Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of orbital cavernous hemangiomas: a retrospective multicentric case series.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cesare Zoia, Vittorio Ricciuti, Paolo Battaglia, Daniele Bongetta, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Carlo G Giussani, Giannantonio Spena, Diego Mazzatenta, Matteo Zoli
{"title":"Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of orbital cavernous hemangiomas: a retrospective multicentric case series.","authors":"Cesare Zoia, Vittorio Ricciuti, Paolo Battaglia, Daniele Bongetta, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Carlo G Giussani, Giannantonio Spena, Diego Mazzatenta, Matteo Zoli","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06438-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of choice for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs) is surgical resection, and multiple approaches have been proposed for these challenging deep-seated lesions of the orbit. In the latest years, endoscopic approaches, as the endonasal (EEA) or the transorbital (ETA), have been suggested as minimally invasive alternatives for these tumors, but few large works in literature are reported. In this article, the experience of three Italian referral centers with the endoscopic treatment of OCHs is described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with OCHs operated with an endoscopic approach since January 2015 to January 2024 in 3 Italian referral centers were retrospectively collected. Patients' characteristics and symptoms, OCHs localization and type of endoscopic approach were reported. Postoperative complications, clinical outcome and cosmetic results (evaluated with Clavien-Dindo Classification and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale) at follow-up were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients were included, 16 were females. ETA was preferred in 19 patients and EEA in 15. All OCHs of the lateral quadrants were treated with ETA. 14/18 cases located in the medial quadrants were treated with EEA, since in 4 of the supero-medial quadrants lesions, an ETA was preferred. Finally, the orbital apex lesion was treated with EEA. Complete resection was achieved in 31 (91.2%) cases. Complications were transient and consisted in 3 cases of diplopia, 1 of medial rectus palsy and 1 of supraorbital neuralgia, all spontaneously regressed at follow-up. An optimal cosmetic outcome was achieved in all patients both after an EEA and an ETA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of OCHs are a safe and valid surgical option, allowing a complete resection avoiding any brain manipulation. Thanks to their less invasiveness, endoscopic approaches guarantee limited neurological and functional sequalae. Moreover, they resulted well tolerated and ensured good cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06438-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment of choice for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs) is surgical resection, and multiple approaches have been proposed for these challenging deep-seated lesions of the orbit. In the latest years, endoscopic approaches, as the endonasal (EEA) or the transorbital (ETA), have been suggested as minimally invasive alternatives for these tumors, but few large works in literature are reported. In this article, the experience of three Italian referral centers with the endoscopic treatment of OCHs is described.

Methods: All patients with OCHs operated with an endoscopic approach since January 2015 to January 2024 in 3 Italian referral centers were retrospectively collected. Patients' characteristics and symptoms, OCHs localization and type of endoscopic approach were reported. Postoperative complications, clinical outcome and cosmetic results (evaluated with Clavien-Dindo Classification and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale) at follow-up were assessed.

Results: Thirty-four patients were included, 16 were females. ETA was preferred in 19 patients and EEA in 15. All OCHs of the lateral quadrants were treated with ETA. 14/18 cases located in the medial quadrants were treated with EEA, since in 4 of the supero-medial quadrants lesions, an ETA was preferred. Finally, the orbital apex lesion was treated with EEA. Complete resection was achieved in 31 (91.2%) cases. Complications were transient and consisted in 3 cases of diplopia, 1 of medial rectus palsy and 1 of supraorbital neuralgia, all spontaneously regressed at follow-up. An optimal cosmetic outcome was achieved in all patients both after an EEA and an ETA.

Conclusions: Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of OCHs are a safe and valid surgical option, allowing a complete resection avoiding any brain manipulation. Thanks to their less invasiveness, endoscopic approaches guarantee limited neurological and functional sequalae. Moreover, they resulted well tolerated and ensured good cosmetic outcomes.

内镜入路治疗眼眶海绵状血管瘤:回顾性多中心病例系列。
背景:眼眶海绵状血管瘤(OCHs)的治疗选择是手术切除,对于这些具有挑战性的眼眶深部病变,已有多种方法被提出。近年来,内镜入路,如经鼻内镜(EEA)或经眶内镜(ETA),已被建议作为这些肿瘤的微创治疗方法,但很少有大型文献报道。在这篇文章中,三个意大利转诊中心与内窥镜治疗OCHs的经验被描述。方法:回顾性收集意大利3家转诊中心2015年1月至2024年1月所有经内窥镜手术的OCHs患者。报告患者的特征和症状,OCHs定位和内镜入路类型。随访时观察术后并发症、临床结局及美容效果(采用Clavien-Dindo分级及疤痕美容评定评定量表)。结果:共纳入34例患者,其中女性16例。19例患者选择ETA, 15例患者选择EEA。所有侧象限的OCHs均采用ETA治疗。14/18位于内侧象限的病例接受了EEA治疗,因为在4个上内侧象限病变中,ETA是首选。最后用EEA治疗眶尖病变。31例(91.2%)完全切除。并发症为一过性,复视3例,内直肌麻痹1例,眶上神经痛1例,随访时均自行消退。所有患者在EEA和ETA后均获得了最佳的美容结果。结论:内镜入路治疗OCHs是一种安全有效的手术选择,可以完全切除,避免任何脑部操作。由于其侵入性较小,内镜入路保证了有限的神经和功能后遗症。此外,它们产生了良好的耐受性,并确保了良好的美容效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信