Impact of Margins on Outcomes in HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Surgery Only.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Omar A Karadaghy, Michael P Wu, Nathan Farrokhian, Maria Armache, Nadia L Samaha, Rohith Bhethanabotla, Danielle M Gillard, Swapnil V Shah, Abigail E Reid, Carole Fakhry, William R Ryan, Jeremy Richmon, Andrew J Holcomb
{"title":"Impact of Margins on Outcomes in HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Surgery Only.","authors":"Omar A Karadaghy, Michael P Wu, Nathan Farrokhian, Maria Armache, Nadia L Samaha, Rohith Bhethanabotla, Danielle M Gillard, Swapnil V Shah, Abigail E Reid, Carole Fakhry, William R Ryan, Jeremy Richmon, Andrew J Holcomb","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of surgical margin status in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCCa) and examine the potential for revising surgical margin standards in HPV+ OPSCCa.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted across 4 tertiary oncology centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Charts of patients treated from 2010 to 2022 for HPV+ OPSCCa were reviewed. Eligible patients underwent surgery without adjuvant treatment for nonrecurrent, nonmetastatic HPV+ OPSCCa. Demographic, oncologic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. Patients with prior head and neck radiation or adjuvant therapy were excluded. Local control, locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared based on surgical margins using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 194 qualified cases, with a median follow-up of 41.63 months, most cases were pT1 (64.43%) or pT2 (34.54%). Recurrence occurred in 8.76% of patients, with most salvaged successfully. Analysis on univariable and multivariable modeling determined that margins less than 1 mm were considered close, and those ≥1 mm were considered clear. On multivariable modeling, surgical margins of <1 mm were associated with a hazard ratio of 3.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-9.30) for LRR and 2.95 (95% CI 1.41-6.16) for DFS when compared to cases where margins were clear by 1 mm or greater.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this multi-institutional cohort of early-stage HPV+ OPSCCa treated surgically without adjuvant therapy, margins <1 mm were associated with worse LRR and DFS. This suggests that traditional definitions of close margins in HPV-negative disease may not apply to HPV+ OPSCCa, warranting a revised definition for surgical margin standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of surgical margin status in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCCa) and examine the potential for revising surgical margin standards in HPV+ OPSCCa.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Setting: This study was conducted across 4 tertiary oncology centers.

Methods: Charts of patients treated from 2010 to 2022 for HPV+ OPSCCa were reviewed. Eligible patients underwent surgery without adjuvant treatment for nonrecurrent, nonmetastatic HPV+ OPSCCa. Demographic, oncologic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. Patients with prior head and neck radiation or adjuvant therapy were excluded. Local control, locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared based on surgical margins using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Among 194 qualified cases, with a median follow-up of 41.63 months, most cases were pT1 (64.43%) or pT2 (34.54%). Recurrence occurred in 8.76% of patients, with most salvaged successfully. Analysis on univariable and multivariable modeling determined that margins less than 1 mm were considered close, and those ≥1 mm were considered clear. On multivariable modeling, surgical margins of <1 mm were associated with a hazard ratio of 3.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-9.30) for LRR and 2.95 (95% CI 1.41-6.16) for DFS when compared to cases where margins were clear by 1 mm or greater.

Conclusion: In this multi-institutional cohort of early-stage HPV+ OPSCCa treated surgically without adjuvant therapy, margins <1 mm were associated with worse LRR and DFS. This suggests that traditional definitions of close margins in HPV-negative disease may not apply to HPV+ OPSCCa, warranting a revised definition for surgical margin standards.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信