Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of orbital cavernous hemangiomas: a retrospective multicentric case series.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cesare Zoia, Vittorio Ricciuti, Paolo Battaglia, Daniele Bongetta, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Carlo G Giussani, Giannantonio Spena, Diego Mazzatenta, Matteo Zoli
{"title":"Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of orbital cavernous hemangiomas: a retrospective multicentric case series.","authors":"Cesare Zoia, Vittorio Ricciuti, Paolo Battaglia, Daniele Bongetta, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Carlo G Giussani, Giannantonio Spena, Diego Mazzatenta, Matteo Zoli","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06438-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of choice for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs) is surgical resection, and multiple approaches have been proposed for these challenging deep-seated lesions of the orbit. In the latest years, endoscopic approaches, as the endonasal (EEA) or the transorbital (ETA), have been suggested as minimally invasive alternatives for these tumors, but few large works in literature are reported. In this article, the experience of three Italian referral centers with the endoscopic treatment of OCHs is described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with OCHs operated with an endoscopic approach since January 2015 to January 2024 in 3 Italian referral centers were retrospectively collected. Patients' characteristics and symptoms, OCHs localization and type of endoscopic approach were reported. Postoperative complications, clinical outcome and cosmetic results (evaluated with Clavien-Dindo Classification and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale) at follow-up were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients were included, 16 were females. ETA was preferred in 19 patients and EEA in 15. All OCHs of the lateral quadrants were treated with ETA. 14/18 cases located in the medial quadrants were treated with EEA, since in 4 of the supero-medial quadrants lesions, an ETA was preferred. Finally, the orbital apex lesion was treated with EEA. Complete resection was achieved in 31 (91.2%) cases. Complications were transient and consisted in 3 cases of diplopia, 1 of medial rectus palsy and 1 of supraorbital neuralgia, all spontaneously regressed at follow-up. An optimal cosmetic outcome was achieved in all patients both after an EEA and an ETA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of OCHs are a safe and valid surgical option, allowing a complete resection avoiding any brain manipulation. Thanks to their less invasiveness, endoscopic approaches guarantee limited neurological and functional sequalae. Moreover, they resulted well tolerated and ensured good cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06438-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment of choice for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs) is surgical resection, and multiple approaches have been proposed for these challenging deep-seated lesions of the orbit. In the latest years, endoscopic approaches, as the endonasal (EEA) or the transorbital (ETA), have been suggested as minimally invasive alternatives for these tumors, but few large works in literature are reported. In this article, the experience of three Italian referral centers with the endoscopic treatment of OCHs is described.

Methods: All patients with OCHs operated with an endoscopic approach since January 2015 to January 2024 in 3 Italian referral centers were retrospectively collected. Patients' characteristics and symptoms, OCHs localization and type of endoscopic approach were reported. Postoperative complications, clinical outcome and cosmetic results (evaluated with Clavien-Dindo Classification and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale) at follow-up were assessed.

Results: Thirty-four patients were included, 16 were females. ETA was preferred in 19 patients and EEA in 15. All OCHs of the lateral quadrants were treated with ETA. 14/18 cases located in the medial quadrants were treated with EEA, since in 4 of the supero-medial quadrants lesions, an ETA was preferred. Finally, the orbital apex lesion was treated with EEA. Complete resection was achieved in 31 (91.2%) cases. Complications were transient and consisted in 3 cases of diplopia, 1 of medial rectus palsy and 1 of supraorbital neuralgia, all spontaneously regressed at follow-up. An optimal cosmetic outcome was achieved in all patients both after an EEA and an ETA.

Conclusions: Endoscopic approaches for the treatment of OCHs are a safe and valid surgical option, allowing a complete resection avoiding any brain manipulation. Thanks to their less invasiveness, endoscopic approaches guarantee limited neurological and functional sequalae. Moreover, they resulted well tolerated and ensured good cosmetic outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信