The short-term efficacy of modified plate reconstruction and tubularization urethroplasty for posterior hypospadias.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Yonglong Wu, Wenni Li, Shoufu Wang, Yang Hu, Ying Zhang, Bo Xu, Haichen Chen
{"title":"The short-term efficacy of modified plate reconstruction and tubularization urethroplasty for posterior hypospadias.","authors":"Yonglong Wu, Wenni Li, Shoufu Wang, Yang Hu, Ying Zhang, Bo Xu, Haichen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.02.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the short-term efficacy of modified plate reconstruction and tubularization urethroplasty for posterior hypospadias.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>We retrospectively collected the clinical data of posterior hypospadias patients who were newly diagnosed and underwent plate reconstruction and tubularization urethroplasty (PRTU) or modified PRTU. Surgical modifications were to reconstruct the glans segment of the urethra with a free flap, thus presenting an orthotopic urethral opening, and to preserve the Buck's fascia at the coronal sulcus for approximately 1 cm to enhance coverage of the shaped urethra. Regular follow-up was taken in clinic or online. We compared complication rate, HOSE score and uroflowmetry testing results between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 children underwent either PRTU or modified PRTU, and 102 of them were fully followed-up (55 cases of PRTU and 47 cases of modified PRTU). All of the patients were diagnosed with posterior hypospadias. The age at operation ranged from 1 year to 1 month to 14 years old (mean age 3 years and 2 months). The postoperative follow-up period ranged from six to 63 months, with an average follow-up period of 23.2 months, and 102 patients provided comprehensive post-operative data, exhibiting a comprehensive follow-up rate of 95.3 %. There's a statistically significant difference in the incidence of dehiscence of urethra between PRTU group (10 cases) and modified PRTU group (2 cases).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified PRTU is a safe, practical, and effective method for hypospadias. This procedure is appropriate for repairing posterior-type hypospadias combined with penoscrotal transposition, while reducing the risk of postoperative urethral dehiscence and achieve good appearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.02.039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the short-term efficacy of modified plate reconstruction and tubularization urethroplasty for posterior hypospadias.

Material and method: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of posterior hypospadias patients who were newly diagnosed and underwent plate reconstruction and tubularization urethroplasty (PRTU) or modified PRTU. Surgical modifications were to reconstruct the glans segment of the urethra with a free flap, thus presenting an orthotopic urethral opening, and to preserve the Buck's fascia at the coronal sulcus for approximately 1 cm to enhance coverage of the shaped urethra. Regular follow-up was taken in clinic or online. We compared complication rate, HOSE score and uroflowmetry testing results between these two groups.

Results: A total of 107 children underwent either PRTU or modified PRTU, and 102 of them were fully followed-up (55 cases of PRTU and 47 cases of modified PRTU). All of the patients were diagnosed with posterior hypospadias. The age at operation ranged from 1 year to 1 month to 14 years old (mean age 3 years and 2 months). The postoperative follow-up period ranged from six to 63 months, with an average follow-up period of 23.2 months, and 102 patients provided comprehensive post-operative data, exhibiting a comprehensive follow-up rate of 95.3 %. There's a statistically significant difference in the incidence of dehiscence of urethra between PRTU group (10 cases) and modified PRTU group (2 cases).

Conclusion: Modified PRTU is a safe, practical, and effective method for hypospadias. This procedure is appropriate for repairing posterior-type hypospadias combined with penoscrotal transposition, while reducing the risk of postoperative urethral dehiscence and achieve good appearance.

改良尿道板重建术和管状尿道成形术治疗后尿道下裂的短期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信