A study to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpressing breast cancer.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.104019
Dharmendra Singh, Pritanjali Singh, Amiy Arnav, Nishit Ranjan, Ashis Ranjan
{"title":"A study to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpressing breast cancer.","authors":"Dharmendra Singh, Pritanjali Singh, Amiy Arnav, Nishit Ranjan, Ashis Ranjan","doi":"10.5603/rpor.104019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective single institutional study was conducted to compare the efficacy of the two different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimens in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2neu) overexpressing non metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients randomly assigned into two arms in a 1:1 ratio. Arm A received NACT containing docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) regimen. Arm B received NACT containing docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH) regimen. Patients underwent surgical intervention following completion of 6 cycles of NACT. Postoperative histopathological reports were compared in terms of pathological response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>122 patients (Arm A = 61; Arm B = 61) analysed. The mean breast tumor size was 7.724 cm and 7.896 cm in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, at diagnosis and clinical staging. After 6 cycles of NACT, the mean breast tumor size in Arm A and Arm B was 3.495 cm and 3.711 cm, respectively. The Arm A and Arm B exhibited 22.9% and 40.9% of pathological complete response (pCR), respectively, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.033). All patients experienced varying degrees of bone marrow suppression. Grade 2 or 3 chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting was 37.7% and 23% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, without statistically significant difference (p = 0.076). 14.8% and 4.9% of patients exhibited febrile neutropenia in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, without statistically significant differences (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCH exhibited greater pCR with tolerable adverse reactions in Her2neu overexpressing breast cancer compared to TAC regimen as NACT. Therefore, TCH regimen should be considered for node positive Her2neu overexpressing breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"29 6","pages":"764-775"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.104019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective single institutional study was conducted to compare the efficacy of the two different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimens in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2neu) overexpressing non metastatic breast cancer.

Materials and methods: Patients randomly assigned into two arms in a 1:1 ratio. Arm A received NACT containing docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) regimen. Arm B received NACT containing docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH) regimen. Patients underwent surgical intervention following completion of 6 cycles of NACT. Postoperative histopathological reports were compared in terms of pathological response.

Results: 122 patients (Arm A = 61; Arm B = 61) analysed. The mean breast tumor size was 7.724 cm and 7.896 cm in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, at diagnosis and clinical staging. After 6 cycles of NACT, the mean breast tumor size in Arm A and Arm B was 3.495 cm and 3.711 cm, respectively. The Arm A and Arm B exhibited 22.9% and 40.9% of pathological complete response (pCR), respectively, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.033). All patients experienced varying degrees of bone marrow suppression. Grade 2 or 3 chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting was 37.7% and 23% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, without statistically significant difference (p = 0.076). 14.8% and 4.9% of patients exhibited febrile neutropenia in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, without statistically significant differences (p = 0.067).

Conclusion: TCH exhibited greater pCR with tolerable adverse reactions in Her2neu overexpressing breast cancer compared to TAC regimen as NACT. Therefore, TCH regimen should be considered for node positive Her2neu overexpressing breast cancer.

比较新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期人表皮生长因子受体2过表达乳腺癌疗效的研究。
背景:本前瞻性单机构研究旨在比较两种不同的新辅助化疗(NACT)方案对人表皮生长因子受体2 (Her2neu)过表达的非转移性乳腺癌的疗效。材料与方法:患者按1:1的比例随机分为两组。A组接受含有多西紫杉醇、阿霉素和环磷酰胺(TAC)方案的NACT治疗。B组接受含有多西紫杉醇、卡铂和曲妥珠单抗(TCH)方案的NACT治疗。患者在完成6个NACT周期后接受手术干预。比较术后组织病理学报告的病理反应。结果:122例患者(A组61例;B组= 61)。在诊断和临床分期时,A组和B组的平均乳腺肿瘤大小分别为7.724 cm和7.896 cm。NACT治疗6个周期后,A组和B组乳腺肿瘤平均大小分别为3.495 cm和3.711 cm。A组和B组病理完全缓解率分别为22.9%和40.9%,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.033)。所有患者均出现不同程度的骨髓抑制。2级或3级化疗引起的恶心呕吐在A组和B组分别为37.7%和23%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.076)。A组发热性中性粒细胞减少14.8%,B组发热性中性粒细胞减少4.9%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.067)。结论:与TAC方案相比,TCH方案在Her2neu过表达乳腺癌中表现出更大的pCR和可耐受的不良反应。因此,对于淋巴结阳性Her2neu过表达乳腺癌,应考虑TCH方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信