Utility of a patient similarity-based digital tool for risk communication to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: perspectives from primary care physicians in ambulatory care.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319992
Ruiheng Ong, Chirk Jenn Ng, Kalaipriya Gunasekaran, Hang Liu, Wynne Hsu, Mong Li Lee, Ngiap Chuan Tan
{"title":"Utility of a patient similarity-based digital tool for risk communication to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: perspectives from primary care physicians in ambulatory care.","authors":"Ruiheng Ong, Chirk Jenn Ng, Kalaipriya Gunasekaran, Hang Liu, Wynne Hsu, Mong Li Lee, Ngiap Chuan Tan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0319992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inaccurate risk perceptions of diabetes complications are responsible for the inertia among patients to engage in protective health behaviours. One potential approach to changing risk perceptions is to use social comparison of their diabetes to other people of similar clinicodemographic profiles.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the perspectives of primary care physicians (PCPs) in ambulatory care on the utility of a patient similarity-based digital tool for risk communication to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study design using direct observation and in-depth interviews was conducted on 11 PCP participants. Participants had at least 6 months of clinical experience in ambulatory primary care. Participants went through three hypothetical case scenarios using the digital tool under direct observation and shared their perspectives on its utility during an in-depth interview. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCPs perceived the digital tool to be useful in educating patients with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled T2DM and to motivate them to achieve better glycated haemoglobin (HBA1c) levels. Patients who do not practise social comparison would refrain from HBA1c comparison and prefer to know the absolute state of their diabetes. PCPs were also concerned about patients' potential for false reassurance or negative reactions instead of correctly understanding the risk message intended for them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patient similarity-based digital tool requires further work to support PCPs in risk communication to patients with T2DM. Usage should be targeted at patient subgroups with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled T2DM and who practise social comparison. Strategies to maximise benefit include identifying patients who practise social comparison and training PCPs to be adept at framing and communicating risk information in a person-centric manner to mitigate the possibility of false reassurance or negative reactions from their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0319992"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inaccurate risk perceptions of diabetes complications are responsible for the inertia among patients to engage in protective health behaviours. One potential approach to changing risk perceptions is to use social comparison of their diabetes to other people of similar clinicodemographic profiles.

Objectives: This study examined the perspectives of primary care physicians (PCPs) in ambulatory care on the utility of a patient similarity-based digital tool for risk communication to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: A qualitative study design using direct observation and in-depth interviews was conducted on 11 PCP participants. Participants had at least 6 months of clinical experience in ambulatory primary care. Participants went through three hypothetical case scenarios using the digital tool under direct observation and shared their perspectives on its utility during an in-depth interview. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: PCPs perceived the digital tool to be useful in educating patients with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled T2DM and to motivate them to achieve better glycated haemoglobin (HBA1c) levels. Patients who do not practise social comparison would refrain from HBA1c comparison and prefer to know the absolute state of their diabetes. PCPs were also concerned about patients' potential for false reassurance or negative reactions instead of correctly understanding the risk message intended for them.

Conclusion: The patient similarity-based digital tool requires further work to support PCPs in risk communication to patients with T2DM. Usage should be targeted at patient subgroups with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled T2DM and who practise social comparison. Strategies to maximise benefit include identifying patients who practise social comparison and training PCPs to be adept at framing and communicating risk information in a person-centric manner to mitigate the possibility of false reassurance or negative reactions from their patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于患者相似性的数字工具对2型糖尿病患者风险沟通的效用:初级保健医生在门诊护理中的观点
背景:对糖尿病并发症不准确的风险认知是导致患者采取保护性健康行为的惯性原因。改变风险认知的一种潜在方法是将他们的糖尿病与其他具有相似临床人口统计学特征的人进行社会比较。目的:本研究考察了初级保健医生(pcp)在门诊护理中使用基于患者相似性的数字工具对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者进行风险沟通的观点。方法:采用直接观察和深度访谈相结合的定性研究设计,对11名PCP参与者进行调查。参与者至少有6个月的门诊初级保健临床经验。参与者在直接观察下使用数字工具经历了三个假设的案例场景,并在深入采访中分享了他们对其效用的看法。使用专题分析对数据进行编码和分析。结果:pcp认为数字工具在教育新诊断或未控制的T2DM患者并激励他们达到更好的糖化血红蛋白(HBA1c)水平方面是有用的。不进行社会比较的患者会避免进行HBA1c比较,更愿意了解自己糖尿病的绝对状态。pcp还担心患者可能会产生虚假的安慰或负面反应,而不是正确理解针对他们的风险信息。结论:基于患者相似性的数字工具需要进一步的工作来支持pcp与T2DM患者的风险沟通。使用应针对新诊断或未控制的T2DM患者亚组,并进行社会比较。最大限度地提高效益的策略包括识别实施社会比较的患者,并培训pcp善于以人为中心的方式构建和传达风险信息,以减少患者虚假保证或负面反应的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信