Perspectives on long-term medical management of urea cycle disorders: insights from a survey of UK healthcare professionals.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Karolina M Stepien, Melanie McSweeney, Antonio Ochoa-Ferraro, Roshni Vara, Paul Riley, Megan Smith
{"title":"Perspectives on long-term medical management of urea cycle disorders: insights from a survey of UK healthcare professionals.","authors":"Karolina M Stepien, Melanie McSweeney, Antonio Ochoa-Ferraro, Roshni Vara, Paul Riley, Megan Smith","doi":"10.1186/s13023-025-03647-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inborn errors of metabolism which impact the body's ability to detoxify ammonia produced during protein metabolism. In the UK, there is a nationally adopted guideline for the emergency management of hyperammonaemia in UCD patients, however there is no guideline for long‑term management, and treatment decisions are left to the discretion of individual healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three HCPs, comprising 13 (57%) metabolic consultants, two (9%) specialist nurses, four (17%) pharmacists, and four (17%) dietitians, participated in interviews to document their attitudes and beliefs regarding the long‑term management of UCD patients, including their current practices, treatment goals, and clinical ambitions. The highest priority for 14/23 (61%) of HCPs was to minimise the risk of hyperammonaemia, however the ammonia level that HCPs advised they aimed for varied significantly, with some targeting above the upper limit of normal. Glycerol phenylbutyrate was the highest ranked ammonia scavenger treatment amongst HCPs for safety, tolerability, duration of scavenging action and reducing patient burden, and HCPs suggested that it would be the first-line treatment in an updated guideline. All prescribing HCPs agreed they would prefer their patients receive a licenced product rather than an unlicensed one for reasons including more reliable supply, greater insurance/legitimacy, and the reassurance of regulatory scrutiny and approval. However, analysis of NHS England's dispensing data between July 2023 and June 2024 indicated annual spend on nitrogen scavengers of £6.7 million with unlicensed specials accounting for £3 million (45%) of the total. Differences between HCPs in the awareness of clinically relevant characteristics of ammonia scavengers, including their sodium and propylene glycol content, were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To standardise the treatment of UCDs within and between metabolic centres in the UK, there is merit in developing a UK-specific treatment guideline.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03647-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inborn errors of metabolism which impact the body's ability to detoxify ammonia produced during protein metabolism. In the UK, there is a nationally adopted guideline for the emergency management of hyperammonaemia in UCD patients, however there is no guideline for long‑term management, and treatment decisions are left to the discretion of individual healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Results: Twenty-three HCPs, comprising 13 (57%) metabolic consultants, two (9%) specialist nurses, four (17%) pharmacists, and four (17%) dietitians, participated in interviews to document their attitudes and beliefs regarding the long‑term management of UCD patients, including their current practices, treatment goals, and clinical ambitions. The highest priority for 14/23 (61%) of HCPs was to minimise the risk of hyperammonaemia, however the ammonia level that HCPs advised they aimed for varied significantly, with some targeting above the upper limit of normal. Glycerol phenylbutyrate was the highest ranked ammonia scavenger treatment amongst HCPs for safety, tolerability, duration of scavenging action and reducing patient burden, and HCPs suggested that it would be the first-line treatment in an updated guideline. All prescribing HCPs agreed they would prefer their patients receive a licenced product rather than an unlicensed one for reasons including more reliable supply, greater insurance/legitimacy, and the reassurance of regulatory scrutiny and approval. However, analysis of NHS England's dispensing data between July 2023 and June 2024 indicated annual spend on nitrogen scavengers of £6.7 million with unlicensed specials accounting for £3 million (45%) of the total. Differences between HCPs in the awareness of clinically relevant characteristics of ammonia scavengers, including their sodium and propylene glycol content, were observed.

Conclusions: To standardise the treatment of UCDs within and between metabolic centres in the UK, there is merit in developing a UK-specific treatment guideline.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信