High-frequency vessel noise can mask porpoise echolocation.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1242/jeb.249963
Line Hermannsen, Michael Ladegaard, Pernille Tønnesen, Chloe Malinka, Kristian Beedholm, Jakob Tougaard, Laia Rojano-Doñate, Peter L Tyack, Peter T Madsen
{"title":"High-frequency vessel noise can mask porpoise echolocation.","authors":"Line Hermannsen, Michael Ladegaard, Pernille Tønnesen, Chloe Malinka, Kristian Beedholm, Jakob Tougaard, Laia Rojano-Doñate, Peter L Tyack, Peter T Madsen","doi":"10.1242/jeb.249963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasonic cavitation noise from fast vessels overlaps spectrally with echolocation clicks of toothed whales and therefore has the potential to degrade echolocation performance through auditory masking of returning echoes. Here, we tested that hypothesis by exposing two trained echolocating porpoises carrying DTAGs to two different levels of decidecade noise centered on 2 kHz (non-masking) and 125 kHz (masking) during an active target discrimination task. We found no click level adjustments or effects on discrimination performance in trials with non-masking noise or low-level masking noise. However, when exposed to high-level masking noise of 113±3 dB re. 1 µPa root mean square (RMS), the porpoises increased their mean click source levels by 7-17 dB. Despite this Lombard response of 0.2-0.5 dBsignal/dBnoise, and longer time and more clicks used by the porpoises to perform the task in noise, both animals were still significantly poorer at discriminating the targets (64-85% success rate) than in the other treatments (94-100%), thus demonstrating adverse masking effects. When the porpoises were offered spatial release from masking by relocating the noise source off-axis relative to the animal-to-target axis, echolocation performance was regained. We conclude that moderate levels of high-frequency noise, such as from cavitating vessel propellers several hundred meters from a vessel, can mask porpoise echolocation in a way that cannot be fully compensated for. As biosonar is vital for foraging and navigation around hazards such as gillnets for porpoises and other toothed whales, this study highlights that masking effects should be considered in impact assessments of cavitating vessels around echolocating toothed whales.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":"228 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultrasonic cavitation noise from fast vessels overlaps spectrally with echolocation clicks of toothed whales and therefore has the potential to degrade echolocation performance through auditory masking of returning echoes. Here, we tested that hypothesis by exposing two trained echolocating porpoises carrying DTAGs to two different levels of decidecade noise centered on 2 kHz (non-masking) and 125 kHz (masking) during an active target discrimination task. We found no click level adjustments or effects on discrimination performance in trials with non-masking noise or low-level masking noise. However, when exposed to high-level masking noise of 113±3 dB re. 1 µPa root mean square (RMS), the porpoises increased their mean click source levels by 7-17 dB. Despite this Lombard response of 0.2-0.5 dBsignal/dBnoise, and longer time and more clicks used by the porpoises to perform the task in noise, both animals were still significantly poorer at discriminating the targets (64-85% success rate) than in the other treatments (94-100%), thus demonstrating adverse masking effects. When the porpoises were offered spatial release from masking by relocating the noise source off-axis relative to the animal-to-target axis, echolocation performance was regained. We conclude that moderate levels of high-frequency noise, such as from cavitating vessel propellers several hundred meters from a vessel, can mask porpoise echolocation in a way that cannot be fully compensated for. As biosonar is vital for foraging and navigation around hazards such as gillnets for porpoises and other toothed whales, this study highlights that masking effects should be considered in impact assessments of cavitating vessels around echolocating toothed whales.

高频船只噪音可以掩盖海豚的回声定位。
来自快速船只的超声空化噪声与齿鲸的回声定位声在频谱上重叠,因此有可能通过对返回回声的听觉掩盖来降低回声定位性能。在这里,我们通过在主动目标识别任务中,将两只携带DTAGs的训练有素的回声定位鼠海豚暴露在以2 kHz(非掩蔽)和125 kHz(掩蔽)为中心的两种不同水平的十年噪声中来验证这一假设。在无掩蔽噪声或低掩蔽噪声的试验中,我们没有发现点击水平的调整或对辨别性能的影响。然而,当暴露于113±3 dB / 1 μ Pa均方根(RMS)的高水平掩蔽噪声时,鼠海豚的平均点击源水平增加了7-17 dB。尽管有0.2-0.5 dBsignal/dBnoise的伦巴第反应,并且鼠海豚在噪声环境下执行任务的时间更长,点击次数更多,但两种动物在识别目标方面(64-85%的成功率)仍然明显低于其他处理(94-100%),从而显示出不利的掩膜效应。通过将噪声源相对于动物到目标的轴线移开,使鼠海豚从掩蔽中得到空间释放,回声定位性能得以恢复。我们的结论是,中等水平的高频噪音,比如几百米外的空化船只螺旋桨发出的噪音,可以在某种程度上掩盖海豚的回声定位,这是无法完全补偿的。由于生物声纳对于鼠海豚和其他齿鲸在刺网等危险环境中觅食和导航至关重要,因此本研究强调,在回声定位齿鲸周围空化血管的影响评估中应考虑掩蔽效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信