Efficiency of cervical cerclage and pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a case-control study from a tertiary center.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5968
Göksun Ipek, Atakan Tanaçan, Ilım Demet, Zahid Ağaoğlu, Ezgi Başaran, Özgür Kara, Dilek Şahin
{"title":"Efficiency of cervical cerclage and pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a case-control study from a tertiary center.","authors":"Göksun Ipek, Atakan Tanaçan, Ilım Demet, Zahid Ağaoğlu, Ezgi Başaran, Özgür Kara, Dilek Şahin","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>This study evaluated the efficiency of cervical cerclage and pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study included 46 cases of twin pregnancy with cervical insufficiency delivered at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were grouped as those receiving cervical cerclage in addition to vaginal progesterone (n = 10), cervical pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone (n = 11), and only vaginal progesterone (n = 25). Patients' data were obtained from the hospital's database. Obstetric parameters (gravidity, parity, abortion, artificial reproductive technologies, second-trimester abortion) and ultrasound parameters (cervical length, intraamniotic sludge) were recorded. Gestational week at birth, latency period (diagnosis to delivery), and delivery after 34 weeks were evaluated for effectiveness. All parameters were compared between groups and evaluated for effectiveness as an independent factor for preterm birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary effectiveness parameters of latency period, birth week, and delivery after 34 weeks did not differ statistically between groups. When the parameters were evaluated independently of treatment groups for their effects on delivery after 34 weeks with multivariate regression analysis, the presence of intraamniotic sludge was found to be a negative independent factor for delivery after 34 weeks (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical cerclage or pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone had no additional benefit for achieving birth after 34 gestational weeks. The only factor that had a negative effect on birth after 34 gestational weeks was the presence of intraamniotic sludge. Our clinical experience with twin pregnancies may provide insight into treatment options for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 1","pages":"271-276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: This study evaluated the efficiency of cervical cerclage and pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies.

Materials and methods: This retrospective case-control study included 46 cases of twin pregnancy with cervical insufficiency delivered at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were grouped as those receiving cervical cerclage in addition to vaginal progesterone (n = 10), cervical pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone (n = 11), and only vaginal progesterone (n = 25). Patients' data were obtained from the hospital's database. Obstetric parameters (gravidity, parity, abortion, artificial reproductive technologies, second-trimester abortion) and ultrasound parameters (cervical length, intraamniotic sludge) were recorded. Gestational week at birth, latency period (diagnosis to delivery), and delivery after 34 weeks were evaluated for effectiveness. All parameters were compared between groups and evaluated for effectiveness as an independent factor for preterm birth.

Results: The primary effectiveness parameters of latency period, birth week, and delivery after 34 weeks did not differ statistically between groups. When the parameters were evaluated independently of treatment groups for their effects on delivery after 34 weeks with multivariate regression analysis, the presence of intraamniotic sludge was found to be a negative independent factor for delivery after 34 weeks (p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Cervical cerclage or pessary in addition to vaginal progesterone had no additional benefit for achieving birth after 34 gestational weeks. The only factor that had a negative effect on birth after 34 gestational weeks was the presence of intraamniotic sludge. Our clinical experience with twin pregnancies may provide insight into treatment options for clinicians.

在使用阴道黄体酮的同时使用宫颈环扎术和子宫环扎术预防双胎妊娠早产的效率:一项来自三级医疗中心的病例对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信