Limitations of sequence dissimilarity as a predictor of prokaryotic lineage.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Open Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1098/rsob.240302
Alvar A Lavin, Juan Rivas-Santisteban
{"title":"Limitations of sequence dissimilarity as a predictor of prokaryotic lineage.","authors":"Alvar A Lavin, Juan Rivas-Santisteban","doi":"10.1098/rsob.240302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The molecular clock rests upon the assumption that the observed changes among sequences capture the differentiation of lineages, or kinship, as dissimilarity increases with time. Although it has been questioned over the years, this paradigmatic principle continues to underlie the idea that the polymorphic space of a gene is so vast that it is unattainable in evolutionary time. Thus, the molecular clock has been used to obtain taxonomic annotations, proving to be very effective at delivering testable results. In this article, however, we ask how often this assumption leads to inaccuracies when inferring the lineage of prokaryotic genes. Thus, we open an interesting discussion by simulating, in realistic scenarios, the critical times in which specific 5S rRNA sequences of two distant lineages are exhausting the polymorphic space. We contend that certain genes in one lineage will become increasingly similar to those in another over time, as the space for new variants is finite, mimicking phylogenetic features by convergence or by chance, without implying true kinship.</p>","PeriodicalId":19629,"journal":{"name":"Open Biology","volume":"15 3","pages":"240302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.240302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The molecular clock rests upon the assumption that the observed changes among sequences capture the differentiation of lineages, or kinship, as dissimilarity increases with time. Although it has been questioned over the years, this paradigmatic principle continues to underlie the idea that the polymorphic space of a gene is so vast that it is unattainable in evolutionary time. Thus, the molecular clock has been used to obtain taxonomic annotations, proving to be very effective at delivering testable results. In this article, however, we ask how often this assumption leads to inaccuracies when inferring the lineage of prokaryotic genes. Thus, we open an interesting discussion by simulating, in realistic scenarios, the critical times in which specific 5S rRNA sequences of two distant lineages are exhausting the polymorphic space. We contend that certain genes in one lineage will become increasingly similar to those in another over time, as the space for new variants is finite, mimicking phylogenetic features by convergence or by chance, without implying true kinship.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

序列异质性作为原核生物血统预测指标的局限性
分子钟建立在这样的假设之上,即观察到的序列之间的变化捕捉到了谱系或亲属关系的分化,因为差异随着时间的推移而增加。尽管多年来它一直受到质疑,但这一范式原则仍然是基因多态性空间如此巨大以至于在进化时间内无法实现的想法的基础。因此,分子钟已被用于获得分类注释,证明在提供可测试的结果方面非常有效。然而,在这篇文章中,我们询问在推断原核生物基因的谱系时,这种假设经常导致不准确。因此,我们通过在现实场景中模拟两个远缘谱系的特定5S rRNA序列耗尽多态性空间的关键时刻,展开了一个有趣的讨论。我们认为,随着时间的推移,一个谱系中的某些基因将与另一个谱系中的某些基因变得越来越相似,因为新的变异空间是有限的,通过趋同或偶然来模仿系统发育特征,而不意味着真正的亲缘关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Biology
Open Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Biology is an online journal that welcomes original, high impact research in cell and developmental biology, molecular and structural biology, biochemistry, neuroscience, immunology, microbiology and genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信