Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Chih Peng Chin, Micah Levy, Modassar Awan, Michael Palese
{"title":"Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy.","authors":"Chih Peng Chin, Micah Levy, Modassar Awan, Michael Palese","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) has been shown to be a safe and effective method for living donor nephrectomy. RDN can utilize both a multi-port (MP) and a single-port (SP) approach, which share many similarities but differ in certain aspects of the preoperative and intraoperative approach. These differences and the findings of studies reporting clinical outcomes of both the MP and SP approaches are discussed in the following video and written article. In this article, we describe the indications, preoperative preparations, and postoperative care plans for RDN at our institution as well as some of the major differences in the equipment, patient positioning, and port placements for the MP <i>vs</i> SP approaches. We then detail the 12-step surgical technique for both the MP and SP, indicating major differences in how the surgical approach can impact intraoperative measures. Finally, we summarize our recent findings on the clinical success of the MP and SP approaches as compared with laparoscopic approaches and between the MP and SP techniques. Together, our clinical and research experiences have shown that both the MP and SP are safe, feasible, and effective options for living donor nephrectomy. When compared with the laparoscopic technique and when comparing the MP with the SP approaches, they both offer comparable graft outcomes. From our clinical experience, certain aspects of the SP approach may offer advantages during specific steps of the procedure. Future randomized prospective clinical trials are necessary to confirm the findings of our clinical and research experiences and to continue to identify possible benefits or drawbacks of the SP and MP RDN.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":"39 S1","pages":"S66-S71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) has been shown to be a safe and effective method for living donor nephrectomy. RDN can utilize both a multi-port (MP) and a single-port (SP) approach, which share many similarities but differ in certain aspects of the preoperative and intraoperative approach. These differences and the findings of studies reporting clinical outcomes of both the MP and SP approaches are discussed in the following video and written article. In this article, we describe the indications, preoperative preparations, and postoperative care plans for RDN at our institution as well as some of the major differences in the equipment, patient positioning, and port placements for the MP vs SP approaches. We then detail the 12-step surgical technique for both the MP and SP, indicating major differences in how the surgical approach can impact intraoperative measures. Finally, we summarize our recent findings on the clinical success of the MP and SP approaches as compared with laparoscopic approaches and between the MP and SP techniques. Together, our clinical and research experiences have shown that both the MP and SP are safe, feasible, and effective options for living donor nephrectomy. When compared with the laparoscopic technique and when comparing the MP with the SP approaches, they both offer comparable graft outcomes. From our clinical experience, certain aspects of the SP approach may offer advantages during specific steps of the procedure. Future randomized prospective clinical trials are necessary to confirm the findings of our clinical and research experiences and to continue to identify possible benefits or drawbacks of the SP and MP RDN.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信