Perspectives on long-term medical management of urea cycle disorders: insights from a survey of UK healthcare professionals.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Karolina M Stepien, Melanie McSweeney, Antonio Ochoa-Ferraro, Roshni Vara, Paul Riley, Megan Smith
{"title":"Perspectives on long-term medical management of urea cycle disorders: insights from a survey of UK healthcare professionals.","authors":"Karolina M Stepien, Melanie McSweeney, Antonio Ochoa-Ferraro, Roshni Vara, Paul Riley, Megan Smith","doi":"10.1186/s13023-025-03647-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inborn errors of metabolism which impact the body's ability to detoxify ammonia produced during protein metabolism. In the UK, there is a nationally adopted guideline for the emergency management of hyperammonaemia in UCD patients, however there is no guideline for long‑term management, and treatment decisions are left to the discretion of individual healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three HCPs, comprising 13 (57%) metabolic consultants, two (9%) specialist nurses, four (17%) pharmacists, and four (17%) dietitians, participated in interviews to document their attitudes and beliefs regarding the long‑term management of UCD patients, including their current practices, treatment goals, and clinical ambitions. The highest priority for 14/23 (61%) of HCPs was to minimise the risk of hyperammonaemia, however the ammonia level that HCPs advised they aimed for varied significantly, with some targeting above the upper limit of normal. Glycerol phenylbutyrate was the highest ranked ammonia scavenger treatment amongst HCPs for safety, tolerability, duration of scavenging action and reducing patient burden, and HCPs suggested that it would be the first-line treatment in an updated guideline. All prescribing HCPs agreed they would prefer their patients receive a licenced product rather than an unlicensed one for reasons including more reliable supply, greater insurance/legitimacy, and the reassurance of regulatory scrutiny and approval. However, analysis of NHS England's dispensing data between July 2023 and June 2024 indicated annual spend on nitrogen scavengers of £6.7 million with unlicensed specials accounting for £3 million (45%) of the total. Differences between HCPs in the awareness of clinically relevant characteristics of ammonia scavengers, including their sodium and propylene glycol content, were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To standardise the treatment of UCDs within and between metabolic centres in the UK, there is merit in developing a UK-specific treatment guideline.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03647-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inborn errors of metabolism which impact the body's ability to detoxify ammonia produced during protein metabolism. In the UK, there is a nationally adopted guideline for the emergency management of hyperammonaemia in UCD patients, however there is no guideline for long‑term management, and treatment decisions are left to the discretion of individual healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Results: Twenty-three HCPs, comprising 13 (57%) metabolic consultants, two (9%) specialist nurses, four (17%) pharmacists, and four (17%) dietitians, participated in interviews to document their attitudes and beliefs regarding the long‑term management of UCD patients, including their current practices, treatment goals, and clinical ambitions. The highest priority for 14/23 (61%) of HCPs was to minimise the risk of hyperammonaemia, however the ammonia level that HCPs advised they aimed for varied significantly, with some targeting above the upper limit of normal. Glycerol phenylbutyrate was the highest ranked ammonia scavenger treatment amongst HCPs for safety, tolerability, duration of scavenging action and reducing patient burden, and HCPs suggested that it would be the first-line treatment in an updated guideline. All prescribing HCPs agreed they would prefer their patients receive a licenced product rather than an unlicensed one for reasons including more reliable supply, greater insurance/legitimacy, and the reassurance of regulatory scrutiny and approval. However, analysis of NHS England's dispensing data between July 2023 and June 2024 indicated annual spend on nitrogen scavengers of £6.7 million with unlicensed specials accounting for £3 million (45%) of the total. Differences between HCPs in the awareness of clinically relevant characteristics of ammonia scavengers, including their sodium and propylene glycol content, were observed.

Conclusions: To standardise the treatment of UCDs within and between metabolic centres in the UK, there is merit in developing a UK-specific treatment guideline.

尿素循环障碍的长期医疗管理观点:来自英国医疗保健专业人员调查的见解。
背景:尿素循环障碍(UCDs)是一种罕见的先天性代谢缺陷,影响机体对蛋白质代谢过程中产生的氨的解毒能力。在英国,对于UCD患者高氨血症的紧急管理有一个全国采用的指南,但是没有长期管理的指南,治疗决定留给个人医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的自由裁量权。结果:23名HCPs,包括13名(57%)代谢顾问、2名(9%)专科护士、4名(17%)药剂师和4名(17%)营养师,参与了访谈,记录了他们对UCD患者长期管理的态度和信念,包括他们目前的做法、治疗目标和临床抱负。14/23(61%)的HCPs最优先考虑的是将高氨血症的风险降至最低,然而HCPs建议他们的目标氨水平差异很大,有些目标高于正常上限。在安全性、耐受性、清除作用持续时间和减轻患者负担方面,苯基丁酸甘油是HCPs中排名最高的氨清除剂治疗,HCPs建议在更新的指南中将其列为一线治疗。所有开处方的hcp都同意,他们更希望患者获得许可的产品,而不是未经许可的产品,原因包括更可靠的供应,更大的保险/合法性,以及监管审查和批准的保证。然而,对2023年7月至2024年6月英国国家医疗服务体系分配数据的分析表明,每年用于氮清除剂的支出为670万英镑,其中无证特种药品占300万英镑(45%)。观察了HCPs对氨清除剂临床相关特征(包括其钠和丙二醇含量)的认识差异。结论:为了使英国代谢中心内部和中心之间的ucd治疗标准化,制定英国特定的治疗指南是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信