New index for distinguishing between critical illness myopathy and neuromyopathy: CMAP amplitude/duration index.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5949
Handan Uzunçakmak Uyanik, Fatma Gökçem Yildiz, Çağrı Mesut Temuçin
{"title":"New index for distinguishing between critical illness myopathy and neuromyopathy: CMAP amplitude/duration index.","authors":"Handan Uzunçakmak Uyanik, Fatma Gökçem Yildiz, Çağrı Mesut Temuçin","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Critical illness-associated weakness is a common neuromuscular syndrome that may manifest as critical illness myopathy (CIM), critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP), or an overlapping syndrome known as critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPM). Distinguishing between these subtypes can be challenging due to technical issues, patient-related factors such as insufficient cooperation with needle electromyography (EMG) or edema, and the need for sophisticated, time-consuming electrophysiological methods and invasive procedures such as biopsy. This study aimed to contribute to the electrophysiological distinction between CIM and CIPM.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A new index was designed based on distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude and negative peak duration values. Comparative and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed on the parameters of patients with CIM and CIPM, as well as between patient groups and controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median and ulnar CMAP index cut-off values for distinguishing between CIM and CIPM were determined to be 0.35 and 0.51, respectively. Values below these cut-off points support a diagnosis of CIPM while higher values indicate CIM. The best parameter for distinguishing both CIM and CIPM patients from healthy controls was the peroneal CMAP index, with a cut-off value of 0.45.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CMAP index can be easily calculated from CMAP values obtained during routine nerve conduction studies. This index may serve as a practical and guiding method for differentiating between CIM and CIPM, contributing to the electrophysiological diagnosis of critically ill patients, and particularly those with unreliable sensory nerve action potentials and needle EMG examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 1","pages":"112-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Critical illness-associated weakness is a common neuromuscular syndrome that may manifest as critical illness myopathy (CIM), critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP), or an overlapping syndrome known as critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPM). Distinguishing between these subtypes can be challenging due to technical issues, patient-related factors such as insufficient cooperation with needle electromyography (EMG) or edema, and the need for sophisticated, time-consuming electrophysiological methods and invasive procedures such as biopsy. This study aimed to contribute to the electrophysiological distinction between CIM and CIPM.

Materials and methods: A new index was designed based on distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude and negative peak duration values. Comparative and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed on the parameters of patients with CIM and CIPM, as well as between patient groups and controls.

Results: The median and ulnar CMAP index cut-off values for distinguishing between CIM and CIPM were determined to be 0.35 and 0.51, respectively. Values below these cut-off points support a diagnosis of CIPM while higher values indicate CIM. The best parameter for distinguishing both CIM and CIPM patients from healthy controls was the peroneal CMAP index, with a cut-off value of 0.45.

Conclusion: The CMAP index can be easily calculated from CMAP values obtained during routine nerve conduction studies. This index may serve as a practical and guiding method for differentiating between CIM and CIPM, contributing to the electrophysiological diagnosis of critically ill patients, and particularly those with unreliable sensory nerve action potentials and needle EMG examinations.

鉴别危重性肌病和神经性肌病的新指标:CMAP振幅/持续时间指数。
背景/目的:危重性疾病相关性无力是一种常见的神经肌肉综合征,可表现为危重性肌病(CIM)、危重性多神经病变(CIP)或重叠综合征,称为危重性多神经肌病(CIPM)。由于技术问题、患者相关因素(如与针肌电图(EMG)或水肿配合不足)以及需要复杂、耗时的电生理方法和侵入性手术(如活检),区分这些亚型可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨CIM与CIPM的电生理差异。材料与方法:基于远端复合肌动作电位(CMAP)振幅和负峰持续时间设计了一个新的指标。对CIM和CIPM患者以及患者组与对照组之间的参数进行对比分析和受试者工作特征曲线分析。结果:区分CIM和CIPM的中位和尺侧CMAP指数临界值分别为0.35和0.51。低于这些分界点的值支持CIPM的诊断,而较高的值表明CIM。区分CIM和CIPM患者与健康对照的最佳参数是腓骨CMAP指数,临界值为0.45。结论:从常规神经传导检查中获得的CMAP值可以很容易地计算出CMAP指数。该指标可作为区分CIM和CIPM的实用和指标性方法,有助于危重患者,特别是感觉神经动作电位和针肌电图检查不可靠的危重患者的电生理诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信