Giuliano B Borille, Gustavo A Pereira Filho, Mariana Zancanaro, Vinicius W Ribeiro, Renato Giannini, Lauro Carvalho
{"title":"Optimizing the Incision Marking in Abdominoplasty: 2-year Series.","authors":"Giuliano B Borille, Gustavo A Pereira Filho, Mariana Zancanaro, Vinicius W Ribeiro, Renato Giannini, Lauro Carvalho","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The resultant horizontal scar in abdominoplasty is primarily the result of 3 main factors: (1) preoperative skin marking planning, (2) undermining area, and (3) dermal adipose flap traction symmetry. Although distinct preoperative marking routines have been described in the literature, there are few records of the systematic use of a standard template for that purpose. The authors created the template used in this study 12 years ago and now make an objective critical analysis of its results from the last 2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a period of 30 months, 147 patients underwent abdominoplasty using the standard template to optimize the preoperative skin markings. All patients underwent an evaluation, through digital photograph, by 2 independent senior plastic surgeons, using an objective grading system for aesthetic outcomes proposed by Strasser, at least 6 months after the operation. All resultant scar shapes underwent a measurement analysis through Mirror Image software, version 6.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the Strasser objective grade system, 147 (95%) patients were considered to have good and excellent results. Five (4%) patients were considered moderate, and 3 (2%) had poor results. The analysis of the scar shape through the Mirror software has shown reproducibility with an angle variation of only 3 degrees. The overall complication rate was 6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The template described provides the reproducibility of its results, creating a symmetric and balanced abdominoplasty horizontal scar, saving operative time, and lowering cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 3","pages":"e6640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The resultant horizontal scar in abdominoplasty is primarily the result of 3 main factors: (1) preoperative skin marking planning, (2) undermining area, and (3) dermal adipose flap traction symmetry. Although distinct preoperative marking routines have been described in the literature, there are few records of the systematic use of a standard template for that purpose. The authors created the template used in this study 12 years ago and now make an objective critical analysis of its results from the last 2 years.
Methods: Over a period of 30 months, 147 patients underwent abdominoplasty using the standard template to optimize the preoperative skin markings. All patients underwent an evaluation, through digital photograph, by 2 independent senior plastic surgeons, using an objective grading system for aesthetic outcomes proposed by Strasser, at least 6 months after the operation. All resultant scar shapes underwent a measurement analysis through Mirror Image software, version 6.0.
Results: According to the Strasser objective grade system, 147 (95%) patients were considered to have good and excellent results. Five (4%) patients were considered moderate, and 3 (2%) had poor results. The analysis of the scar shape through the Mirror software has shown reproducibility with an angle variation of only 3 degrees. The overall complication rate was 6%.
Conclusions: The template described provides the reproducibility of its results, creating a symmetric and balanced abdominoplasty horizontal scar, saving operative time, and lowering cost.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.