Distinct impact of RF and ACPA titre on the effectiveness and persistency of biologics and JAK inhibitors: The ANSWER cohort study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Yuki Etani, Yasutaka Okita, Yuichi Maeda, Kohei Tsujimoto, Makoto Hirao, Akira Onishi, Hideo Onizawa, Takaichi Okano, Keisuke Nishimura, Ayaka Yoshikawa, Hideyuki Shiba, Hideki Amuro, Yonsu Son, Motomu Hashimoto, Tadashi Okano, Ryota Hara, Wataru Yamamoto, Shotaro Tachibana, Shinya Hayashi, Takaaki Noguchi, Atsushi Kumanogoh, Seiji Okada, Ken Nakata, Kosuke Ebina
{"title":"Distinct impact of RF and ACPA titre on the effectiveness and persistency of biologics and JAK inhibitors: The ANSWER cohort study.","authors":"Yuki Etani, Yasutaka Okita, Yuichi Maeda, Kohei Tsujimoto, Makoto Hirao, Akira Onishi, Hideo Onizawa, Takaichi Okano, Keisuke Nishimura, Ayaka Yoshikawa, Hideyuki Shiba, Hideki Amuro, Yonsu Son, Motomu Hashimoto, Tadashi Okano, Ryota Hara, Wataru Yamamoto, Shotaro Tachibana, Shinya Hayashi, Takaaki Noguchi, Atsushi Kumanogoh, Seiji Okada, Ken Nakata, Kosuke Ebina","doi":"10.1093/mr/roaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to identify the impact of rheumatoid factor (RF) or anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) titres on the retention of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 5312 courses of bDMARDs or JAKis from the ANSWER cohort. To calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment discontinuation, we used multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling, adjusted for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HRs for discontinuation due to ineffectiveness were calculated based on RF classification, revealing that anti-interleukin-6 receptor (aIL-6R) antibodies exhibited the highest retention rates regardless of RF titre. In the RF-positive group, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) showed lower retention rates, whereas cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-Ig (CTLA4-Ig) and JAKis followed aIL-6R in the retention rates. When classified based on ACPA, aIL-6R also exhibited the highest retention rates across all ACPA groups. TNFis showed lower retention rates compared with other agents in the ACPA-positive group, whereas CTLA4-Ig showed lower retention rates in the ACPA-negative group compared with other agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering effectiveness, aIL-6R showed the highest retention rates regardless of seropositivity. Although CTLA4-Ig and JAKis followed aIL-6R in RF or ACPA-positive cases, CTLA4-Ig showed the lowest retention rates in ACPA-negative cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"820-829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roaf029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to identify the impact of rheumatoid factor (RF) or anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) titres on the retention of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 5312 courses of bDMARDs or JAKis from the ANSWER cohort. To calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment discontinuation, we used multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling, adjusted for potential confounders.

Results: HRs for discontinuation due to ineffectiveness were calculated based on RF classification, revealing that anti-interleukin-6 receptor (aIL-6R) antibodies exhibited the highest retention rates regardless of RF titre. In the RF-positive group, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) showed lower retention rates, whereas cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-Ig (CTLA4-Ig) and JAKis followed aIL-6R in the retention rates. When classified based on ACPA, aIL-6R also exhibited the highest retention rates across all ACPA groups. TNFis showed lower retention rates compared with other agents in the ACPA-positive group, whereas CTLA4-Ig showed lower retention rates in the ACPA-negative group compared with other agents.

Conclusions: Considering effectiveness, aIL-6R showed the highest retention rates regardless of seropositivity. Although CTLA4-Ig and JAKis followed aIL-6R in RF or ACPA-positive cases, CTLA4-Ig showed the lowest retention rates in ACPA-negative cases.

RF和ACPA滴度对生物制剂和JAK抑制剂的有效性和持久性的显著影响:ANSWER队列研究。
目的:我们旨在确定类风湿因子(RF)或抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体(ACPA)滴度对类风湿关节炎患者生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)和Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)保留的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了来自ANSWER队列的5312个bDMARDs或JAKi病程。为了计算治疗中断的风险比(hr),我们使用了多变量Cox比例风险模型,并对潜在混杂因素进行了调整。结果:根据RF分类计算因无效而停药的hr,显示无论RF滴度如何,抗白细胞介素-6受体抗体(il - 6r)的保留率最高。在rf阳性组中,肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)的保留率较低,而细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原-4- ig (CTLA4-Ig)和JAKi的保留率紧随il - 6r。当根据ACPA进行分类时,il - 6r在所有ACPA组中也表现出最高的保留率。与acpa阳性组相比,TNFi的保留率较低,而CTLA4-Ig在acpa阴性组的保留率较低。结论:考虑疗效,无论血清是否呈阳性,il - 6r保留率最高。尽管CTLA4-Ig和JAKi在RF或acpa阳性病例中紧随aIL-6R,但CTLA4-Ig在acpa阴性病例中保留率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Rheumatology
Modern Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery. Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered. Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信