A prospective observational study of decision-making by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis upon recommendation for PEG enteral feeding tubes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Kay Tran, Heather A Hayes, Mark Bromberg
{"title":"A prospective observational study of decision-making by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis upon recommendation for PEG enteral feeding tubes.","authors":"Kay Tran, Heather A Hayes, Mark Bromberg","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand challenges surrounding acceptance of a percutaneous endoscopic gastroscopic enteral feeding tube by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of 41 patients and care partners attending a multidisciplinary Motor Neuron Disease clinic. Surveys were administered pregastrostomy tube placement (N = 23) and postplacement (N = 41). Some were not available both pre- and postplacement). For preplacement, we queried barriers affecting their decision for receiving a gastrostomy tube at the time of recommendation. For postplacement, we queried factors that influenced their decision as well as perceived benefit and satisfaction with use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient concerns about receiving a gastrostomy tube centered on the procedure, possible pain/infection (48%), limitations on activities (44%), impact on body image, and possible extension of life. For patients who received a gastrostomy tube, satisfaction was very high (93%), and there was reduced patient (59%) and care partners (54%) stress. The average BMI was 28.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup> at diagnosis, and there was no net gain in weight. The average time until placement of a gastrostomy tube following recommendation was 145 days (range 13-824 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite counseling at multiple time points, the decision to obtain a feeding tube is often challenging for patients and care partners. Gastrostomy tube placement was perceived as a substantial benefit. Addressing these barriers may reduce concerns and promote earlier decision-making to maximize the benefits of placing a gastrostomy tube sooner.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand challenges surrounding acceptance of a percutaneous endoscopic gastroscopic enteral feeding tube by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective observational study.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 41 patients and care partners attending a multidisciplinary Motor Neuron Disease clinic. Surveys were administered pregastrostomy tube placement (N = 23) and postplacement (N = 41). Some were not available both pre- and postplacement). For preplacement, we queried barriers affecting their decision for receiving a gastrostomy tube at the time of recommendation. For postplacement, we queried factors that influenced their decision as well as perceived benefit and satisfaction with use.

Results: Patient concerns about receiving a gastrostomy tube centered on the procedure, possible pain/infection (48%), limitations on activities (44%), impact on body image, and possible extension of life. For patients who received a gastrostomy tube, satisfaction was very high (93%), and there was reduced patient (59%) and care partners (54%) stress. The average BMI was 28.6 kg/m2 at diagnosis, and there was no net gain in weight. The average time until placement of a gastrostomy tube following recommendation was 145 days (range 13-824 days).

Conclusions: Despite counseling at multiple time points, the decision to obtain a feeding tube is often challenging for patients and care partners. Gastrostomy tube placement was perceived as a substantial benefit. Addressing these barriers may reduce concerns and promote earlier decision-making to maximize the benefits of placing a gastrostomy tube sooner.

一项前瞻性观察研究,旨在了解肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者在被推荐使用 PEG 肠内喂养管时的决策情况。
目的:了解肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者接受经皮内镜胃镜肠内喂食管的挑战:一项前瞻性观察研究。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,41名患者和护理伙伴参加了多学科运动神经元疾病诊所。调查对象分别为胃造口前插管(N = 23)和术后插管(N = 41)。有些在安置前和安置后都不可用)。对于预置,我们询问了在推荐时影响他们接受胃造口管决定的障碍。对于安置后,我们询问了影响他们决定的因素,以及对使用的感知利益和满意度。结果:患者对接受胃造口管的担忧主要集中在手术过程、可能的疼痛/感染(48%)、活动受限(44%)、对身体形象的影响以及可能延长的生命。对于接受胃造口管的患者,满意度非常高(93%),并且减少了患者(59%)和护理伙伴(54%)的压力。诊断时的平均BMI为28.6 kg/m2,体重没有净增加。按照建议放置胃造口管的平均时间为145天(范围13-824天)。结论:尽管在多个时间点咨询,获得饲管的决定往往是具有挑战性的病人和护理伙伴。胃造口管放置被认为是一个实质性的好处。解决这些障碍可以减少担忧,促进早期决策,以最大限度地提高尽早放置胃造口管的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信