Evaluation of LYR-220 Mometasone Sinonasal Implants in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Prior Ethmoid Surgery: Results From the Randomized, Blinded, Controlled BEACON Phase 2 Study.
Brent A Senior, Randall A Ow, M Scott Major, Stacey L Silvers, Jeffrey S Rosenbloom, Amber U Luong, Zachary M Soler, Robert Naclerio, Robert C Kern, Lindsay Brayton, Marina Mihova, Ela Sajjadi, Misun Lee, Vineeta Belanger, Richard Nieman
{"title":"Evaluation of LYR-220 Mometasone Sinonasal Implants in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Prior Ethmoid Surgery: Results From the Randomized, Blinded, Controlled BEACON Phase 2 Study.","authors":"Brent A Senior, Randall A Ow, M Scott Major, Stacey L Silvers, Jeffrey S Rosenbloom, Amber U Luong, Zachary M Soler, Robert Naclerio, Robert C Kern, Lindsay Brayton, Marina Mihova, Ela Sajjadi, Misun Lee, Vineeta Belanger, Richard Nieman","doi":"10.1002/alr.23567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) often fails to directly manage the underlying inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), resulting in symptom recurrence in a significant number of patients. LYR-220 is a long-acting (24-week) corticosteroid sinonasal implant being developed for treatment of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two adults with CRS and prior ESS were enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, controlled Phase 2 (BEACON) study. Patients received LYR-220 or a sham procedure bilaterally. The primary endpoint was occurrence of any treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline (CFBL) in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22); three cardinal symptoms (3CS) of CRS (nasal blockage, nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure); loss-of-smell; ethmoid percent opacification volume; and need for rescue treatment (systemic corticosteroids [SCS] or sinonasal surgery).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No SAEs were reported in the study. SNOT-22 scores significantly improved with LYR-220 versus sham from week 2 onwards, with a between group difference of -16.8 at Week 24 (p = 0.007). Between group difference at Week 24 for 3CS was -1.50 (p = 0.02) and for ethmoid percent opacification volume was -8.14 (p = 0.035). Five patients from LYR-220 group and seven from sham group used SCS. LYR-220 showed improvement versus sham in the loss-of-smell from Week 8 through the end of treatment at 24 weeks (-0.87, p = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BEACON study demonstrated safety, efficacy, feasibility, and tolerability of LYR-220 in patients with CRS who have had prior ESS. The primary endpoint was met, with no SAEs reported. LYR-220 demonstrated statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements in key symptomatic and objective efficacy endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"e23567"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) often fails to directly manage the underlying inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), resulting in symptom recurrence in a significant number of patients. LYR-220 is a long-acting (24-week) corticosteroid sinonasal implant being developed for treatment of these patients.
Methods: Forty-two adults with CRS and prior ESS were enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, controlled Phase 2 (BEACON) study. Patients received LYR-220 or a sham procedure bilaterally. The primary endpoint was occurrence of any treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline (CFBL) in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22); three cardinal symptoms (3CS) of CRS (nasal blockage, nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure); loss-of-smell; ethmoid percent opacification volume; and need for rescue treatment (systemic corticosteroids [SCS] or sinonasal surgery).
Results: No SAEs were reported in the study. SNOT-22 scores significantly improved with LYR-220 versus sham from week 2 onwards, with a between group difference of -16.8 at Week 24 (p = 0.007). Between group difference at Week 24 for 3CS was -1.50 (p = 0.02) and for ethmoid percent opacification volume was -8.14 (p = 0.035). Five patients from LYR-220 group and seven from sham group used SCS. LYR-220 showed improvement versus sham in the loss-of-smell from Week 8 through the end of treatment at 24 weeks (-0.87, p = 0.026).
Conclusions: The BEACON study demonstrated safety, efficacy, feasibility, and tolerability of LYR-220 in patients with CRS who have had prior ESS. The primary endpoint was met, with no SAEs reported. LYR-220 demonstrated statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements in key symptomatic and objective efficacy endpoints.
期刊介绍:
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy.
International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.