Aki Fujiwara-Igarashi, Yuta Nakazawa, Takafumi Ohshima, Sho Goto, Masatoshi Ino, Yuji Hamamoto, Yoshinori Takeuchi, Hideyuki Kanemoto
{"title":"Construction of a Diagnostic Prediction Model for Feline Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Diseases in Japan Using Noninvasive Examinations.","authors":"Aki Fujiwara-Igarashi, Yuta Nakazawa, Takafumi Ohshima, Sho Goto, Masatoshi Ino, Yuji Hamamoto, Yoshinori Takeuchi, Hideyuki Kanemoto","doi":"10.1002/vms3.70296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although feline nasal and nasopharyngeal diseases (NNDs) often require advanced tests under general anaesthesia for definitive diagnosis, not all patients can undergo them.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to construct diagnostic prediction models for feline NNDs in Japan using noninvasive examinations, signalment and history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-nine cats diagnosed with NNDs, including representative diseases in Japan-nasal and nasopharyngeal tumours (NNT), rhinitis (RS) and nasopharyngeal stenosis (NPS)-were retrospectively investigated to construct prediction models (model group, GM). Thirty-nine cats diagnosed were prospectively investigated to validate their efficacy (validation group, GV). Three predictive models were developed: Models 1 and 2 were manually constructed, with Model 1 designed to predict NNT, RS and NPS individually and Model 2 distinguishing between these diseases. Model 3 was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Sensitivity, indicating the ability to identify cases of each disease, and specificity, reflecting the ability to exclude other diseases, were used to assess performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Model 1 of the GV, the sensitivity and specificity for NNT, RS and NPS were 1.00 and 0.73, 0.62 and 0.96 and 0.78 and 0.97, respectively. In Model 2 of the GV, the values were 0.94 and 0.86 for NNT, 0.77 and 0.92 for RS and 0.75 and 0.94 for NPS. In Model 3 of the GV, they were 0.94 and 0.05 for NNT, 0.25 and 1.00 for RS and 0.13 and 0.84 for NPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic prediction models, particularly Models 1 and 2, could help estimate whether advanced tests are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":23543,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","volume":"11 2","pages":"e70296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although feline nasal and nasopharyngeal diseases (NNDs) often require advanced tests under general anaesthesia for definitive diagnosis, not all patients can undergo them.
Objectives: This study aimed to construct diagnostic prediction models for feline NNDs in Japan using noninvasive examinations, signalment and history.
Methods: Seventy-nine cats diagnosed with NNDs, including representative diseases in Japan-nasal and nasopharyngeal tumours (NNT), rhinitis (RS) and nasopharyngeal stenosis (NPS)-were retrospectively investigated to construct prediction models (model group, GM). Thirty-nine cats diagnosed were prospectively investigated to validate their efficacy (validation group, GV). Three predictive models were developed: Models 1 and 2 were manually constructed, with Model 1 designed to predict NNT, RS and NPS individually and Model 2 distinguishing between these diseases. Model 3 was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Sensitivity, indicating the ability to identify cases of each disease, and specificity, reflecting the ability to exclude other diseases, were used to assess performance.
Results: In Model 1 of the GV, the sensitivity and specificity for NNT, RS and NPS were 1.00 and 0.73, 0.62 and 0.96 and 0.78 and 0.97, respectively. In Model 2 of the GV, the values were 0.94 and 0.86 for NNT, 0.77 and 0.92 for RS and 0.75 and 0.94 for NPS. In Model 3 of the GV, they were 0.94 and 0.05 for NNT, 0.25 and 1.00 for RS and 0.13 and 0.84 for NPS.
Conclusions: The diagnostic prediction models, particularly Models 1 and 2, could help estimate whether advanced tests are necessary.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Medicine and Science is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of veterinary medicine and science. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish interesting and high quality work in both fundamental and clinical veterinary medicine and science.
Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
We aim to be a truly global forum for high-quality research in veterinary medicine and science, and believe that the best research should be published and made widely accessible as quickly as possible. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from a select group of prestigious journals published by Wiley-Blackwell.
Veterinary Medicine and Science is a Wiley Open Access journal, one of a new series of peer-reviewed titles publishing quality research with speed and efficiency. For further information visit the Wiley Open Access website.