[Correlation analysis between preoperative C 2 slope and effectiveness at 2 years after short-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].

Q3 Medicine
Zhaojun Cheng, Yan Gong, Yanchi Gan, Jiahui He, De Liang, Hui Ren, Xiaobing Jiang
{"title":"[Correlation analysis between preoperative C <sub>2</sub> slope and effectiveness at 2 years after short-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].","authors":"Zhaojun Cheng, Yan Gong, Yanchi Gan, Jiahui He, De Liang, Hui Ren, Xiaobing Jiang","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202409010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate correlation between preoperative C <sub>2</sub> slope (C2S) and effectiveness at 2 years after short-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), with the aim of providing reliable indicators for predicting effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and eighteen patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, who received short-segment ACDF between January 2018 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria, were enrolled in the study. There were 46 males and 72 females, aged from 26 to 80 years, with a mean age of 53.6 years. The operative duration was (127.6±33.46) minutes and the intraoperative blood loss was (34.75±30.40) mL. All patients were followed up 2 years. The pre- and post-operative Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain were recorded. Based on the anteroposterior and lateral cervical X-ray films, the sagittal parameters of the cervical spine were measured [C <sub>2</sub>-C <sub>7</sub> Cobb angle, C <sub>0</sub>-C <sub>2</sub> Cobb angle, T <sub>1</sub> slope, C2S, sagittal segmental angle (SSA) of the surgical segment, and average surgical disc height (ASDH) of the surgical segment]. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences in these indicators between pre- and post-operation, as well as the correlations between the preoperative C2S and the JOA score, NDI, and VAS score at 2 years after operation. The patients were allocated into group A (C2S >11.73°) and group B (C2S≤ 11.73°) according to the median value of the preoperative C2S (11.73°). The JOA score, NDI, and VAS score before operation and at 2 years after operation, as well as the differences between pre- and post-operative values (change values), were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The T <sub>1</sub> slope, C <sub>2</sub>-C <sub>7</sub> Cobb angle, C <sub>0</sub>-C <sub>2</sub> Cobb angle, SSA, and ASDH at immediate after operation and JOA score, NDI, and VAS score at 2 years after operation significantly improved in 118 patients when compared with preoperative ones ( <i>P</i><0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that preoperative C2S was not correlated with JOA score and NDI at 2 years after operation ( <i>P</i>>0.05), but negatively correlated with VAS score ( <i>P</i><0.05). There were 59 patients with preoperative C2S>11.73° (group A) and 59 with C2S≤11.73° (group B). There was no significant difference in preoperative JOA score, NDI, and VAS score between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). There were significant differences in VAS score at 2 year after operation and the change value between the two groups ( <i>P</i><0.05); there was no significant difference in the JOA score and NDI ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a higher preoperative C2S exhibited superior long-term pain relief and effectiveness following short-segment ACDF.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 3","pages":"341-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202409010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate correlation between preoperative C 2 slope (C2S) and effectiveness at 2 years after short-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), with the aim of providing reliable indicators for predicting effectiveness.

Methods: One hundred and eighteen patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, who received short-segment ACDF between January 2018 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria, were enrolled in the study. There were 46 males and 72 females, aged from 26 to 80 years, with a mean age of 53.6 years. The operative duration was (127.6±33.46) minutes and the intraoperative blood loss was (34.75±30.40) mL. All patients were followed up 2 years. The pre- and post-operative Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain were recorded. Based on the anteroposterior and lateral cervical X-ray films, the sagittal parameters of the cervical spine were measured [C 2-C 7 Cobb angle, C 0-C 2 Cobb angle, T 1 slope, C2S, sagittal segmental angle (SSA) of the surgical segment, and average surgical disc height (ASDH) of the surgical segment]. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences in these indicators between pre- and post-operation, as well as the correlations between the preoperative C2S and the JOA score, NDI, and VAS score at 2 years after operation. The patients were allocated into group A (C2S >11.73°) and group B (C2S≤ 11.73°) according to the median value of the preoperative C2S (11.73°). The JOA score, NDI, and VAS score before operation and at 2 years after operation, as well as the differences between pre- and post-operative values (change values), were compared between the two groups.

Results: The T 1 slope, C 2-C 7 Cobb angle, C 0-C 2 Cobb angle, SSA, and ASDH at immediate after operation and JOA score, NDI, and VAS score at 2 years after operation significantly improved in 118 patients when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that preoperative C2S was not correlated with JOA score and NDI at 2 years after operation ( P>0.05), but negatively correlated with VAS score ( P<0.05). There were 59 patients with preoperative C2S>11.73° (group A) and 59 with C2S≤11.73° (group B). There was no significant difference in preoperative JOA score, NDI, and VAS score between the two groups ( P>0.05). There were significant differences in VAS score at 2 year after operation and the change value between the two groups ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the JOA score and NDI ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a higher preoperative C2S exhibited superior long-term pain relief and effectiveness following short-segment ACDF.

[术前c2斜率与短节段颈前路椎间盘切除术融合术后2年疗效的相关性分析]。
目的:探讨短节段颈前路椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)术后2年术前c2斜率(C2S)与疗效的相关性,为预测疗效提供可靠的指标。方法:2018年1月至2022年12月期间接受短段ACDF治疗的118例脊髓型颈椎病患者符合入选标准。男性46例,女性72例,年龄26 ~ 80岁,平均年龄53.6岁。手术时间(127.6±33.46)分钟,术中出血量(34.75±30.40)mL,随访2年。记录术前、术后颈部失能指数(NDI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)。根据颈椎正侧位x线片,测量颈椎矢状面参数[c2 - c7 Cobb角,c0 - c2 Cobb角,t1斜率,C2S,手术节段矢状节段角(SSA),手术节段平均椎间盘高度(ASDH)]。统计分析术前与术后这些指标的差异,以及术前C2S与术后2年JOA评分、NDI评分、VAS评分的相关性。根据术前C2S中位数(11.73°)分为A组(C2S≤11.73°)和B组(C2S≤11.73°)。比较两组患者术前、术后2年JOA评分、NDI、VAS评分及术前、术后差异值(变化值)。结果:T 1斜率,C 2 C 7科布角,C 0 C 2 Cobb角,SSA,和ASDH直接操作和琼得分后,NDI,手术和血管评分在2年后118年显著提高患者与术前相比(PP > 0.05),但与脉管分数负相关(P11.73°(A组)和59 in≤11.73°(B组)。术前琼得分没有显著差异,NDI,和血管评分两组之间(P > 0.05)。两组术后2年VAS评分及变化值比较,差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:术前C2S较高的脊髓型颈椎病患者在短段ACDF后表现出较好的长期疼痛缓解和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信