Photon-counting CT-derived Quantification of Hepatic Fat Fraction: A Clinical Validation Study.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.241677
Tatjana Dell, Narine Mesropyan, Yannik Layer, Verena Tischler, Leonie Weinhold, Johannes Chang, Christian Jansen, Bernhard Schmidt, Markus Jürgens, Alexander Isaak, Patrick Kupczyk, Claus Christian Pieper, Carsten Meyer, Julian Luetkens, Daniel Kuetting
{"title":"Photon-counting CT-derived Quantification of Hepatic Fat Fraction: A Clinical Validation Study.","authors":"Tatjana Dell, Narine Mesropyan, Yannik Layer, Verena Tischler, Leonie Weinhold, Johannes Chang, Christian Jansen, Bernhard Schmidt, Markus Jürgens, Alexander Isaak, Patrick Kupczyk, Claus Christian Pieper, Carsten Meyer, Julian Luetkens, Daniel Kuetting","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Steatosis is a critical health problem, creating a growing need for opportunistic screening. Early detection may allow for effective treatment and prevention of further liver complications. Purpose To evaluate photon-counting CT (PCCT) fat quantification on contrast-enhanced scans and validate the results against fat quantification via histopathologic assessment, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) from transient elastography, and MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational clinical study, PCCT-derived fat fraction quantification was assessed in participants with known or suspected liver disease. Participants underwent PCCT between February 2022 and January 2024. Participants also underwent biopsy, US with CAP measurement, or MRI with a PDFF sequence for hepatic fat fraction quantification. Liver fat fraction was measured on virtual noncontrast PCCT images using spectral processing software with a three-material decomposition algorithm for fat, liver tissue, and iodine. Steatosis was graded for each modality. Correlation between PCCT-based steatosis grades and biopsy- and CAP-based grades was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF measurements was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine the optimal PCCT fat fraction threshold for distinguishing between participants with and those without steatosis. Results The study included 178 participants, of whom 27 (mean age, 60.7 years ± 15.2 [SD]; 18 male participants) underwent liver biopsy, 26 (mean age, 60.0 years ± 18.3; 15 male participants) underwent CAP measurement, and 125 (mean age, 61.2 years ± 13.1; 70 male participants) underwent MRI PDFF measurement. There was excellent agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF assessment of liver fat fraction (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]). In stratified analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.93) in participants with known fibrosis and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) in participants without fibrosis. There was moderate correlation of PCCT-based steatosis grade with histologic (ρ = 0.65) and CAP-based (ρ = 0.45) steatosis grade. Based on the Youden index, the PCCT fat fraction threshold that best discriminated between participants with and those without steatosis was 4.8%, with a maximum achievable sensitivity of 81% (38 of 47) and a specificity of 71% (55 of 78). Conclusion PCCT in a standard clinical setting allowed for accurate estimation of liver fat fraction compared with MRI PDFF-based reference standard measurements. © RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Kartalis and Grigoriadis in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e241677"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.241677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Steatosis is a critical health problem, creating a growing need for opportunistic screening. Early detection may allow for effective treatment and prevention of further liver complications. Purpose To evaluate photon-counting CT (PCCT) fat quantification on contrast-enhanced scans and validate the results against fat quantification via histopathologic assessment, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) from transient elastography, and MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational clinical study, PCCT-derived fat fraction quantification was assessed in participants with known or suspected liver disease. Participants underwent PCCT between February 2022 and January 2024. Participants also underwent biopsy, US with CAP measurement, or MRI with a PDFF sequence for hepatic fat fraction quantification. Liver fat fraction was measured on virtual noncontrast PCCT images using spectral processing software with a three-material decomposition algorithm for fat, liver tissue, and iodine. Steatosis was graded for each modality. Correlation between PCCT-based steatosis grades and biopsy- and CAP-based grades was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF measurements was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine the optimal PCCT fat fraction threshold for distinguishing between participants with and those without steatosis. Results The study included 178 participants, of whom 27 (mean age, 60.7 years ± 15.2 [SD]; 18 male participants) underwent liver biopsy, 26 (mean age, 60.0 years ± 18.3; 15 male participants) underwent CAP measurement, and 125 (mean age, 61.2 years ± 13.1; 70 male participants) underwent MRI PDFF measurement. There was excellent agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF assessment of liver fat fraction (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]). In stratified analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.93) in participants with known fibrosis and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) in participants without fibrosis. There was moderate correlation of PCCT-based steatosis grade with histologic (ρ = 0.65) and CAP-based (ρ = 0.45) steatosis grade. Based on the Youden index, the PCCT fat fraction threshold that best discriminated between participants with and those without steatosis was 4.8%, with a maximum achievable sensitivity of 81% (38 of 47) and a specificity of 71% (55 of 78). Conclusion PCCT in a standard clinical setting allowed for accurate estimation of liver fat fraction compared with MRI PDFF-based reference standard measurements. © RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Kartalis and Grigoriadis in this issue.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信