Brendon Fusco, Jasmine Tomita-Barber, Natale Mazzaferro, Anne Tyno, Nicole McEntee, Patricia Greenberg, Roger Strair, Dale Schaar, Dennis Cooper
{"title":"Prophylactic Vancomycin in the Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant.","authors":"Brendon Fusco, Jasmine Tomita-Barber, Natale Mazzaferro, Anne Tyno, Nicole McEntee, Patricia Greenberg, Roger Strair, Dale Schaar, Dennis Cooper","doi":"10.1111/tid.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection is a frequent complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplant, contributing to increased morbidity in this population. Despite current infection prevention strategies, rates among posttransplant patients at some centers remain high. Oral vancomycin is a safe and well-tolerated antibiotic that may be a potential adjunct to prevent C. difficile.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of oral vancomycin in preventing C. difficile among allogeneic stem cell transplant patients and assess other posttransplant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing the rate of C. difficile following allogeneic transplant in patients who received oral vancomycin versus no prophylaxis during hospitalization. The primary outcome was the development of C. difficile infection within the first 100 days following transplant, defined as a positive stool toxin assay or PCR. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, hospital-acquired infections, overall mortality, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and rehospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 202 patients, one case of C. difficile occurred in the prophylaxis group (1/71, 1.4%) compared to 31 cases in the unexposed group (31/131, 23.6%). Patients who received prophylaxis were significantly less likely to develop C. difficile infection during the study period (OR 0.046, p = 0.003). No differences were observed between groups in hospital-acquired infections, mortality, incidence of acute GVHD, and rehospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic vancomycin was associated with a marked reduction in C. difficile infection in allogeneic transplant patients. Despite no significant impact on other clinical outcomes, there was a significant reduction in symptomatic C. difficile infection. Further prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection is a frequent complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplant, contributing to increased morbidity in this population. Despite current infection prevention strategies, rates among posttransplant patients at some centers remain high. Oral vancomycin is a safe and well-tolerated antibiotic that may be a potential adjunct to prevent C. difficile.
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of oral vancomycin in preventing C. difficile among allogeneic stem cell transplant patients and assess other posttransplant outcomes.
Study design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing the rate of C. difficile following allogeneic transplant in patients who received oral vancomycin versus no prophylaxis during hospitalization. The primary outcome was the development of C. difficile infection within the first 100 days following transplant, defined as a positive stool toxin assay or PCR. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, hospital-acquired infections, overall mortality, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and rehospitalization.
Results: Among the 202 patients, one case of C. difficile occurred in the prophylaxis group (1/71, 1.4%) compared to 31 cases in the unexposed group (31/131, 23.6%). Patients who received prophylaxis were significantly less likely to develop C. difficile infection during the study period (OR 0.046, p = 0.003). No differences were observed between groups in hospital-acquired infections, mortality, incidence of acute GVHD, and rehospitalization.
Conclusion: Prophylactic vancomycin was associated with a marked reduction in C. difficile infection in allogeneic transplant patients. Despite no significant impact on other clinical outcomes, there was a significant reduction in symptomatic C. difficile infection. Further prospective studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.