature of rape myths.

查看原文本刊更多论文

强奸神话天生就性别化吗？检视中性版本的伊利诺斯州大学生强奸神话接受度量表所假定的性别。

强奸迷思是关于性暴力的错误信念，它把责任推给受害者，而不是肇事者。伊利诺斯州强奸神话接受度（IRMA）量表衡量了这些神话，但批评导致了中性版本的产生。这项研究旨在调查参与者如何在这些版本中感知性别。调查对象是美国大学生，受害者和加害者的性别各不相同。结果显示，基于性别中立版本的IRMA评分没有显著差异。然而，大多数参与者仍然将一名女性受害者和一名男性犯罪者与性侵犯联系在一起，这表明强奸神话的性别本质一直存在。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Violence Against Women WOMENS STUDIES-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

4.50%

发文量

142

期刊介绍： Violence against Women is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of research and information on all aspects of the problem of violence against women. The journal assumes a broad definition of violence; topics to be covered include, but are not limited to, domestic violence, sexual assault, incest, sexual harassment, female infantcide, female circumcision, and female sexual slavery.