PTSD screening using a ten-item checklist of psychological symptoms: a large-scale military veteran sample and a civilian comparison group.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Gerry Larsson, Sofia Nilsson, Alicia Ohlsson, Sofia Svensén, Marianne Stensvehagen
{"title":"PTSD screening using a ten-item checklist of psychological symptoms: a large-scale military veteran sample and a civilian comparison group.","authors":"Gerry Larsson, Sofia Nilsson, Alicia Ohlsson, Sofia Svensén, Marianne Stensvehagen","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2025.2479684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to explore if self-rated psychological symptoms in military veterans covary strong enough with established PTSD scales to make a symptom checklist a useful screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A Swedish sample of military veterans (<i>n</i> = 1,859) responded to a questionnaire which contained a checklist of ten psychological symptoms and a test of PTSD indication. The items measured the situation during the last month. All symptoms had the following response choices: 1 (<i>Never</i>), 2 (<i>Seldom</i>), 3 (<i>Sometimes</i>), 4 (<i>Often</i>) and 5 (<i>Very often</i>). The choices Often and Very often were combined and form the basis of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The majority of individuals in the military sample reported that they had not experienced any of the ten psychological symptoms often or very often during the last month. Approximately 5% of the men and 9% of the women scored five symptoms or more. Among the men who reported five symptoms or more, about one third scored above a higher established PTSD cut-off value (PCL-4 > 44).</p><p><strong>Originality: </strong>The psychological symptom checklist represents a new approach to PTSD indication screening and identification of individuals who may need further support.</p><p><strong>Research limitations and strengths: </strong>Clinical assessment of PTSD would be a necessary complement for those that indicate further need. Study strengths include a large sample, use of established scales and a straightforward and simple statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The checklist is easy to administer and score. After a brief introduction, it takes about two minutes to complete.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2025.2479684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to explore if self-rated psychological symptoms in military veterans covary strong enough with established PTSD scales to make a symptom checklist a useful screening tool.

Methodology: A Swedish sample of military veterans (n = 1,859) responded to a questionnaire which contained a checklist of ten psychological symptoms and a test of PTSD indication. The items measured the situation during the last month. All symptoms had the following response choices: 1 (Never), 2 (Seldom), 3 (Sometimes), 4 (Often) and 5 (Very often). The choices Often and Very often were combined and form the basis of the analysis.

Findings: The majority of individuals in the military sample reported that they had not experienced any of the ten psychological symptoms often or very often during the last month. Approximately 5% of the men and 9% of the women scored five symptoms or more. Among the men who reported five symptoms or more, about one third scored above a higher established PTSD cut-off value (PCL-4 > 44).

Originality: The psychological symptom checklist represents a new approach to PTSD indication screening and identification of individuals who may need further support.

Research limitations and strengths: Clinical assessment of PTSD would be a necessary complement for those that indicate further need. Study strengths include a large sample, use of established scales and a straightforward and simple statistical analysis.

Practical implications: The checklist is easy to administer and score. After a brief introduction, it takes about two minutes to complete.

使用心理症状十项检查表筛选PTSD:大规模退伍军人样本和平民对照组。
目的:探讨退伍军人自评心理症状是否与已建立的PTSD量表具有足够强的协同性,以使症状检查表成为一种有用的筛查工具。方法:瑞典退伍军人样本(n = 1859)回答了一份问卷,其中包含十种心理症状清单和创伤后应激障碍指征测试。这些项目衡量了上个月的情况。所有症状都有以下响应选项:1(从不),2(很少),3(有时),4(经常)和5(非常经常)。选择Often和Very Often结合在一起,形成分析的基础。调查结果:军事样本中的大多数人报告说,他们在过去一个月里没有经常或非常频繁地经历过这十种心理症状中的任何一种。大约5%的男性和9%的女性有五种或更多的症状。在报告有五种或五种以上症状的男性中,大约三分之一的得分高于较高的PTSD临界值(PCL-4 bbb44)。独创性:心理症状检查表代表了PTSD指征筛选和识别可能需要进一步支持的个体的新方法。研究的局限性和优势:PTSD的临床评估将是那些表明进一步需要的必要补充。研究的优势包括大样本,使用既定的量表和直接简单的统计分析。实际意义:该检查表易于管理和评分。经过简短的介绍后,大约需要两分钟才能完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信