{"title":"A prospective observational study of decision-making by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis upon recommendation for PEG enteral feeding tubes.","authors":"Kay Tran, Heather A Hayes, Mark Bromberg","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand challenges surrounding acceptance of a percutaneous endoscopic gastroscopic enteral feeding tube by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of 41 patients and care partners attending a multidisciplinary Motor Neuron Disease clinic. Surveys were administered pregastrostomy tube placement (N = 23) and postplacement (N = 41). Some were not available both pre- and postplacement). For preplacement, we queried barriers affecting their decision for receiving a gastrostomy tube at the time of recommendation. For postplacement, we queried factors that influenced their decision as well as perceived benefit and satisfaction with use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient concerns about receiving a gastrostomy tube centered on the procedure, possible pain/infection (48%), limitations on activities (44%), impact on body image, and possible extension of life. For patients who received a gastrostomy tube, satisfaction was very high (93%), and there was reduced patient (59%) and care partners (54%) stress. The average BMI was 28.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup> at diagnosis, and there was no net gain in weight. The average time until placement of a gastrostomy tube following recommendation was 145 days (range 13-824 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite counseling at multiple time points, the decision to obtain a feeding tube is often challenging for patients and care partners. Gastrostomy tube placement was perceived as a substantial benefit. Addressing these barriers may reduce concerns and promote earlier decision-making to maximize the benefits of placing a gastrostomy tube sooner.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To understand challenges surrounding acceptance of a percutaneous endoscopic gastroscopic enteral feeding tube by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective observational study.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 41 patients and care partners attending a multidisciplinary Motor Neuron Disease clinic. Surveys were administered pregastrostomy tube placement (N = 23) and postplacement (N = 41). Some were not available both pre- and postplacement). For preplacement, we queried barriers affecting their decision for receiving a gastrostomy tube at the time of recommendation. For postplacement, we queried factors that influenced their decision as well as perceived benefit and satisfaction with use.
Results: Patient concerns about receiving a gastrostomy tube centered on the procedure, possible pain/infection (48%), limitations on activities (44%), impact on body image, and possible extension of life. For patients who received a gastrostomy tube, satisfaction was very high (93%), and there was reduced patient (59%) and care partners (54%) stress. The average BMI was 28.6 kg/m2 at diagnosis, and there was no net gain in weight. The average time until placement of a gastrostomy tube following recommendation was 145 days (range 13-824 days).
Conclusions: Despite counseling at multiple time points, the decision to obtain a feeding tube is often challenging for patients and care partners. Gastrostomy tube placement was perceived as a substantial benefit. Addressing these barriers may reduce concerns and promote earlier decision-making to maximize the benefits of placing a gastrostomy tube sooner.
期刊介绍:
NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).